Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Ordinal Multi-Instance Learning for Automated Multi-Task Grading of Lumbar Degenerative Conditions on Sagittal MRI, with External Validation

  1. 1Department of Orthopedics, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

Abstract

PurposeLumbar spine MRI interpretation requires 25 structured severity judgments per examination -- five degenerative conditions at five disc levels, each on a three-level ordinal scale -- a time-consuming task with substantial inter-reader variability. We developed and externally validated a model that automates this complete scheme.

Materials and MethodsA full-sequence multi-instance learning (MIL) model -- ResNet34 backbone, bidirectional GRU, attention pooling over 24 uniformly sampled sagittal T2-weighted slices -- with 25 cumulative-logit ordinal heads was trained on 1,204 examinations from the multi-institutional RSNA 2024 LumbarDISC dataset and internally validated on 213 held-out examinations. External validation used 60 retrospectively collected patients from an independent Chinese university hospital (four scanner vendors, radiology reports as the reference standard, no fine-tuning). Agreement was assessed with exact accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, McNemar tests, and patient-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals.

ResultsThe ordinal model achieved 51.4% balanced accuracy internally (exact accuracy 65.1%), versus 16.3% for a single-slice baseline; severe-grade AUCs averaged 0.908 across conditions. Externally, it outperformed its softmax-weighted counterpart on exact accuracy (0.649 vs. 0.586; +6.3 percentage points, 95% CI +2.7 to +10.0) and sensitivity (0.868 vs. 0.833), with markedly fewer severe-grade false alarms (69 vs. 172 predicted severe cells; McNemar p<0.0001).

ConclusionA full-sequence MIL model with ordinal outputs automates the complete 25-task grading scheme on sagittal MRI and, in the first hospital external validation of such a model, reduced severe-grade over-prediction under domain shift without loss of sensitivity -- supporting its role as a screening and triage aid.

SummaryAn ordinal full-sequence multi-instance learning model graded all 25 lumbar MRI degeneration tasks and markedly reduced severe-grade false alarms in 60-patient hospital validation without loss of sensitivity.

Key PointsO_LIFull-sequence attention was indispensable: balanced accuracy rose from 16.3% (single-slice baseline) to 51.4% over 24 sagittal slices. C_LIO_LIIn external validation, ordinal outputs reduced severe-grade predictions from 172 to 69 of 900 cells (McNemar p<0.0001) with comparable ranking ability (AUC 0.835 vs. 0.829). C_LIO_LIThe Moderate grade remained the hardest class across all conditions (AUC 0.70-0.78), tracking known inter-reader variability at the mild-moderate boundary. C_LI

Related

  1. Preserving a decade of machine-learning validity across a ground-up refactoring: a five-tier automated validation of RCT-Reviewer, an independent modernization of RobotReviewer
    V. Sahu, A. Sahu
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Automated quantitative computed tomography grading of lumbar facet joint degeneration: influence of segmentation errors on instance-level clinical assessment.
    Baisen Chen, Yukang Cheng, Chunyan Ji +3
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  3. Multimodal Multiple Instance Learning for Fibroepithelial Tumor Diagnosis in Breast Ultrasound
    F. F. Abir, M. Ali, M. S. Hossain +5
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  4. Weakly-Supervised Detection of Facial Motor Tics in Video Data Using Score-Driven Top-k Multiple Instance Learning
    Nele Sophie Brügge, Frédéric Li, Ronja Schappert +6
    Journal of healthcare informatics researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. FragMIL: A Fragment-Token Multiple-Instance Learning Framework for Cancer Detection from Cell-Free DNA Fragmentomics
    Tien-Dung Bui, Yung-Feng Lin, Mai-Hanh Nguyen +3
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{geng2026ordinal,
  title = {{Ordinal Multi-Instance Learning for Automated Multi-Task Grading of Lumbar Degenerative Conditions on Sagittal MRI, with External Validation}},
  author = {S. Geng and Q. Miao and Q. Qin and H. Guo and X. Wang},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.20.26366005},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366005v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Ordinal Multi-Instance Learning for Automated Multi-Task Grading of Lumbar Degenerative Conditions on Sagittal MRI, with External Validation
AU  - S. Geng
AU  - Q. Miao
AU  - Q. Qin
AU  - H. Guo
AU  - X. Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.20.26366005
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366005v1
AB  - PurposeLumbar spine MRI interpretation requires 25 structured severity judgments per examination -- five degenerative conditions at five disc levels, each on a three-level ordinal scale -- a time-consuming task with substantial inter-reader variability. We developed and externally validated a model that automates this complete scheme.  Materials and MethodsA full-sequence multi-instance learning (MIL) model -- ResNet34 backbone, bidirectional GRU, attention pooling over 24 uniformly sampled sagittal T2-weighted slices -- with 25 cumulative-logit ordinal heads was trained on 1,204 examinations from the multi-institutional RSNA 2024 LumbarDISC dataset and internally validated on 213 held-out examinations. External validation used 60 retrospectively collected patients from an independent Chinese university hospital (four scanner vendors, radiology reports as the reference standard, no fine-tuning). Agreement was assessed with exact accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, McNemar tests, and patient-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals.  ResultsThe ordinal model achieved 51.4% balanced accuracy internally (exact accuracy 65.1%), versus 16.3% for a single-slice baseline; severe-grade AUCs averaged 0.908 across conditions. Externally, it outperformed its softmax-weighted counterpart on exact accuracy (0.649 vs. 0.586; +6.3 percentage points, 95% CI +2.7 to +10.0) and sensitivity (0.868 vs. 0.833), with markedly fewer severe-grade false alarms (69 vs. 172 predicted severe cells; McNemar p<0.0001).  ConclusionA full-sequence MIL model with ordinal outputs automates the complete 25-task grading scheme on sagittal MRI and, in the first hospital external validation of such a model, reduced severe-grade over-prediction under domain shift without loss of sensitivity -- supporting its role as a screening and triage aid.  SummaryAn ordinal full-sequence multi-instance learning model graded all 25 lumbar MRI degeneration tasks and markedly reduced severe-grade false alarms in 60-patient hospital validation without loss of sensitivity.  Key PointsO_LIFull-sequence attention was indispensable: balanced accuracy rose from 16.3% (single-slice baseline) to 51.4% over 24 sagittal slices. C_LIO_LIIn external validation, ordinal outputs reduced severe-grade predictions from 172 to 69 of 900 cells (McNemar p<0.0001) with comparable ranking ability (AUC 0.835 vs. 0.829). C_LIO_LIThe Moderate grade remained the hardest class across all conditions (AUC 0.70-0.78), tracking known inter-reader variability at the mild-moderate boundary. C_LI
ER  -