Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDAnnals of Oncology

Lorlatinib versus crizotinib as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: 7-year update from the phase III CROWN study

4 more authors
14 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, USA. Electronic address: [email protected]
  2. 2Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  4. 4Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Greco-Hainsworth Centers for Research, Nashville, USA
  5. 5Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
  6. 6Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  7. 7Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China
  8. 8Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
  9. 9Thoracic Oncology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
  10. 10Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  11. 11Translational Oncology, Pfizer, La Jolla, USA
  12. 12Oncology Drug Development, Pfizer, Milan, Italy
  13. 13Oncology Lung Cancer, Pfizer, Paris, France
  14. 14Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of South China, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, China

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the unprecedented progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with lorlatinib after 5 years of follow-up in the phase III CROWN study, we aimed to quantify long-term outcomes at 7 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naive patients (N = 296) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once a day (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice a day (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 83.0 and 77.2 months, median PFS was not reached (NR) with lorlatinib [95% confidence interval (CI), 68.5-NR] and was 9.1 months (95% CI 7.4-10.9) with crizotinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.26]; 7-year PFS was 55% and 3%, respectively. With lorlatinib, patients without a PFS event at the end of 24 months had a 79% probability of survival without progression at year 7. No new intracranial progression events occurred after the first 30 months on lorlatinib. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI NR-NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI 12.7-21.9) with crizotinib (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.12). Overall survival follow-up is ongoing; the number of events for a protocol-specified analysis has not been met. The safety profile was consistent with the 5-year results. With lorlatinib, treatment-related adverse events did not lead to discontinuations after the first 26 months. More genetic alterations were detected in circulating tumor DNA samples from early progressors than in long-term responders on lorlatinib; new potential resistance mechanisms were identified. CONCLUSIONS: With median PFS yet to be reached after 7 years of follow-up in CROWN, lorlatinib continues to show unprecedented long-term benefit in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Patients without progression within 24 months on lorlatinib have a low risk of progression or death at year 7 and may continue long-term treatment. Findings suggest that sustained long-term disease control with first-line lorlatinib may enable advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to evolve toward a chronic condition.

Related

  1. Lorlatinib in frontline treatment of advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a highly efficient new standard of care but still challenging to manage
    Mylène Wespiser, Aurélie Swalduz, Maurice Pérol
    Translational Lung Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDGeneral biologyOncologyHAL
  2. Adjuvant alectinib versus crizotinib in completely resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study
    Translational Lung Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Probable Stevens–Johnson Syndrome During Taletrectinib Treatment After Crizotinib‐Related Rash in ROS1‐Positive Lung Cancer
    Hirotoshi Yasui, Ryo Fukaura, Miyu Misaki +10
    Respirology case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Clinical and radiographic improvement in suspected pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis-associated hypoxemic respiratory failure following iruplinalkib-based treatment in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma after sequential treatment with ensartinib and lorlatinib: a two-patient case report
    Hanbin Lin, Yuxiong Hu, Haoqiang Li +5
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced ER/PR-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: An Updated Single-Center Analysis of Real-World Data
    Anna-Christina Rambow, Tim Jannik Schröder, Gudrun Wagenpfeil +6
    Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{shaw2026lorlatinib,
  title = {{Lorlatinib versus crizotinib as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: 7-year update from the phase III CROWN study}},
  author = {Alice Tsang Shaw and Benjamin Solomon and Enriqueta Felip and Todd Michael Bauer and G. Liu and Y. Goto and Yan Wu and R.A. Soo and Julien Mazières and D G Kim and I.‐M. Wang and Jolanda Paolini and Anna Polli and N. Rifi and Francesca Toffalorio and T.S.K. Mok},
  journal = {Annals of Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1016/j.annonc.2026.05.692},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2026.05.692},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Lorlatinib versus crizotinib as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: 7-year update from the phase III CROWN study
AU  - Alice Tsang Shaw
AU  - Benjamin Solomon
AU  - Enriqueta Felip
AU  - Todd Michael Bauer
AU  - G. Liu
AU  - Y. Goto
AU  - Yan Wu
AU  - R.A. Soo
AU  - Julien Mazières
AU  - D G Kim
AU  - I.‐M. Wang
AU  - Jolanda Paolini
AU  - Anna Polli
AU  - N. Rifi
AU  - Francesca Toffalorio
AU  - T.S.K. Mok
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/29
JO  - Annals of Oncology
DO  - 10.1016/j.annonc.2026.05.692
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2026.05.692
AB  - BACKGROUND: Due to the unprecedented progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with lorlatinib after 5 years of follow-up in the phase III CROWN study, we aimed to quantify long-term outcomes at 7 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naive patients (N = 296) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once a day (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice a day (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 83.0 and 77.2 months, median PFS was not reached (NR) with lorlatinib [95% confidence interval (CI), 68.5-NR] and was 9.1 months (95% CI 7.4-10.9) with crizotinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.26]; 7-year PFS was 55% and 3%, respectively. With lorlatinib, patients without a PFS event at the end of 24 months had a 79% probability of survival without progression at year 7. No new intracranial progression events occurred after the first 30 months on lorlatinib. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI NR-NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI 12.7-21.9) with crizotinib (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.12). Overall survival follow-up is ongoing; the number of events for a protocol-specified analysis has not been met. The safety profile was consistent with the 5-year results. With lorlatinib, treatment-related adverse events did not lead to discontinuations after the first 26 months. More genetic alterations were detected in circulating tumor DNA samples from early progressors than in long-term responders on lorlatinib; new potential resistance mechanisms were identified. CONCLUSIONS: With median PFS yet to be reached after 7 years of follow-up in CROWN, lorlatinib continues to show unprecedented long-term benefit in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Patients without progression within 24 months on lorlatinib have a low risk of progression or death at year 7 and may continue long-term treatment. Findings suggest that sustained long-term disease control with first-line lorlatinib may enable advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to evolve toward a chronic condition.
SN  - 0923-7534
SN  - 1569-8041
ER  -