Heart Failure Outcomes in Primary Care: The Role of Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH) in German General Practice
- 1Institute of General Practice Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60590 Germany goethe-university-frankfurt.de
- 2Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology Ruhr University Bochum Bochum 44789 Germany ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Abstract
Background: Germany’s GP‐centred care (GPCC) model aims to strengthen coordinated primary care and incorporates delegated case management delivered by Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH). While previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects for patients with heart failure, the additional long‐term impact of multidisciplinary primary care incorporating VERAH support compared with GPCC alone remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using German statutory health insurance claims data from 2011 to 2022. Patients with heart failure were identified using validated ICD‐10 codes from inpatient and outpatient care records and assigned to three groups: usual care, GPCC and GP‐centred care with extended multidisciplinary team involvement (GPCC‐Plus). GPCC‐Plus was defined as a study‐specific category based on predefined VERAH‐related service codes and lump‐sum payments documented in AOK Baden‐Württemberg claims data. Outcomes included all‐cause hospitalisation, ambulatory care‐sensitive condition (ACSC) hospitalisations and all‐cause mortality. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities and healthcare utilisation, with time‐varying covariates included where applicable. Direct comparisons between GPCC and GPCC‐Plus were performed, and longitudinal trends were assessed over the 12‐year observation period.
Results: Both GPCC models were associated with reduced hospitalisations compared with usual care, with consistently stronger effects observed in GPCC‐Plus practices involving multidisciplinary team care including Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH). GPCC‐Plus demonstrated the lowest odds of all‐cause hospitalisation and mortality across the study period. ACSC hospitalisations showed modest declines in both GPCC groups. Longitudinal analyses indicated sustained benefits over time, with more pronounced and consistent improvements in the GPCC‐Plus group.
Conclusions: A coordinated, integrated, multidisciplinary primary care programme including delegated case management by Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH) is associated with sustained long‐term reductions in hospitalisations and mortality among patients with heart failure over 12 years. These findings suggest that integrating structured nonphysician workforce roles may enhance the effectiveness of GPCC beyond GP coordination alone.
Implications for Nursing Management: Structured delegated case management and multidisciplinary teamwork can support continuity of care for patients with heart failure. Clear roles and communication pathways facilitate the integration of nursing and practice‐based care into GPCC.
Related
- Baseline OCT Biomarkers and Early Outcomes After Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: Associations with Primary Failure and Visual Acuity After Successful Closure
- Long-term outcomes and impact of diagnostic coding of patients with heart failure identified in primary care: insights from the OSCAR-HF cohort.
- Status quo of change fatigue and influencing factors among nursing assistants in 21 general hospitals in Guangdong province under the "accompaniment⁃free care service" model
- Recognising Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer's Disease in General and Psychiatric Practice: Clinical Clues and Appropriate Referral
- “More than medicine — but when?” A qualitative study of how general practitioners assess, negotiate, and apply social prescribing in clinical practice
BibTeX
@article{karimova2026heart,
title = {{Heart Failure Outcomes in Primary Care: The Role of Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH) in German General Practice}},
author = {Kateryna Karimova and Anastasiya Glushan and Justyna Weronika Wünstel and Renate Klaaßen-Mielke and Catriona Friedmacher},
journal = {Journal of Nursing Management},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1155/jonm/6199599},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/6199599},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Heart Failure Outcomes in Primary Care: The Role of Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH) in German General Practice
AU - Kateryna Karimova
AU - Anastasiya Glushan
AU - Justyna Weronika Wünstel
AU - Renate Klaaßen-Mielke
AU - Catriona Friedmacher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
JO - Journal of Nursing Management
DO - 10.1155/jonm/6199599
UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/6199599
AB - Background: Germany’s GP‐centred care (GPCC) model aims to strengthen coordinated primary care and incorporates delegated case management delivered by Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH). While previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects for patients with heart failure, the additional long‐term impact of multidisciplinary primary care incorporating VERAH support compared with GPCC alone remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using German statutory health insurance claims data from 2011 to 2022. Patients with heart failure were identified using validated ICD‐10 codes from inpatient and outpatient care records and assigned to three groups: usual care, GPCC and GP‐centred care with extended multidisciplinary team involvement (GPCC‐Plus). GPCC‐Plus was defined as a study‐specific category based on predefined VERAH‐related service codes and lump‐sum payments documented in AOK Baden‐Württemberg claims data. Outcomes included all‐cause hospitalisation, ambulatory care‐sensitive condition (ACSC) hospitalisations and all‐cause mortality. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities and healthcare utilisation, with time‐varying covariates included where applicable. Direct comparisons between GPCC and GPCC‐Plus were performed, and longitudinal trends were assessed over the 12‐year observation period. Results: Both GPCC models were associated with reduced hospitalisations compared with usual care, with consistently stronger effects observed in GPCC‐Plus practices involving multidisciplinary team care including Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH). GPCC‐Plus demonstrated the lowest odds of all‐cause hospitalisation and mortality across the study period. ACSC hospitalisations showed modest declines in both GPCC groups. Longitudinal analyses indicated sustained benefits over time, with more pronounced and consistent improvements in the GPCC‐Plus group. Conclusions: A coordinated, integrated, multidisciplinary primary care programme including delegated case management by Primary Care Practice Assistants (VERAH) is associated with sustained long‐term reductions in hospitalisations and mortality among patients with heart failure over 12 years. These findings suggest that integrating structured nonphysician workforce roles may enhance the effectiveness of GPCC beyond GP coordination alone. Implications for Nursing Management: Structured delegated case management and multidisciplinary teamwork can support continuity of care for patients with heart failure. Clear roles and communication pathways facilitate the integration of nursing and practice‐based care into GPCC.
SN - 0966-0429
SN - 1365-2834
ER -