Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs P(n,3)

Abstract

Rashidi, Shajareh Poursalavati, and Tavakkoli [J. Algebra Comb. Discrete Struct. Appl. 7 (2020), no.2, 183-193, Theorem 3.6] claim Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for all n ≥ 12, but this fails at n = 12, where Z(P(12,3)) = 7. We give an explicit $7$-vertex zero forcing set for P(12,3) and its forcing sequence, and verify by exhaustive search that no $6$-vertex set forces P(12,3). We prove Z(P(n,3)) ≤ 8 for n ≥ 9 using an explicit forcing set and rotational symmetry. Exhaustive search yields $Z(P(n,3))$ for 7 ≤ n ≤ 20 and identifies the gap in the published proof: its case analysis fails to exclude $7$-vertex sets. We conjecture Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for n ≥ 13, requiring a matching lower bound for all large n.

Related

  1. Sharp zero forcing numbers for the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,3) and P(n,4)
    Arnav Krishnan, Haobo Ma, Wenlin Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. On the exact quantum chromatic number of generalized Johnson graphs
    Gaojun Luo, Xiwang Cao, Shitao Li +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. The game chromatic number of generalized Mycielski graphs of paths and cycles
    Yushuang Mou, Qiang Sun, Chao Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. The forbidden structure for zero forcing number
    Carlos A. Alfaro, Michael D. Barrus, Sergio Gerardo Gómez-Galicia +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. History-Conditioned Inference of Memory and Stochastic Forcing in Generalized Langevin Equations under Lévy Noise
    Yang Yang, Ting Gao, Xiaoli Chen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{krishnan2026correction,
  title = {{A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs $P(n,3)$}},
  author = {Arnav Krishnan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.19412},
  eprint = {2607.19412},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19412},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs P(n,3)
AU  - Arnav Krishnan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.19412
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19412
AB  - Rashidi, Shajareh Poursalavati, and Tavakkoli [J. Algebra Comb. Discrete Struct. Appl. 7 (2020), no.2, 183-193, Theorem 3.6] claim Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for all n ≥ 12, but this fails at n = 12, where Z(P(12,3)) = 7. We give an explicit $7$-vertex zero forcing set for P(12,3) and its forcing sequence, and verify by exhaustive search that no $6$-vertex set forces P(12,3). We prove Z(P(n,3)) ≤ 8 for n ≥ 9 using an explicit forcing set and rotational symmetry. Exhaustive search yields $Z(P(n,3))$ for 7 ≤ n ≤ 20 and identifies the gap in the published proof: its case analysis fails to exclude $7$-vertex sets. We conjecture Z(P(n,3)) = 8 for n ≥ 13, requiring a matching lower bound for all large n.
ER  -