Coronary stent fixation of left ventricular lead during CRT-D implantation: a case series of three patients
- 1Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital
Abstract
Objective: To investigate a salvage method using coronary stent fixation of the left ventricular (LV) lead to manage refractory LV lead dislodgement caused by unfavorable coronary venous anatomy during cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation, and to evaluate its technical feasibility and clinical value.
Methods: We retrospectively included three patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at our center who developed LV lead dislodgement during or early after CRT-D implantation. Conventional methods failed to maintain a stable lead position. A sirolimus-eluting coronary stent was deployed within the target coronary vein to achieve mechanical anchoring of the LV lead via gentle compression against the venous wall. Procedural details, perioperative complications, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.
Results: All three patients completed stent fixation of the LV lead. No acute severe complications, such as coronary venous rupture, pericardial tamponade, or lead conductor damage, occurred intraoperatively. No significant change in pacing threshold was observed before and after stent deployment. Cases 1 and 2 were followed for 30 and 26 months, respectively, and lead parameters remained stable. Case 3 was followed for only 2 months and then lost to follow-up; lead parameters were stable at that time point. No clinically meaningful improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was observed in Cases 1 and 2 during follow-up. Because Case 3 was followed for only 2 months, shorter than the usual 6–12-month window for assessing CRT reverse remodeling, functional response could not be evaluated. This procedure constitutes off-label device use; after full stent deployment, the lead position cannot be readjusted. If device-related infection occurs, transvenous lead extraction may be difficult and uncertain, and surgical removal may be required.
Conclusions: After all conventional methods have failed, stent fixation may serve as a salvage option for refractory LV lead dislodgement caused by unfavorable coronary venous anatomy. This report describes the clinical observations of sirolimus-eluting stent use in this off-label salvage procedure and details the relevant procedural parameters and techniques. However, the sample size is small, and potential long-term risks, including stent fracture, lead insulation damage, and stability of lead electrical parameters, require further evaluation in larger studies. This technique only addresses the mechanical fixation of the lead and does not guarantee functional benefit from CRT.
Related
- Coronary artery disease management in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Pacing during TAVR through a coronary wire in the coronary artery and left ventricular wire
- Perioperative temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device support in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
- Left ventricular function and volumes from cardiac magnetic resonance and gated [13N]-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries: a prospective head-to-head comparison using hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance
- Development and Population-Based Prognostic Utility Assessment of an ICD-10-CM-Based Prediction Model to Identify Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Discrimination Performance and Population-Based Evaluation in 83,357 Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
BibTeX
@article{yi2026coronary,
title = {{Coronary stent fixation of left ventricular lead during CRT-D implantation: a case series of three patients}},
author = {Hongwei Yi and Jia Li and Yue Bao and Hongwei Han},
journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984315},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984315/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Coronary stent fixation of left ventricular lead during CRT-D implantation: a case series of three patients
AU - Hongwei Yi
AU - Jia Li
AU - Yue Bao
AU - Hongwei Han
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984315
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984315/full
AB - Objective: To investigate a salvage method using coronary stent fixation of the left ventricular (LV) lead to manage refractory LV lead dislodgement caused by unfavorable coronary venous anatomy during cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation, and to evaluate its technical feasibility and clinical value. Methods: We retrospectively included three patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at our center who developed LV lead dislodgement during or early after CRT-D implantation. Conventional methods failed to maintain a stable lead position. A sirolimus-eluting coronary stent was deployed within the target coronary vein to achieve mechanical anchoring of the LV lead via gentle compression against the venous wall. Procedural details, perioperative complications, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results: All three patients completed stent fixation of the LV lead. No acute severe complications, such as coronary venous rupture, pericardial tamponade, or lead conductor damage, occurred intraoperatively. No significant change in pacing threshold was observed before and after stent deployment. Cases 1 and 2 were followed for 30 and 26 months, respectively, and lead parameters remained stable. Case 3 was followed for only 2 months and then lost to follow-up; lead parameters were stable at that time point. No clinically meaningful improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was observed in Cases 1 and 2 during follow-up. Because Case 3 was followed for only 2 months, shorter than the usual 6–12-month window for assessing CRT reverse remodeling, functional response could not be evaluated. This procedure constitutes off-label device use; after full stent deployment, the lead position cannot be readjusted. If device-related infection occurs, transvenous lead extraction may be difficult and uncertain, and surgical removal may be required. Conclusions: After all conventional methods have failed, stent fixation may serve as a salvage option for refractory LV lead dislodgement caused by unfavorable coronary venous anatomy. This report describes the clinical observations of sirolimus-eluting stent use in this off-label salvage procedure and details the relevant procedural parameters and techniques. However, the sample size is small, and potential long-term risks, including stent fracture, lead insulation damage, and stability of lead electrical parameters, require further evaluation in larger studies. This technique only addresses the mechanical fixation of the lead and does not guarantee functional benefit from CRT.
SN - 2297-055X
ER -