Comparative Analysis of Progestin Intervention for Non-Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Females with Anovulation: A Retrospective Study.
6 affiliations
- 1Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- 2National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- 3Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- 4Beijing Key Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation in Frontier Technologies for Population Quality, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- 5State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- 6School of Basic Medical Sciences,Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Objective
To compare the efficacy of progestin intervention for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (non-atypical EH) in infertile patients with ovulatory dysfunction, and to explore factors associated with histological regression.Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary reproductive medicine center. A total of 171 infertile females with anovulation diagnosed with non-atypical EH by hysteroscopic biopsy between March 2021 and August 2024 were enrolled. Patients were divided into polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) group (n=89) and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) group (n=82) according to ovarian reserve function. All patients received 3-month oral progestin therapy. The study aims to analyze and compare the regression of endometrial hyperplasia after 3 months of treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze independent factors affecting treatment response.Results
After progestin treatment, the overall EH regression rate was 82.46%, with no significant difference between the DOR group (84.15%) and PCOS group (80.90%) (P=0.577). In the DOR subgroup, high-potency progestins achieved a significantly higher regression rate than dydrogesterone (89.83% vs 69.57%, P=0.040), while no such difference was found in the PCOS group (P=0.527). The clinical pregnancy rate (31.71% vs 48.31%, P=0.027) and live birth rate (14.63% vs 38.20%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the DOR group. But no significant association was observed between progestin type and clinical pregnancy (P = 0.097, OR = 0.586, 95% CI 0.312-1.101).Multivariate analysis revealed that lower body mass index (BMI) (OR=0.893, 95% CI: 0.809-0.985, P=0.024) and high-potency progestin regimen (OR=2.913, 95% CI: 1.147-7.400, P=0.025) were independent protective factors for EH regression.Conclusion
Progestin provides comparable histological regression for non-atypical EH in infertile females with anovulation. A potential benefit of high-potency progestins was observed among patients with DOR.
Related
- Comparative Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection Versus the 52-mg Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and the contribution of PTEN immunohistochemistry
- Is the Benefit of High-Potency Progestins for Endometrial Hyperplasia Specific to Diminished Ovarian Reserve? [Letter]
- Sentinel Lymph Node Assessment in Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia/Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Estradiol valerate-induced endometrial hyperplasia is associated with oxidative stress and inflammatory activation
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Analysis of Progestin Intervention for Non-Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Females with Anovulation: A Retrospective Study.}},
author = {Xinyu Zhang and Zhaowen Xu and Yang Wang and Ran Li and Xi Du and Ningning Pan and Caihong Ma},
journal = {Drug design, development and therapy},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2147/dddt.s634398},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903837},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Analysis of Progestin Intervention for Non-Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Females with Anovulation: A Retrospective Study.
AU - Xinyu Zhang
AU - Zhaowen Xu
AU - Yang Wang
AU - Ran Li
AU - Xi Du
AU - Ningning Pan
AU - Caihong Ma
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - Drug design, development and therapy
DO - 10.2147/dddt.s634398
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903837
AB - Objective To compare the efficacy of progestin intervention for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (non-atypical EH) in infertile patients with ovulatory dysfunction, and to explore factors associated with histological regression.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary reproductive medicine center. A total of 171 infertile females with anovulation diagnosed with non-atypical EH by hysteroscopic biopsy between March 2021 and August 2024 were enrolled. Patients were divided into polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) group (n=89) and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) group (n=82) according to ovarian reserve function. All patients received 3-month oral progestin therapy. The study aims to analyze and compare the regression of endometrial hyperplasia after 3 months of treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze independent factors affecting treatment response.Results After progestin treatment, the overall EH regression rate was 82.46%, with no significant difference between the DOR group (84.15%) and PCOS group (80.90%) (P=0.577). In the DOR subgroup, high-potency progestins achieved a significantly higher regression rate than dydrogesterone (89.83% vs 69.57%, P=0.040), while no such difference was found in the PCOS group (P=0.527). The clinical pregnancy rate (31.71% vs 48.31%, P=0.027) and live birth rate (14.63% vs 38.20%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the DOR group. But no significant association was observed between progestin type and clinical pregnancy (P = 0.097, OR = 0.586, 95% CI 0.312-1.101).Multivariate analysis revealed that lower body mass index (BMI) (OR=0.893, 95% CI: 0.809-0.985, P=0.024) and high-potency progestin regimen (OR=2.913, 95% CI: 1.147-7.400, P=0.025) were independent protective factors for EH regression.Conclusion Progestin provides comparable histological regression for non-atypical EH in infertile females with anovulation. A potential benefit of high-potency progestins was observed among patients with DOR.
SN - 1177-8881
ER -