Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYApplied Sciences

Selection of Dental Implant Biomaterial by Using a Developed MCDM Solver

  1. 1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Niš, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia

Abstract

A proper selection of materials, especially biomaterials, ensures a reliable and long-lasting working life of the component, i.e., implant. The selection of materials for the manufacture of dental implants represents a significant challenge when it comes to the choice of biomaterials. The developed decision support system named MCDM Solver provides the possibility of evaluating and ranking biomaterials in relation to given criteria that can be grouped into mechanical, biological, chemical, aesthetic and technological–financial. In this study, based on 11 criteria, 17 biomaterials to produce dental implants were ranked. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the obtained rankings was performed by using a method of variation criteria weights and omitting the criterion C11 (machinability). In this study, within all limitations, it was shown that the best ranked materials to produce dental implants are β-type titanium alloys Ti-15Mo-5Zr and Ti-13Nb-13Zr, respectively, while CP Ti Grade 4 and Ti-15Zr are highly rated, right behind the best ranked β-type titanium alloys.

Related

  1. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotic prophylaxis for dental implant placement with bone augmentation procedures
    Riccardo Federico Visconti, Hassan Maghaireh, Caroline Bolle +1
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyHAL
  2. Role of MicroRNAs in regulating NF-kB Inflammatory pathways During Dental Implant Osseointegration
    Ghazal Soleimani, Pouria Farahani, Ailar Yousefbeigi +4
    International Journal of Molecular and Cellular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsGeneral chemistryDOAJPMC
  3. Factors Associated With Patient‐Reported Outcomes More Than 5 Years After Dental Implant Therapy: A Cross‐Sectional Study
    Simone Sbalchiero, Grégoire Habay, Pierre‐yves Gegout +1
    Clinical Oral Implants ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyGeneral medicineHAL
  4. Implant selection at elective aseptic revision of a primary total knee replacement: A scoping review and map of the evidence
    Ben Tyas, John Norman, Shivam Nitin Kolhe +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologyPhysiologyPLOSEurope PMC
  5. Recent Advances in Immunomodulatory Biomaterial Strategies for Neural Tissue Healing
    Luke Childress, Lin Li, Patrick Wallace Harmon +1
    Acta biomaterialiaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurosciencePMC
BibTeX
@article{petkovic2026selection,
  title = {{Selection of Dental Implant Biomaterial by Using a Developed MCDM Solver}},
  author = {Dušan Lj. Petković and Miloš J. Madić and Kosta M. Todorović},
  journal = {Applied Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/app16209987},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/app16209987},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Selection of Dental Implant Biomaterial by Using a Developed MCDM Solver
AU  - Dušan Lj. Petković
AU  - Miloš J. Madić
AU  - Kosta M. Todorović
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Applied Sciences
DO  - 10.3390/app16209987
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/app16209987
AB  - A proper selection of materials, especially biomaterials, ensures a reliable and long-lasting working life of the component, i.e., implant. The selection of materials for the manufacture of dental implants represents a significant challenge when it comes to the choice of biomaterials. The developed decision support system named MCDM Solver provides the possibility of evaluating and ranking biomaterials in relation to given criteria that can be grouped into mechanical, biological, chemical, aesthetic and technological–financial. In this study, based on 11 criteria, 17 biomaterials to produce dental implants were ranked. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the obtained rankings was performed by using a method of variation criteria weights and omitting the criterion C11 (machinability). In this study, within all limitations, it was shown that the best ranked materials to produce dental implants are β-type titanium alloys Ti-15Mo-5Zr and Ti-13Nb-13Zr, respectively, while CP Ti Grade 4 and Ti-15Zr are highly rated, right behind the best ranked β-type titanium alloys.
SN  - 2076-3417
ER  -