Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Generative Refinement Learning for Temporal Interpolation in Scientific Machine Learning

Abstract

Computationally expensive simulations and real-world observations often provide data at a lower temporal resolution than downstream tasks require. Averaging observations at fixed grid points can introduce errors, and motion estimates alone do not determine how the physical field values change. In this work, we study whether learning to correct a simple numerical interpolation improves the reconstruction of intermediate scientific fields. Our model, interpolative FLow EXpert (iFLEX), first estimates the missing field by taking a weighted average of the two observations at each grid point, giving more weight to the observation closer to the requested time. During training, subtracting this estimate from an observed intermediate field gives the residual that a conditional diffusion model learns to generate. Both observations condition the model, together with the target time, the interval between observations, and available physical parameters. To reconstruct an unobserved intermediate field, the generated residual is added to the weighted average. We evaluate iFLEX on Navier-Stokes Kraichnan turbulence, Shanghai radar precipitation, and sea surface temperature. Across these datasets, iFLEX achieves lower reconstruction error than the evaluated baselines, including optical-flow and diffusion models developed for video frame interpolation in computer vision. In a controlled turbulence comparison at a Reynolds number of 36,000, learning the residual reduces relative Frobenius norm error from about 13.7 for direct field generation to 10.5, with the diffusion backbone and training setup held fixed. Code is available at https://github.com/paulpuren/iflex.

Related

  1. PTED: A multi-dimensional two-sample test for scientific inference and generative machine learning
    Connor Stone
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsStatisticsarXiv
  2. Point interpolation and distributional universality in flow-based generative models
    Antonio Álvarez-López, Jingpu Cheng, Liyan Zhang +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  3. Cross-Modal Semantic Successive Refinement for Generative Image Communication over Underwater Acoustic Channels
    Xu Pei, Bin Wang, Guangxu Zhu +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts
    Mária Lakatos
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Scalable generative modeling of non-Gaussian spatio-temporal fields via autoregressive Gaussian processes
    Carrie J. Lei-Cramer, Jian Cao, Matthias Katzfuss
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ren2026generative,
  title = {{Generative Refinement Learning for Temporal Interpolation in Scientific Machine Learning}},
  author = {Pu Ren and Michael W. Mahoney and N. Benjamin Erichson},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.36751},
  eprint = {2610.36751},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36751},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Generative Refinement Learning for Temporal Interpolation in Scientific Machine Learning
AU  - Pu Ren
AU  - Michael W. Mahoney
AU  - N. Benjamin Erichson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.36751
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36751
AB  - Computationally expensive simulations and real-world observations often provide data at a lower temporal resolution than downstream tasks require. Averaging observations at fixed grid points can introduce errors, and motion estimates alone do not determine how the physical field values change. In this work, we study whether learning to correct a simple numerical interpolation improves the reconstruction of intermediate scientific fields. Our model, interpolative FLow EXpert (iFLEX), first estimates the missing field by taking a weighted average of the two observations at each grid point, giving more weight to the observation closer to the requested time. During training, subtracting this estimate from an observed intermediate field gives the residual that a conditional diffusion model learns to generate. Both observations condition the model, together with the target time, the interval between observations, and available physical parameters. To reconstruct an unobserved intermediate field, the generated residual is added to the weighted average. We evaluate iFLEX on Navier-Stokes Kraichnan turbulence, Shanghai radar precipitation, and sea surface temperature. Across these datasets, iFLEX achieves lower reconstruction error than the evaluated baselines, including optical-flow and diffusion models developed for video frame interpolation in computer vision. In a controlled turbulence comparison at a Reynolds number of 36,000, learning the residual reduces relative Frobenius norm error from about 13.7 for direct field generation to 10.5, with the diffusion backbone and training setup held fixed. Code is available at https://github.com/paulpuren/iflex.
ER  -