PreprintarXiv licencearXiv
A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs P(n,3)
Abstract
Rashidi, Shajareh Poursalavati, and Tavakkoli [J. Algebra Comb. Discrete Struct. Appl. 7 (2020), no.2, 183-193, Theorem 3.6] claim Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for all n ≥ 12, but this fails at n = 12, where Z(P(12,3)) = 7. We give an explicit $7$-vertex zero forcing set for P(12,3) and its forcing sequence, and verify by exhaustive search that no $6$-vertex set forces P(12,3). We prove Z(P(n,3)) ≤ 8 for n ≥ 9 using an explicit forcing set and rotational symmetry. Exhaustive search yields $Z(P(n,3))$ for 7 ≤ n ≤ 20 and identifies the gap in the published proof: its case analysis fails to exclude $7$-vertex sets. We conjecture Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for n ≥ 13, requiring a matching lower bound for all large n.
Related
- Sharp zero forcing numbers for the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,3) and P(n,4)
- On the exact quantum chromatic number of generalized Johnson graphs
- The game chromatic number of generalized Mycielski graphs of paths and cycles
- The forbidden structure for zero forcing number
- History-Conditioned Inference of Memory and Stochastic Forcing in Generalized Langevin Equations under Lévy Noise
BibTeX
@misc{krishnan2026correction,
title = {{A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs $P(n,3)$}},
author = {Arnav Krishnan},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.19412},
eprint = {2607.19412},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19412},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs P(n,3)
AU - Arnav Krishnan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.19412
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19412
AB - Rashidi, Shajareh Poursalavati, and Tavakkoli [J. Algebra Comb. Discrete Struct. Appl. 7 (2020), no.2, 183-193, Theorem 3.6] claim Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for all n ≥ 12, but this fails at n = 12, where Z(P(12,3)) = 7. We give an explicit $7$-vertex zero forcing set for P(12,3) and its forcing sequence, and verify by exhaustive search that no $6$-vertex set forces P(12,3). We prove Z(P(n,3)) ≤ 8 for n ≥ 9 using an explicit forcing set and rotational symmetry. Exhaustive search yields $Z(P(n,3))$ for 7 ≤ n ≤ 20 and identifies the gap in the published proof: its case analysis fails to exclude $7$-vertex sets. We conjecture Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for n ≥ 13, requiring a matching lower bound for all large n.
ER -