Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCInternational medical case reports journal

Unexpected Right-Sided Nerve Root Variant During L4-L5 Microdiscectomy and Decompression: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic and Intraoperative Challenges.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Al Hayat Medical University, Mogadishu, Somalia.
  2. 2Department of Inpatients, Horyaal Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.
  3. 3Department of Policy and Planning, Health Information Systems Section, Directorate of Health and Human Services, Mogadishu, Somalia.
  4. 4Department of Neurosurgery, Horyaal Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.
  5. 5Department of Emergency, Horyaal Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.
  6. 6Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Zamzam University of Science and Technology, Mogadishu, Somalia.

Abstract

Lumbosacral nerve root variants may complicate anatomical identification and decompression during lumbar spine surgery. We report a 45-year-old woman with progressive lower limb numbness and paresthesia predominantly affecting the right leg, intermittent low back pain, and right-sided radiating pain aggravated by standing and walking. Examination showed preserved motor strength and sensory impairment in a predominantly right L4 distribution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an L4-L5 disc bulge with thecal sac indentation, bilateral L5 nerve root abutment, and mild bilateral foraminal narrowing; no nerve root anomaly was reported. During L4-L5 microdiscectomy and decompression, two distinct right-sided neural structures were unexpectedly identified under microscopic visualization and interpreted as suspected duplication of the exiting L4 root. Both structures were preserved during decompression. Retrospective MRI review did not confirm the variant, and intraoperative electrophysiological identification was not feasible. During five months of monthly telephone follow-up, the patient reported improvement in radicular pain, walking tolerance, and sensory symptoms, without reported neurological deterioration. Follow-up neurological examinations and standardized outcome measures were unavailable. This case highlights the importance of recognizing and characterizing unexpected neural anatomy when clinical, imaging, and operative findings do not fully correlate. Definitive anatomical classification and objective postoperative recovery remain uncertain.

Related

  1. Unexpected positive intraoperative culture during supposed aseptic hip revision: Antibiotherapy is an effective and safe treatment. About 50 cases
    Guillaume Auberger, Pierre-Alban Bouché, Thomas Aubert +5
    SICOT-JPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Determinants of intraoperative radiation during single-level tubular lumbar decompression.
    Sahil Garg, Christopher Franquemont, Patrick Young +8
    North American Spine Society journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  3. Pulmonary Epithelioid Trophoblastic Tumor Without Demonstrable Uterine Involvement: A Case Report and Literature Review Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges and Multidisciplinary Management
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in a Patient With Alcohol‐Associated Liver Disease: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges
    Adalis Rivera, Hakan R. Toka, Yasser Samra +2
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  5. Emphysematous pyelonephritis in a diabetic patient: A case report highlighting diagnostic challenges and successful conservative management.
    Ya Gao, JianKai Gao
    Radiology case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{nor2026unexpected,
  title = {{Unexpected Right-Sided Nerve Root Variant During L4-L5 Microdiscectomy and Decompression: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic and Intraoperative Challenges.}},
  author = {Abukar Abdi Nor and Abdiweli Mohamed Abdi and Nur Abdullahi Karshe and Dayib Hussein Mohamed and Ayub Omar Adam and Mohamed Ismael Iman and Nor Haji Osman and Osman Mohamed Mohamud and Abdirahman Mohamed Jimale},
  journal = {International medical case reports journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/imcrj.s640726},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42936225},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Unexpected Right-Sided Nerve Root Variant During L4-L5 Microdiscectomy and Decompression: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic and Intraoperative Challenges.
AU  - Abukar Abdi Nor
AU  - Abdiweli Mohamed Abdi
AU  - Nur Abdullahi Karshe
AU  - Dayib Hussein Mohamed
AU  - Ayub Omar Adam
AU  - Mohamed Ismael Iman
AU  - Nor Haji Osman
AU  - Osman Mohamed Mohamud
AU  - Abdirahman Mohamed Jimale
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - International medical case reports journal
DO  - 10.2147/imcrj.s640726
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42936225
AB  - Lumbosacral nerve root variants may complicate anatomical identification and decompression during lumbar spine surgery. We report a 45-year-old woman with progressive lower limb numbness and paresthesia predominantly affecting the right leg, intermittent low back pain, and right-sided radiating pain aggravated by standing and walking. Examination showed preserved motor strength and sensory impairment in a predominantly right L4 distribution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an L4-L5 disc bulge with thecal sac indentation, bilateral L5 nerve root abutment, and mild bilateral foraminal narrowing; no nerve root anomaly was reported. During L4-L5 microdiscectomy and decompression, two distinct right-sided neural structures were unexpectedly identified under microscopic visualization and interpreted as suspected duplication of the exiting L4 root. Both structures were preserved during decompression. Retrospective MRI review did not confirm the variant, and intraoperative electrophysiological identification was not feasible. During five months of monthly telephone follow-up, the patient reported improvement in radicular pain, walking tolerance, and sensory symptoms, without reported neurological deterioration. Follow-up neurological examinations and standardized outcome measures were unavailable. This case highlights the importance of recognizing and characterizing unexpected neural anatomy when clinical, imaging, and operative findings do not fully correlate. Definitive anatomical classification and objective postoperative recovery remain uncertain.
SN  - 1179-142X
ER  -