Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Self-organized division of labor and selection for long-term antiviral defense in CRISPR arrays.

  1. 1Centro de Astrobiología (CAB, CSIC-INTA), Madrid, Spain

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive immunity system that protects prokaryotes from viruses and other genetic parasites. CRISPR-Cas immunity is guided by short DNA sequences, called spacers, that are acquired upon encounters with parasites and stored in the CRISPR array. Although the mechanisms driving spacer acquisition are relatively well understood, the timespan of CRISPR immune memory and, consequently, the very nature of CRISPR-Cas as a short-term or long-term defense mechanism remain controversial. Because CRISPR arrays have limited size, CRISPR-Cas systems face a fundamental trade-off between acquiring new spacers against recent infections and retaining old spacers for long-term defense. To investigate how CRISPR-Cas systems resolve this "fast response-versus-memory" trade-off, we developed a stochastic model that captures CRISPR array dynamics under varying abundances of endemic and episodic viruses. Simulations reveal three distinct evolutionary regimes that result in short-term, long-term, and "dual memory" arrays. These regimes are governed by the ratio of two measurable parameters: the length of the CRISPR array and the time required for transient epidemics to decay below basal endemic viral abundance. Spontaneous division of labor emerges in the dual memory regime, with spacers near the leader and distal ends specialized in short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Within-array division of labor results in a U-shaped longitudinal profile for the probability of finding the targets of CRISPR immunity among the local virome. Such profiles, that have been empirically observed in CRISPR arrays from the human gut microbiome, could inform future research on the environmental persistence of poorly characterized viromes.

Related

  1. Nanochiral graphene quantum dots preferentially target virus-organized membrane states for host-sparing antiviral activity
    Y. Liu, M. Maleki, P. Perez-Romero +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  2. SIR2-mediated filament assembly activates the NLR-like protein Avs5 for bacterial antiviral defense
    Chen Wang, Jiale Xie, Zhangfei Shen +5
    Cell ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0ImmunologyCrossref
  3. Neuronal STAT1 as a phase switch from antiviral defense to synaptopathy in encephalitis
    Giovanni Di Liberto, Doron Merkler
    Trends in NeurosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYImmunologyHAL
  4. A microbiota-bile acid-immune axis orchestrates intestinal antiviral defense: CDCA-to-UDCA biotransformation by Limosilactobacillus reuteri LRM2293 is associated with PEDV resistance.
    Ling Sui, Qing Xiang, Yuning Kou +6
    BMC veterinary researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMCPMC
  5. Non-coding RNA-mediated tug-of-war between emerging viruses and host antiviral defense: lessons from animal viruses.
    Na Chen, Baoge Zhang, Ziding Yu +4
    Emerging microbes & infectionsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{martinreina2026selforganized,
  title = {{Self-organized division of labor and selection for long-term antiviral defense in CRISPR arrays.}},
  author = {J. Martin-Reina and J. Iranzo},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.22.753571},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.753571v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Self-organized division of labor and selection for long-term antiviral defense in CRISPR arrays.
AU  - J. Martin-Reina
AU  - J. Iranzo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.22.753571
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.753571v1
AB  - CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive immunity system that protects prokaryotes from viruses and other genetic parasites. CRISPR-Cas immunity is guided by short DNA sequences, called spacers, that are acquired upon encounters with parasites and stored in the CRISPR array. Although the mechanisms driving spacer acquisition are relatively well understood, the timespan of CRISPR immune memory and, consequently, the very nature of CRISPR-Cas as a short-term or long-term defense mechanism remain controversial. Because CRISPR arrays have limited size, CRISPR-Cas systems face a fundamental trade-off between acquiring new spacers against recent infections and retaining old spacers for long-term defense. To investigate how CRISPR-Cas systems resolve this "fast response-versus-memory" trade-off, we developed a stochastic model that captures CRISPR array dynamics under varying abundances of endemic and episodic viruses. Simulations reveal three distinct evolutionary regimes that result in short-term, long-term, and "dual memory" arrays. These regimes are governed by the ratio of two measurable parameters: the length of the CRISPR array and the time required for transient epidemics to decay below basal endemic viral abundance. Spontaneous division of labor emerges in the dual memory regime, with spacers near the leader and distal ends specialized in short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Within-array division of labor results in a U-shaped longitudinal profile for the probability of finding the targets of CRISPR immunity among the local virome. Such profiles, that have been empirically observed in CRISPR arrays from the human gut microbiome, could inform future research on the environmental persistence of poorly characterized viromes.
ER  -