Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Application of metagenomic sequencing to improve sessile serrated lesion detection using the faecal immunochemical test

  1. 1Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Abstract

Most population colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs use the faecal immunochemical test (FIT), which quantifies occult haemoglobin in faeces and has proven to be effective in detecting and reducing CRC incidence and mortality. Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) account for up to 30% of sporadic CRC, yet FIT has low sensitivity to detect them. Faecal microbial biomarkers may improve their detection, but FIT samples have not previously been used to study the SSL microbiome. We asked whether FIT samples preserve the faecal microbiome as accurately as fresh collection, and whether they can reveal a microbial signature of SSL. We first reanalysed a published dataset of paired FIT and fresh faecal samples from the same participants. Donor identity explained 63.5% of compositional variance compared with 16.7% for collection method, indicating that FIT preserves the donor-specific signature on which biomarker discovery depends. We then generated shotgun metagenomes from FIT samples of 24 adults scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy, twelve with at least one clinically significant SSL and twelve with no neoplasia (NN) and compared each group with a published fresh faeces cohort matched on colonoscopy outcome. Collection method explained 6.3% to 7.6% of variance, and no individual species was significantly differentially abundant between methods. Between SSL and NN FIT samples, community structure did not significantly differ, and conservative differential abundance analysis returned no results. More permissive count-based models suggested a depletion of fermentative commensals in SSL. Functionally, SSL samples encoded significantly fewer KEGG orthologs and less polyamine biosynthesis capacity, while orthologs carried by several Bifidobacterium species were more abundant. Many depleted functions reflected Enterobacteriaceae gene content concentrated in a few control samples. No single feature was diagnostic on its own. A multi-feature signature, confirmed in larger cohorts and applied to samples that screening programs already collect, may increase the detection rate of SSLs.

Related

  1. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing improves pathogen detection in culture-negative infections: a diagnostic performance study
    Hamsa T. Tayeb, Mohamed Abouelhoda, Abdulmohsen Alqasabi +5
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyCrossref
  2. Application and evaluation of nanopore targeted sequencing in the detection of bacterial and fungal pathogens in leukemia bloodstream infections.
    Qian Yao, Ling Tang, Daozi Jiang +1
    Frontiers in microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
  3. Analysis of structural modifications and metagenomic sequencing during the ensiling of Caragana korshinskii provides insights into how extrusion pretreatment promotes lignocellulose degradation
    Baochao Bai, Gentu Ge, Rui Qiu +7
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biologyNatureCrossref
  4. Benchmarking Microbiome Methods for Improved Metagenomic Sequencing of Lower Respiratory Tract Samples
    J. T. Sumner, E. M. Hartmann
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  5. Cerebrospinal fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing for culture-negative anaerobic central nervous system infection involving Prevotella oris: attribution challenges in low-biomass specimens
    Yan Li, Minghua Fan, Yuyuan Hu +4
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{hart2026application,
  title = {{Application of metagenomic sequencing to improve sessile serrated lesion detection using the faecal immunochemical test}},
  author = {B. J. Hart and G. Laven-Law and C. M. Harker and M. P. Doane and R. Parker and M. Menberu and C. Cock and R. A. Edwards and E. L. Symonds and J. M. Winter and M. J. Roach},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.04.764411},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.764411v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Application of metagenomic sequencing to improve sessile serrated lesion detection using the faecal immunochemical test
AU  - B. J. Hart
AU  - G. Laven-Law
AU  - C. M. Harker
AU  - M. P. Doane
AU  - R. Parker
AU  - M. Menberu
AU  - C. Cock
AU  - R. A. Edwards
AU  - E. L. Symonds
AU  - J. M. Winter
AU  - M. J. Roach
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.04.764411
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.764411v1
AB  - Most population colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs use the faecal immunochemical test (FIT), which quantifies occult haemoglobin in faeces and has proven to be effective in detecting and reducing CRC incidence and mortality. Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) account for up to 30% of sporadic CRC, yet FIT has low sensitivity to detect them. Faecal microbial biomarkers may improve their detection, but FIT samples have not previously been used to study the SSL microbiome. We asked whether FIT samples preserve the faecal microbiome as accurately as fresh collection, and whether they can reveal a microbial signature of SSL. We first reanalysed a published dataset of paired FIT and fresh faecal samples from the same participants. Donor identity explained 63.5% of compositional variance compared with 16.7% for collection method, indicating that FIT preserves the donor-specific signature on which biomarker discovery depends. We then generated shotgun metagenomes from FIT samples of 24 adults scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy, twelve with at least one clinically significant SSL and twelve with no neoplasia (NN) and compared each group with a published fresh faeces cohort matched on colonoscopy outcome. Collection method explained 6.3% to 7.6% of variance, and no individual species was significantly differentially abundant between methods. Between SSL and NN FIT samples, community structure did not significantly differ, and conservative differential abundance analysis returned no results. More permissive count-based models suggested a depletion of fermentative commensals in SSL. Functionally, SSL samples encoded significantly fewer KEGG orthologs and less polyamine biosynthesis capacity, while orthologs carried by several Bifidobacterium species were more abundant. Many depleted functions reflected Enterobacteriaceae gene content concentrated in a few control samples. No single feature was diagnostic on its own. A multi-feature signature, confirmed in larger cohorts and applied to samples that screening programs already collect, may increase the detection rate of SSLs.
ER  -