Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,095 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Evaluating the Effect of Chromatographic Chelator Modifiers on Metabolite Levels in Untargeted Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

  1. 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States

Abstract

Metal-sensitive metabolites frequently exhibit poor chromatographic performance during liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) due to analyte interactions with stainless-steel components of the chromatographic system. Although mobile phase chelators are widely used to improve targeted analyses, their broader effects on untargeted metabolomics remain unclear. We systematically evaluated the impact of chromatographic chelator modifiers on untargeted LC-MS detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa secondary metabolites using the metal-chelating quorum-sensing molecule Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal (PQS) as a model analyte. Analysis of publicly available metabolomics data sets revealed substantial variability in PQS chromatographic performance across laboratories. From this observation, we hypothesized that metal-mediated adsorption may contribute to inconsistent detection of PQS. We compared the effects of EDTA and citrate as mobile phase additives on P. aeruginosa metabolite detection across multiple culture media. Both chelators markedly improved PQS peak shape and enhanced detection of PQS and the siderophore pyochelin. However, high concentrations of EDTA caused ion suppression, altered adduct formation, and reduced detection of several metabolite classes, including phenazines and rhamnolipids, while citrate eliminated detection of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA). Reducing EDTA concentration to low micromolar levels largely preserved chromatographic improvements while minimizing adverse effects on metabolite coverage, although suppression of PCA persisted. These trends were consistent across chemically distinct growth media. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that mobile phase chelators substantially influence untargeted metabolomic profiles beyond improving chromatography. Careful selection of chelator identity and concentration is therefore essential to balance chromatographic performance with comprehensive metabolite detection in untargeted LC-MS analyses of metal-sensitive metabolites.

Related

  1. An Annotation Consistency Checker for Evidence-Based Evaluation of Untargeted LC-MS/MS Metabolite Annotations
    Wilhan D. G. Nunes, Edward J. Mathias, Charles Terra +4
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationChemRxiv
  2. TLQ Method: A Tandem Mixing-Linear Deduction-Quantile Weighted Median Framework for Robust Differential Metabolite Screening in LCMS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics
    Teng Teng, Yuchun Lu, Tonglei Qiao +2
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationChemRxiv
  3. Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling of Growth-Year-Associated Changes in Relative Metabolite Abundance in Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Tuberous Roots
    Mingli Ye, Boya Liu, Xin Li +5
    MetabolitesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Proteomics & metabolomicsCrossref
  4. Direct large-volume injection with liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry for screening of bacterial growth substrates in tap water
    Yutaro Uehara, Ikuro Kasuga, Futoshi Kurisu
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationChemRxiv
  5. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry for the characterization of methylated oligoribonucleotides
    Khaoula Adouairi, Carole Farre, Carole Chaix +2
    Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full text1 citedProteomics & metabolomicsGeneral biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{breiner2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating the Effect of Chromatographic Chelator Modifiers on Metabolite Levels in Untargeted Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry}},
  author = {Daniel J. Breiner and Vanessa V. Phelan},
  journal = {Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1021/jasms.6c00299},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.6c00299},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating the Effect of Chromatographic Chelator Modifiers on Metabolite Levels in Untargeted Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
AU  - Daniel J. Breiner
AU  - Vanessa V. Phelan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
DO  - 10.1021/jasms.6c00299
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.6c00299
AB  - Metal-sensitive metabolites frequently exhibit poor chromatographic performance during liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) due to analyte interactions with stainless-steel components of the chromatographic system. Although mobile phase chelators are widely used to improve targeted analyses, their broader effects on untargeted metabolomics remain unclear. We systematically evaluated the impact of chromatographic chelator modifiers on untargeted LC-MS detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa secondary metabolites using the metal-chelating quorum-sensing molecule Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal (PQS) as a model analyte. Analysis of publicly available metabolomics data sets revealed substantial variability in PQS chromatographic performance across laboratories. From this observation, we hypothesized that metal-mediated adsorption may contribute to inconsistent detection of PQS. We compared the effects of EDTA and citrate as mobile phase additives on P. aeruginosa metabolite detection across multiple culture media. Both chelators markedly improved PQS peak shape and enhanced detection of PQS and the siderophore pyochelin. However, high concentrations of EDTA caused ion suppression, altered adduct formation, and reduced detection of several metabolite classes, including phenazines and rhamnolipids, while citrate eliminated detection of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA). Reducing EDTA concentration to low micromolar levels largely preserved chromatographic improvements while minimizing adverse effects on metabolite coverage, although suppression of PCA persisted. These trends were consistent across chemically distinct growth media. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that mobile phase chelators substantially influence untargeted metabolomic profiles beyond improving chromatography. Careful selection of chelator identity and concentration is therefore essential to balance chromatographic performance with comprehensive metabolite detection in untargeted LC-MS analyses of metal-sensitive metabolites.
SN  - 1044-0305
SN  - 1879-1123
ER  -