Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Repeated Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Protocol Disrupts Muscle-to-Brain Signaling in Rats

  1. 1Universite Bourgogne Europe, Inserm, CAPS UMR 1093, 21000 Dijon, France

Abstract

Objective. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is increasingly used to preserve or restore muscle function in patients unable to exercise, and acute NMES improves cognitive performance and increases hippocampal mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). However, the consequences of repeated sessions for muscle-to-brain signaling remain poorly understood. We examined whether seven consecutive days of quadriceps NMES would reproduce this acute response. Methods. Male Wistar rats received daily 30-min quadriceps NMES or SHAM sessions under isoflurane for seven consecutive days. Blood was collected immediately after the final session and 24 h later, when muscle and hippocampal tissues were also collected. An independent cohort underwent behavioral testing. Results. Repeated NMES increased serum creatine kinase activity and quadriceps fibrillar collagen deposition without altering muscle mass, myofiber size, or degeneration-regeneration markers. These changes were accompanied by low-grade systemic inflammation and corticosterone elevation persisting 24 h after the final session. In the hippocampus, NMES increased inflammatory cytokine expression, astrocytic and microglial markers, and glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation. Mature BDNF, TrkB phosphorylation and ERK1/2 signaling decreased, whereas proBDNF, p75NTR and JNK signaling increased; Akt and mTOR phosphorylation were unchanged. Synaptophysin, GAP43 and PSD95 also decreased. NMES increased marble burying and forced-swim immobility, without detectable changes in locomotion, recognition memory, or neuronal profile density. Conclusions. Repeated daily NMES engaged a distinct, maladaptive mode of muscle-to-brain signaling rather than reproducing the benefits reported after acute stimulation. Stimulation parameters and recovery intervals that avoid this response need to be defined before repeated NMES can be recommended as an exercise substitute.

Related

  1. Gait-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation as an adjunct to an offloading knee brace in medial knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Mohadeseh Jafarian, Amin Komeili, Reza Salehi +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  2. Lower‐limb neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for adults with kidney failure undergoing dialysis
    Louise Beresford, Louise C Burgess, Susan Dewhurst +3
    The Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy for snoring and mild sleep apnea
    M. R. Crawford, A. L. Jones, S. Parthasarathy +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  4. Association between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and intermittent pneumatic compression for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis among neurosurgery patients
    Ling-Ling Wang, Li Ye, Li-Juan Rong +7
    Annals of MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  5. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus sham stimulation and dexamethasone versus amisulpride for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: protocol for a randomized 2 × 2 factorial trial
    Yu Li, Jun Zhang, Yu Xu +5
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{wirtz2026repeated,
  title = {{Repeated Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Protocol Disrupts Muscle-to-Brain Signaling in Rats}},
  author = {J. Wirtz and Y. Wang and R. Chaney and L. Wirtz and Q. Drezet and C. Papaxanthis and A. Quirie and A. Meloux and S. Lemaire and M. Cefis and A. Tessier and P. Garnier},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.757107},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757107v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Repeated Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Protocol Disrupts Muscle-to-Brain Signaling in Rats
AU  - J. Wirtz
AU  - Y. Wang
AU  - R. Chaney
AU  - L. Wirtz
AU  - Q. Drezet
AU  - C. Papaxanthis
AU  - A. Quirie
AU  - A. Meloux
AU  - S. Lemaire
AU  - M. Cefis
AU  - A. Tessier
AU  - P. Garnier
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.07.757107
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757107v1
AB  - Objective. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is increasingly used to preserve or restore muscle function in patients unable to exercise, and acute NMES improves cognitive performance and increases hippocampal mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). However, the consequences of repeated sessions for muscle-to-brain signaling remain poorly understood. We examined whether seven consecutive days of quadriceps NMES would reproduce this acute response. Methods. Male Wistar rats received daily 30-min quadriceps NMES or SHAM sessions under isoflurane for seven consecutive days. Blood was collected immediately after the final session and 24 h later, when muscle and hippocampal tissues were also collected. An independent cohort underwent behavioral testing. Results. Repeated NMES increased serum creatine kinase activity and quadriceps fibrillar collagen deposition without altering muscle mass, myofiber size, or degeneration-regeneration markers. These changes were accompanied by low-grade systemic inflammation and corticosterone elevation persisting 24 h after the final session. In the hippocampus, NMES increased inflammatory cytokine expression, astrocytic and microglial markers, and glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation. Mature BDNF, TrkB phosphorylation and ERK1/2 signaling decreased, whereas proBDNF, p75NTR and JNK signaling increased; Akt and mTOR phosphorylation were unchanged. Synaptophysin, GAP43 and PSD95 also decreased. NMES increased marble burying and forced-swim immobility, without detectable changes in locomotion, recognition memory, or neuronal profile density. Conclusions. Repeated daily NMES engaged a distinct, maladaptive mode of muscle-to-brain signaling rather than reproducing the benefits reported after acute stimulation. Stimulation parameters and recovery intervals that avoid this response need to be defined before repeated NMES can be recommended as an exercise substitute.
ER  -