Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Confidence Horizons

Abstract

Anytime-valid inference enables analysts to continuously monitor their data and stop experiments early. However, the majority of these methods incur a certain conservativeness by remaining valid on infinite time horizons. In practice, a bound on the horizon may be imposed due to budgetary, practical, or ethical constraints. In this paper, we ask the question: "Is it possible to obtain sharper large-sample anytime-valid inference by forgoing validity beyond some finite time horizon?". We provide a positive answer to this question by proposing a family of statistical objects that we call "confidence horizons". These objects can be viewed as large-sample confidence sequences on bounded time horizons, or alternatively as group sequential repeated confidence intervals with a maximal number of interim peeking times. We make explicit connections to the group sequential boundaries of Pocock [1977], O'Brien--Fleming [1979], and Wang--Tsiatis [1987]. We derive closed-form distribution functions of certain statistics which can be used to calculate the asymptotic quantiles of confidence horizons exactly, sidestepping the repeated integration typically employed in group sequential methods. We illustrate the use of confidence horizons for treatment effect estimation in sequentially randomized experiments under adaptive Neyman allocation.

Related

  1. Optimal Actuator Design across Ranks and Control Horizons
    Emmanuel Trélat, Enrique Zuazua
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  2. Stochastic motion of massless particles near event horizons in Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström spacetimes
    Yinhan Huang, Lezhen Miao, Xiao Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Reflected BSDEs under random horizons: Sharp support criteria, irregular reflection, and Cox reconstruction
    Youssef Ouknine, Badr Elmansouri
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  4. Asymptotics of Killing horizons: A Characterization in de Sitter Spacetime
    Carlos Peón-Nieto
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. No cosmic horizons from a strengthened higher-dimensional strong energy condition
    Flavio Tonioni
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyMathematical physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mathis2026confidence,
  title = {{Confidence Horizons}},
  author = {Chase Mathis and Ian Waudby-Smith},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.03889},
  eprint = {2608.03889},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03889},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Confidence Horizons
AU  - Chase Mathis
AU  - Ian Waudby-Smith
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.03889
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03889
AB  - Anytime-valid inference enables analysts to continuously monitor their data and stop experiments early. However, the majority of these methods incur a certain conservativeness by remaining valid on infinite time horizons. In practice, a bound on the horizon may be imposed due to budgetary, practical, or ethical constraints. In this paper, we ask the question: "Is it possible to obtain sharper large-sample anytime-valid inference by forgoing validity beyond some finite time horizon?". We provide a positive answer to this question by proposing a family of statistical objects that we call "confidence horizons". These objects can be viewed as large-sample confidence sequences on bounded time horizons, or alternatively as group sequential repeated confidence intervals with a maximal number of interim peeking times. We make explicit connections to the group sequential boundaries of Pocock [1977], O'Brien--Fleming [1979], and Wang--Tsiatis [1987]. We derive closed-form distribution functions of certain statistics which can be used to calculate the asymptotic quantiles of confidence horizons exactly, sidestepping the repeated integration typically employed in group sequential methods. We illustrate the use of confidence horizons for treatment effect estimation in sequentially randomized experiments under adaptive Neyman allocation.
ER  -