Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PeerJ

gTranslate: rapid and accurate translation table prediction for prokaryotic genomes

Abstract

Background: Bioinformatic tools often require the prediction of protein-coding genes to make inferences about prokaryotic genomes. Typically, the genetic code used for translating genes to proteins must be specified by the user based on the taxonomic classification of a genome assembly or, for some widely used tools, established using a heuristic rule based on gene coding densities. Manual specification is at best inconvenient, but more challenging is that many bioinformatic tools are applied before taxonomic classifications have been established making specifying the translation table impractical.

Methods: Here we provide a computationally efficient tool, gTranslate, that uses an ensemble of five machine learning methods to accurately predict translation tables for prokaryotic genomes. The feature vector used by gTranslate takes advantage of differences in gene coding densities when predicting genes under different translation tables along with features that consider the number and ratio of UGA stop codon reassignments to tryptophan or glycine. gTranslate is freely available at https://github.com/cmc-aau/gTranslate and archived on Zenodo.

Results: We demonstrate that gTranslate correctly predicts the translation table of prokaryotic genomes >99.99% of the time ( i.e. , <1 error per 10,000 genomes) and outperforms a more computationally expensive prediction method and a coding density heuristic used by popular bioinformatic tools. Using gTranslate, we identify a basal lineage of Ca. Stammera capleta that uses the standard bacterial genetic code instead of the UGA stop codon to tryptophan reassignment common to other members of this species. We also identify the first instances of UGA-to-tryptophan reassignment in the Patescibacteriota making this the first bacterial phylum with members capable of using translation tables 4, 11, and 25.

Related

  1. Annotation-aware multidomain validation of NucS and MutS-MutL across 23,435 prokaryotic reference genomes
    Kiarash Sadeghian Esfahani
    BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. Accurate prediction of CRISPR editing outcomes in somatic cell lines and zygotes with few-shot learning with inDecay.
    Weizhong Zheng, Lu Yu, Chao Wu +14
    Genome biologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. ESMDynamic: Fast and accurate prediction of protein dynamic contact maps from single sequences
    Diego E. Kleiman, Jiangyan Feng, Zhengyuan Xue +1
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND7 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  4. Leveraging secondary-structure information for accurate nucleic acid structure prediction with OFoldNA
    Valhalla Team
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textBiophysicsarXiv
  5. Accurate and efficient prediction of protein conformations with ProtMonomer
    Y. Si, S. Zhang, L. Chen
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{chaumeil2026gtranslate,
  title = {{gTranslate: rapid and accurate translation table prediction for prokaryotic genomes}},
  author = {Pierre-Alain Chaumeil and Philip Hugenholtz and Donovan H. Parks},
  journal = {PeerJ},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.7717/peerj.21825},
  url = {https://peerj.com/articles/21825},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - gTranslate: rapid and accurate translation table prediction for prokaryotic genomes
AU  - Pierre-Alain Chaumeil
AU  - Philip Hugenholtz
AU  - Donovan H. Parks
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - PeerJ
DO  - 10.7717/peerj.21825
UR  - https://peerj.com/articles/21825
AB  - Background: Bioinformatic tools often require the prediction of protein-coding genes to make inferences about prokaryotic genomes. Typically, the genetic code used for translating genes to proteins must be specified by the user based on the taxonomic classification of a genome assembly or, for some widely used tools, established using a heuristic rule based on gene coding densities. Manual specification is at best inconvenient, but more challenging is that many bioinformatic tools are applied before taxonomic classifications have been established making specifying the translation table impractical.  Methods: Here we provide a computationally efficient tool, gTranslate, that uses an ensemble of five machine learning methods to accurately predict translation tables for prokaryotic genomes. The feature vector used by gTranslate takes advantage of differences in gene coding densities when predicting genes under different translation tables along with features that consider the number and ratio of UGA stop codon reassignments to tryptophan or glycine. gTranslate is freely available at https://github.com/cmc-aau/gTranslate and archived on Zenodo.  Results: We demonstrate that gTranslate correctly predicts the translation table of prokaryotic genomes >99.99% of the time ( i.e. , <1 error per 10,000 genomes) and outperforms a more computationally expensive prediction method and a coding density heuristic used by popular bioinformatic tools. Using gTranslate, we identify a basal lineage of Ca. Stammera capleta that uses the standard bacterial genetic code instead of the UGA stop codon to tryptophan reassignment common to other members of this species. We also identify the first instances of UGA-to-tryptophan reassignment in the Patescibacteriota making this the first bacterial phylum with members capable of using translation tables 4, 11, and 25.
SN  - 2167-8359
ER  -