Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
188,932 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts

Abstract

Statistical post-processing improves ensemble weather forecasts, but generating calibrated predictions at locations without observations remains challenging. This study compares statistical and machine-learning-based methods for post-processing ECMWF 2-m temperature and 10-m wind speed forecasts at observed and unobserved stations in Germany. We consider EMOS-based approaches, distributional regression networks, Transformers, and graph neural networks under both limited and extended predictor settings. For temperature, we also investigate linear forecast combinations and propose an altitude-aware linear pool (ALP). The results show that post-processing improves upon the raw ensemble in most settings, but no single method performs best across all variables, station groups, and evaluation metrics. The proposed ALP provides a small but significant improvement over the standard linear pool at unobserved locations.

Related

  1. The influence of ensemble size and composition on the performance of combined real-time COVID-19 forecasts
    Friederike Becker, Katharine Sherratt, Nikos I. Bosse +1
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  2. Learning joint probabilistic weather forecasts from station observations alone
    Chaeyeon Yi, Yun Am Seo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsarXiv
  3. Flowz: When Does Learning Forecast Errors Add Value? Conditional Flow Matching for Financial Price Forecasts
    Giancarlo Vercellino
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Generative Refinement Learning for Temporal Interpolation in Scientific Machine Learning
    Pu Ren, Michael W. Mahoney, N. Benjamin Erichson
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsStatisticsarXiv
  5. Strictly Replicable Realizable Learning: Unknown Marginals, Finite-Class Interpolation, and the Cost of Shared Randomness
    Guangjian Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lakatos2026statistical,
  title = {{Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts}},
  author = {Mária Lakatos},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.07512},
  eprint = {2609.07512},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07512},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts
AU  - Mária Lakatos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/07
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.07512
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07512
AB  - Statistical post-processing improves ensemble weather forecasts, but generating calibrated predictions at locations without observations remains challenging. This study compares statistical and machine-learning-based methods for post-processing ECMWF 2-m temperature and 10-m wind speed forecasts at observed and unobserved stations in Germany. We consider EMOS-based approaches, distributional regression networks, Transformers, and graph neural networks under both limited and extended predictor settings. For temperature, we also investigate linear forecast combinations and propose an altitude-aware linear pool (ALP). The results show that post-processing improves upon the raw ensemble in most settings, but no single method performs best across all variables, station groups, and evaluation metrics. The proposed ALP provides a small but significant improvement over the standard linear pool at unobserved locations.
ER  -