Postpartum contraception receipt among Oregon Medicaid-funded births with stimulant and substance use disorder.
5 affiliations
- 1Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, Oregon, 97201, USA. [email protected].
- 2OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA. [email protected].
- 3Care Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA.
- 4Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, Oregon, 97201, USA.
- 5Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
Objective
To compare postpartum contraceptive receipt among (i) Medicaid beneficiaries with stimulant-related substance use disorder (SUD) to those without SUD; and (ii) Medicaid beneficiaries with other SUD to those without SUD.Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of birthing events using Oregon's linked Medicaid claims and vital statistics data 2012-2019 (N = 141,479). We described demographic characteristics, birth outcomes, and substances used, and compared rates of contraception receipt (i) immediately postpartum (IPP), (ii) within 60 days postpartum excluding IPP, and (iii) within 60 days postpartum including IPP.Results
Prevalence of stimulant-related and other SUD diagnosis was 3.8% and 9.4%, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, contraception receipt within 60 days postpartum including IPP and contraception receipt IPP were greater for birth events with a stimulant-related SUD compared to birth events without SUD (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 60-days postpartum including IPP: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.17; aRR, IPP: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.24-1.40). Adjusted rates of contraception receipt were also elevated for birth events with other SUD compared to birth events with no SUD (aRR, 60-days postpartum including IPP: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09-1.15; aRR, IPP: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.16-1.26; aRR, 60-days postpartum excluding IPP: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06-1.13).Conclusions
Birthing people enrolled in Medicaid who misused stimulants were more likely than those without SUD, controlling for relevant factors, to receive postpartum contraception within 60 days due to elevated contraception receipt during the IPP period. Further research may examine whether these findings can be replicated outside of Oregon.
Related
- Trajectories of insomnia and anhedonia during early substance use treatment across opioid, stimulant, and opioid–stimulant co-use
- Performance in play: stimulant exposure and broader substance-use vulnerability in mass-participation youth esports.
- Social-ecological factors shaping women’s postpartum permanent contraception decision-making: Qualitative insights from a multi-site study
- Postpartum integration of infant vaccines and contraception through gender transformative programming: A cluster randomized trial in India
- Experiences of Mothers Following the Medicaid Postpartum Extension
BibTeX
@article{lindner2026postpartum,
title = {{Postpartum contraception receipt among Oregon Medicaid-funded births with stimulant and substance use disorder.}},
author = {Stephan R Lindner and Menolly Kaufman and Ann Martinez Acevedo and Deborah J Cohen},
journal = {Reproductive health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12978-026-02420-y},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902305},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Postpartum contraception receipt among Oregon Medicaid-funded births with stimulant and substance use disorder.
AU - Stephan R Lindner
AU - Menolly Kaufman
AU - Ann Martinez Acevedo
AU - Deborah J Cohen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Reproductive health
DO - 10.1186/s12978-026-02420-y
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902305
AB - Objective To compare postpartum contraceptive receipt among (i) Medicaid beneficiaries with stimulant-related substance use disorder (SUD) to those without SUD; and (ii) Medicaid beneficiaries with other SUD to those without SUD.Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of birthing events using Oregon's linked Medicaid claims and vital statistics data 2012-2019 (N = 141,479). We described demographic characteristics, birth outcomes, and substances used, and compared rates of contraception receipt (i) immediately postpartum (IPP), (ii) within 60 days postpartum excluding IPP, and (iii) within 60 days postpartum including IPP.Results Prevalence of stimulant-related and other SUD diagnosis was 3.8% and 9.4%, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, contraception receipt within 60 days postpartum including IPP and contraception receipt IPP were greater for birth events with a stimulant-related SUD compared to birth events without SUD (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 60-days postpartum including IPP: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.17; aRR, IPP: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.24-1.40). Adjusted rates of contraception receipt were also elevated for birth events with other SUD compared to birth events with no SUD (aRR, 60-days postpartum including IPP: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09-1.15; aRR, IPP: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.16-1.26; aRR, 60-days postpartum excluding IPP: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06-1.13).Conclusions Birthing people enrolled in Medicaid who misused stimulants were more likely than those without SUD, controlling for relevant factors, to receive postpartum contraception within 60 days due to elevated contraception receipt during the IPP period. Further research may examine whether these findings can be replicated outside of Oregon.
SN - 1742-4755
ER -