Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

Distributed risk-averse optimization via CVaR

Abstract

Distributed systems often operate under uncertainty, where minimizing expected loss may overlook rare but severe events. This paper studies a distributed risk-averse convex optimization problem in which agents cooperatively minimize the average of local conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) objectives over a time-varying network. Each agent has access only to noisy evaluations of its local loss function, rather than to its CVaR objective or gradient. We therefore develop a zeroth-order algorithm that uses sampled losses to construct empirical CVaR estimates and their gradient estimates. At each iteration, agents combine neighboring decisions and perform a local update. Under convexity and Lipschitz continuity assumptions, we prove that the agents reach exact asymptotic consensus. We also establish a finite-time expected suboptimality bound for the weighted ergodic iterate. With diminishing step sizes and fixed sample sizes, the local last iterates converge almost surely to a common optimum, and their limiting expected CVaR gap is bounded in terms of the smoothing and finite-sample errors. This distributed bound matches the parameter dependence of the centralized benchmark provided in this paper. Finally, simulations on a distributed sensor network estimation problem illustrate the efficacy of the method.

Related

  1. Risk-averse design optimization with CVaR constraints via multifidelity tail-region correction
    Gyeolhee Lee, Dongjin Lee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. A Unified Efficient Gradient-Based Heuristic For Box-Constrained Expectation-Related and Risk-Averse Stochastic Optimization Problems
    Mazen Alamir
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Risk-Aware Unit Commitment in District Heating Networks: Chance-Constrained and CVaR Optimization Under Demand Uncertainty
    Annika Buchholz, Janina Zittel, Thorsten Koch
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Conformal Risk-Averse Decision Making with Optimized Certainty Equivalent Risk Control
    Amirmohammad Farzaneh, Osvaldo Simeone
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Risk-Averse Decision Making with Multi-Level Reliability Guarantees
    Amirmohammad Farzaneh, Osvaldo Simeone
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026distributed,
  title = {{Distributed risk-averse optimization via CVaR}},
  author = {Siyi Wang and Kun Huang and Lei Xu and Karl H. Johansson},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.04460},
  eprint = {2609.04460},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04460},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Distributed risk-averse optimization via CVaR
AU  - Siyi Wang
AU  - Kun Huang
AU  - Lei Xu
AU  - Karl H. Johansson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.04460
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04460
AB  - Distributed systems often operate under uncertainty, where minimizing expected loss may overlook rare but severe events. This paper studies a distributed risk-averse convex optimization problem in which agents cooperatively minimize the average of local conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) objectives over a time-varying network. Each agent has access only to noisy evaluations of its local loss function, rather than to its CVaR objective or gradient. We therefore develop a zeroth-order algorithm that uses sampled losses to construct empirical CVaR estimates and their gradient estimates. At each iteration, agents combine neighboring decisions and perform a local update. Under convexity and Lipschitz continuity assumptions, we prove that the agents reach exact asymptotic consensus. We also establish a finite-time expected suboptimality bound for the weighted ergodic iterate. With diminishing step sizes and fixed sample sizes, the local last iterates converge almost surely to a common optimum, and their limiting expected CVaR gap is bounded in terms of the smoothing and finite-sample errors. This distributed bound matches the parameter dependence of the centralized benchmark provided in this paper. Finally, simulations on a distributed sensor network estimation problem illustrate the efficacy of the method.
ER  -