Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Cryosphere

A 2020 permafrost distribution map of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

  1. 1Shanghai Normal University (Shanghai, China)
  2. 2Nanjing Normal University (Nanjing, China)

Abstract

Permafrost on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) is undergoing rapid degradation, yet most existing distribution maps reflect long-term historical averages rather than the current thermal state of the ground. This temporal mismatch limits their usefulness for ecological, hydrological, and engineering applications. Here, we present a 1 km resolution permafrost distribution map for the 2020 period using an extended ground surface frost number model (FROSTNUM) driven by satellite-derived freezing/thawing indices. Because no concurrent field survey was available, we applied a space-for-time substitution strategy with Random Forest regression to estimate the empirical soil parameter ( E ) from environmental covariates. The resulting map shows that permafrost covered approximately 1.038 × 10 ⁶ km ² (39.35 % of the QTP), while seasonally frozen ground (SFG) covered 1.466 × 10 ⁶ km ² (55.57 %). Compared with the 2010 baseline, the permafrost area declined by 4.8 × 10 ⁴ km ² (a 1.82 % decrease). Degradation was spatially heterogeneous: the transition from permafrost to SFG was dominant in the central QTP, whereas the southern margin experienced substantial conversion of SFG to non-frozen ground. Validations against 109 independent borehole records yielded an overall accuracy of 0.84 and a Kappa of 0.58, outperforming existing 2020-period maps. This map provides a temporally specific reference for engineering risk assessment, ecological monitoring and the calibration of land surface models in this rapidly changing region.

Versions

Related

  1. Depth-resolved transcriptional activity of antibiotic resistance genes in deep permafrost of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
    Wasim Sajjad, Shichang Kang, Xiufeng Yin +4
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. Life Cycle of Retrogressive Thaw Slumps in a Warmer and Wetter Climate on the Central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
    Zhuoxuan Xia, Zhuoyi Zhao, Lin Liu +3
    npj Natural HazardsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionGeology & geochemistryHAL
  3. An integrated remote sensing framework reveals zone-specific ecological response trajectories to open-pit mining on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau
    Fangzhou Hong, Guojin He, Guizhou Wang +1
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  4. Typical thermokarst alters soil organic carbon fractions controlled by soil water content in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
    Ruizhe Wang, Xia Hu
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  5. Abrupt permafrost thaw overwhelms vegetation-driven erosion reduction in sediment export on the Tibetan Plateau
    Jiapei Ma, Genxu Wang, Chunlin Song +8
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
BibTeX
@article{chen20262020,
  title = {{A 2020 permafrost distribution map of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau}},
  author = {Yuhong Chen and Zhuotong Nan and Wenbiao Tian and Yi Zhao and Shuping Zhao and Dongkai Yang and Guifei Jing and Fujun Niu},
  journal = {The Cryosphere},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/tc-20-5697-2026},
  url = {https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/5697/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A 2020 permafrost distribution map of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
AU  - Yuhong Chen
AU  - Zhuotong Nan
AU  - Wenbiao Tian
AU  - Yi Zhao
AU  - Shuping Zhao
AU  - Dongkai Yang
AU  - Guifei Jing
AU  - Fujun Niu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - The Cryosphere
DO  - 10.5194/tc-20-5697-2026
UR  - https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/5697/2026/
AB  - Permafrost on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) is undergoing rapid degradation, yet most existing distribution maps reflect long-term historical averages rather than the current thermal state of the ground. This temporal mismatch limits their usefulness for ecological, hydrological, and engineering applications. Here, we present a 1 km resolution permafrost distribution map for the 2020 period using an extended ground surface frost number model (FROSTNUM) driven by satellite-derived freezing/thawing indices. Because no concurrent field survey was available, we applied a space-for-time substitution strategy with Random Forest regression to estimate the empirical soil parameter ( E ) from environmental covariates. The resulting map shows that permafrost covered approximately 1.038 × 10 ⁶ km ² (39.35 % of the QTP), while seasonally frozen ground (SFG) covered 1.466 × 10 ⁶ km ² (55.57 %). Compared with the 2010 baseline, the permafrost area declined by 4.8 × 10 ⁴ km ² (a 1.82 % decrease). Degradation was spatially heterogeneous: the transition from permafrost to SFG was dominant in the central QTP, whereas the southern margin experienced substantial conversion of SFG to non-frozen ground. Validations against 109 independent borehole records yielded an overall accuracy of 0.84 and a Kappa of 0.58, outperforming existing 2020-period maps. This map provides a temporally specific reference for engineering risk assessment, ecological monitoring and the calibration of land surface models in this rapidly changing region.
SN  - 1994-0424
ER  -