Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYChemical Society reviews

Label-free Raman spectroscopy for cancer therapy response: from methodological framework to clinical translation.

7 affiliations
  1. 1CNR-Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies (CNR-IFN), P.zza Leonardo Da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy. [email protected].
  2. 2Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, P.zza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  3. 3Laser Biomedical Research Center, G. R. Harrison Spectroscopy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
  4. 4Clinical Biophotonics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  5. 5Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  6. 6Laboratory of Nanomedicine, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
  7. 7Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Abstract

The early detection of therapy-induced biomolecular changes and the prediction of therapeutic response remain major challenges in oncology. Current clinical methods often assess treatment response through macroscopic or morphological endpoints, whereas molecular alterations associated with sensitivity, resistance, or recurrence may arise earlier and remain undetected. Raman spectroscopy offers a label-free and non-destructive approach to probe the intrinsic biochemical composition of cells, tissues, and biofluids, providing spectral and spatial information that can support therapy response prediction and longitudinal monitoring. This review discusses Raman-based technologies for cancer therapy assessment, from preclinical models to emerging clinical applications. We first outline the clinical need for rapid, non-destructive, and molecularly informative tools, considering tumor heterogeneity, therapy resistance, the tumor microenvironment, and current standards for response evaluation. We then provide a methodological framework for selecting Raman modalities, including spontaneous Raman (SR) spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), stimulated Raman spectroscopy (SRS), and coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS), together with key considerations on acquisition strategies, multimodal integration, experimental design, preprocessing, feature analysis, and machine learning. We summarize Raman spectral biomarkers associated with therapy-induced changes in nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, metabolites, extracellular matrix components, and anticancer drugs, and critically examine studies using Raman spectroscopy to predict or monitor responses to major therapeutic approaches. Finally, we discuss barriers to clinical translation, including acquisition speed, inter-instrument reproducibility, preclinical model limitations, regulatory requirements, workflow integration, clinical trials, and prospective validation. Overall, Raman spectroscopy emerges as a promising platform for molecular phenotyping in precision oncology, provided that future studies progress toward standardized, clinically validated, and actionable workflows.

Related

  1. Rethinking the tumor microbiome: Methodological challenges and a framework for rigorous research.
    Lingxuan Zhu, Zhixing Deng, Weiming Mou +11
    MLifePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCPMC
  2. Flow Cytometry and AI-Driven Biomarker Discovery in Acute Kidney Injury: From Mechanistic Insights to Translation Applications in Clinical and Austere Environments
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  3. Targeted protein degradation: bridging chemical biology and clinical translation
    Yu-bo Zhang, Jun-wei Fu, Yue Liu +7
    Acta Pharmacologica SinicaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text2 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  4. NEDD4-1: from molecular mechanisms to clinical translation in human diseases
    Haifen Tian, Yongsheng Huang, Yun Liang +4
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. The dual role of small EVs in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: from pathogenesis to clinical translation
    Jun Li, Zhouqiang Li, Haining Hu +3
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{alcolearodriguez2026labelfree,
  title = {{Label-free Raman spectroscopy for cancer therapy response: from methodological framework to clinical translation.}},
  author = {Victor Alcolea-Rodriguez and Arianna Bresci and Anna Mühlig and Chiara Agrimi and Carlo Morasso and Dario Polli and Orlando Guntinas-Lichius and Renzo Vanna},
  journal = {Chemical Society reviews},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1039/d6cs00966b},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42949705},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Label-free Raman spectroscopy for cancer therapy response: from methodological framework to clinical translation.
AU  - Victor Alcolea-Rodriguez
AU  - Arianna Bresci
AU  - Anna Mühlig
AU  - Chiara Agrimi
AU  - Carlo Morasso
AU  - Dario Polli
AU  - Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
AU  - Renzo Vanna
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Chemical Society reviews
DO  - 10.1039/d6cs00966b
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42949705
AB  - The early detection of therapy-induced biomolecular changes and the prediction of therapeutic response remain major challenges in oncology. Current clinical methods often assess treatment response through macroscopic or morphological endpoints, whereas molecular alterations associated with sensitivity, resistance, or recurrence may arise earlier and remain undetected. Raman spectroscopy offers a label-free and non-destructive approach to probe the intrinsic biochemical composition of cells, tissues, and biofluids, providing spectral and spatial information that can support therapy response prediction and longitudinal monitoring. This review discusses Raman-based technologies for cancer therapy assessment, from preclinical models to emerging clinical applications. We first outline the clinical need for rapid, non-destructive, and molecularly informative tools, considering tumor heterogeneity, therapy resistance, the tumor microenvironment, and current standards for response evaluation. We then provide a methodological framework for selecting Raman modalities, including spontaneous Raman (SR) spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), stimulated Raman spectroscopy (SRS), and coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS), together with key considerations on acquisition strategies, multimodal integration, experimental design, preprocessing, feature analysis, and machine learning. We summarize Raman spectral biomarkers associated with therapy-induced changes in nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, metabolites, extracellular matrix components, and anticancer drugs, and critically examine studies using Raman spectroscopy to predict or monitor responses to major therapeutic approaches. Finally, we discuss barriers to clinical translation, including acquisition speed, inter-instrument reproducibility, preclinical model limitations, regulatory requirements, workflow integration, clinical trials, and prospective validation. Overall, Raman spectroscopy emerges as a promising platform for molecular phenotyping in precision oncology, provided that future studies progress toward standardized, clinically validated, and actionable workflows.
SN  - 0306-0012
SN  - 1460-4744
ER  -