Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDResuscitation plus

Repeated self-directed CPR testing enhances compression depth: evidence from a large retrospective cohort.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, AZ Sint Lucas, Ghent, Belgium.
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  4. 4Emergency Medicine, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Abstract

Background

High-quality chest compressions are critical to survival after cardiac arrest, yet CPR skills decline after conventional training. Low-dose, high-frequency (LDHF) training may sustain competence, but large-scale longitudinal evidence from self-directed stations remains limited.Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of healthcare professionals completing at least two manikin-based CPR assessments between June 2023 and April 2026. Automated testing was performed using a self-directed manikin-based simulation station without real-time feedback. Mixed-effects models assessed associations of interval and test-day number with compression depth, rate, recoil, and guideline compliance. Sensitivity analyses modeled test-day number categorically and adjusted depth models for age and recorded sex.Results

Among 2558 participants (6232 tests), mean depth increased from 49.8 ± 9.2 mm on test day 1 to 52.5 ± 7.6 mm on test day 2 and remained within guideline targets thereafter; rate and recoil were stable. Interval had a negligible association with depth (0.027 mm per 30 days, p = 0.027) that was attenuated after demographic adjustment (p = 0.101). Per 30 days, interval was weakly associated with depth compliance, but not rate or combined compliance. Later test-day number was associated with higher depth (1.59 mm per test day, p < 0.001), with consistent categorical and adjusted findings.Conclusion

Later test-day number was consistently associated with higher depth, whereas interval explained little variation. Although the observational design cannot establish station effectiveness or an optimal refresher interval, this study provides one of the largest longitudinal descriptions of repeated self-directed CPR assessment in certified healthcare professionals.

Related

  1. Blood flow restriction of sport-specific repeated-sprint training enhances acute physiological responses in elite female boxers: a randomized, crossover trial
    Shenguang Li, Dexin Wang, Pedro G. Morouço +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  2. Heterologous contralateral repeated bout effect: eccentric knee extensor conditioning enhances neuromuscular fatigue resistance and attenuates muscle stiffness in contralateral elbow flexors in young women.
    Chung-Chan Hsieh, Szu-Kai Fu, Yu-Lin Ning +3
    Frontiers in physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Respiratory pathogen epidemiology in children under 5 years hospitalized with acute respiratory infections in Qingdao, China: a retrospective, single-center, repeated cross-sectional surveillance study
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Supplementation of Bacillus cereus Enhances Anti-Colitis Effects of Triple Probiotics in Mice: Correlative Evidence for a Gut Microbiota–Spermidine-Related Axis in Quadruple-Probiotic Protection
    Jixiang Li, Xuxu Du, Jing Zhao +5
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  5. Component-specific prognostic signals within a multidimensional classification for periprosthetic joint infection and the impact of repeated surgical episodes: a retrospective cohort study
    Yohei Kumabe, Kenichi Sawauchi, Yutaka Matsumiya +5
    Orthopedic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{charlier2026repeated,
  title = {{Repeated self-directed CPR testing enhances compression depth: evidence from a large retrospective cohort.}},
  author = {Nathalie Charlier and Nicolas Mpotos and Marc Sabbe},
  journal = {Resuscitation plus},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101519},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927095},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Repeated self-directed CPR testing enhances compression depth: evidence from a large retrospective cohort.
AU  - Nathalie Charlier
AU  - Nicolas Mpotos
AU  - Marc Sabbe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Resuscitation plus
DO  - 10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101519
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927095
AB  - Background  High-quality chest compressions are critical to survival after cardiac arrest, yet CPR skills decline after conventional training. Low-dose, high-frequency (LDHF) training may sustain competence, but large-scale longitudinal evidence from self-directed stations remains limited.Methods  We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of healthcare professionals completing at least two manikin-based CPR assessments between June 2023 and April 2026. Automated testing was performed using a self-directed manikin-based simulation station without real-time feedback. Mixed-effects models assessed associations of interval and test-day number with compression depth, rate, recoil, and guideline compliance. Sensitivity analyses modeled test-day number categorically and adjusted depth models for age and recorded sex.Results  Among 2558 participants (6232 tests), mean depth increased from 49.8 ± 9.2 mm on test day 1 to 52.5 ± 7.6 mm on test day 2 and remained within guideline targets thereafter; rate and recoil were stable. Interval had a negligible association with depth (0.027 mm per 30 days, p = 0.027) that was attenuated after demographic adjustment (p = 0.101). Per 30 days, interval was weakly associated with depth compliance, but not rate or combined compliance. Later test-day number was associated with higher depth (1.59 mm per test day, p < 0.001), with consistent categorical and adjusted findings.Conclusion  Later test-day number was consistently associated with higher depth, whereas interval explained little variation. Although the observational design cannot establish station effectiveness or an optimal refresher interval, this study provides one of the largest longitudinal descriptions of repeated self-directed CPR assessment in certified healthcare professionals.
SN  - 2666-5204
ER  -