Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sharp zero forcing numbers for the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,3) and P(n,4)

Abstract

We prove that Z(P(n,3))=8 for every n≥13 and Z(P(n,4))=10 for every n≥18, with both stabilization thresholds sharp, and give the exact values for all smaller admissible n. The first equality proves Krishnan's Conjecture 5; his Proposition 4 supplies its upper bound. The lower bounds use the external boundary of the first forcing sources: ten vertices have boundary at least eight in P(n,3) for n≥14, and sixteen vertices have boundary at least ten in P(n,4) for n≥20. Deletion within an empty column interval reduces these assertions to finite checks, and forts settle the remaining cases. The k=3 stabilization theorem has a Lean 4 formalization; the k=4 proof uses 89 boundary formulas and 11 fort formulas with separately checked DRAT certificates, together with explicit forcing sequences.

Related

  1. A correction to the Zero Forcing Number of the Generalized Petersen Graphs P(n,3)
    Arnav Krishnan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Unstable Vortices, Sharp Non-Uniqueness with Forcing, and Global Smooth Solutions for the SQG Equation
    Ángel Castro, Daniel Faraco, Francisco Mengual +1
    Archive for Rational Mechanics and AnalysisPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text16 citedGeneral mathematicsOpenAlex
  3. Sharp Edge-Edit Bounds at Every Level for Leaky Positive Semidefinite Forcing
    Domenico Frijio
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. History-Conditioned Inference of Memory and Stochastic Forcing in Generalized Langevin Equations under Lévy Noise
    Yang Yang, Ting Gao, Xiaoli Chen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Zero Forcing on Maximal Outerplanar Graphs: Capacities and Phase Repair
    Zongjian Han, Yiran Liang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{krishnan2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp zero forcing numbers for the generalized Petersen graphs $P(n,3)$ and $P(n,4)$}},
  author = {Arnav Krishnan and Haobo Ma and Wenlin Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.24059},
  eprint = {2610.24059},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24059},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp zero forcing numbers for the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,3) and P(n,4)
AU  - Arnav Krishnan
AU  - Haobo Ma
AU  - Wenlin Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.24059
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24059
AB  - We prove that Z(P(n,3))=8 for every n≥13 and Z(P(n,4))=10 for every n≥18, with both stabilization thresholds sharp, and give the exact values for all smaller admissible n. The first equality proves Krishnan's Conjecture 5; his Proposition 4 supplies its upper bound. The lower bounds use the external boundary of the first forcing sources: ten vertices have boundary at least eight in P(n,3) for n≥14, and sixteen vertices have boundary at least ten in P(n,4) for n≥20. Deletion within an empty column interval reduces these assertions to finite checks, and forts settle the remaining cases. The k=3 stabilization theorem has a Lean 4 formalization; the k=4 proof uses 89 boundary formulas and 11 fort formulas with separately checked DRAT certificates, together with explicit forcing sequences.
ER  -