From social media engagement to public health action: the role of social media in sustainable malaria elimination
Abstract
BackgroundMalaria remains a major global public health challenge, for which conventional malaria prevention and elimination depend on malaria-related knowledge, perceptions, behaviors, and public responses, but in reality, they require integrated surveillance, community engagement, behavioral change, and the rapid translation of evidence into context-specific public health action. Social media has emerged as an important module involving communities in intervention design and implementation, but evidence remains fragmented across measurable malaria outcomes and analytics.ObjectiveTo map and synthesize the available evidence using social media for the malaria elimination continuum, limitations, and gaps, and to inform the integration of social media intelligence into malaria programs and policy.MethodologyA scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR using a predefined search and screening framework. Studies were eligible if they examined the use or evaluation of social media platforms or social media-derived data. Records were screened for eligibility, and data were charted according to study characteristics, geographical setting, platform, social media function, malaria application, and demonstrated public health action level. Findings were synthesized descriptively and mapped along an engagement-to-action pathway.ResultsThirty studies published between 2016 and 2026 were included. Eighteen originated from African settings, eight were global/international, three were from China, and one was from India. Twitter/X and Facebook were the most frequently represented platforms. Health education and behavior-change communication was the most common primary social-media role (33.3%), while misinformation and risk communication accounted for 23.3%. At the highest demonstrated public-health action level, 10 studies reported reach, engagement, or knowledge outcomes; 12 generated public-health intelligence; and two reported malaria-related health outcomes.ConclusionSocial media has evolved from disseminating malaria information to supporting social listening and program response, but a substantial engagement-to-action gap remains, with limited evidence linking social media activities to malaria-related health outcomes. Therefore, social media should be integrated as a complementary component of surveillance rather than considered a stand-alone elimination intervention.
Related
- Mass vaccination and drug administration for malaria elimination in Bangladesh: design and implementation of a community engagement strategy.
- Epidemiology and social factors of malaria in the Yanomami Indigenous Territory: a critical review of the challenges of control and elimination.
- Older adults' engagement with social prescribing to active ageing centres in Singapore: a qualitative study from public primary care.
- Malaria-Driven Susceptibility to Invasive Non-Typhoidal Salmonella: A Co-infection Study with Implications for Elimination
- Health system readiness-the neglected catalyst in Malaria elimination.
BibTeX
@article{zheng2026from,
title = {{From social media engagement to public health action: the role of social media in sustainable malaria elimination}},
author = {Xun Zheng and Gelin Huang},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1987769},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1987769},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - From social media engagement to public health action: the role of social media in sustainable malaria elimination
AU - Xun Zheng
AU - Gelin Huang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1987769
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1987769
AB - BackgroundMalaria remains a major global public health challenge, for which conventional malaria prevention and elimination depend on malaria-related knowledge, perceptions, behaviors, and public responses, but in reality, they require integrated surveillance, community engagement, behavioral change, and the rapid translation of evidence into context-specific public health action. Social media has emerged as an important module involving communities in intervention design and implementation, but evidence remains fragmented across measurable malaria outcomes and analytics.ObjectiveTo map and synthesize the available evidence using social media for the malaria elimination continuum, limitations, and gaps, and to inform the integration of social media intelligence into malaria programs and policy.MethodologyA scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR using a predefined search and screening framework. Studies were eligible if they examined the use or evaluation of social media platforms or social media-derived data. Records were screened for eligibility, and data were charted according to study characteristics, geographical setting, platform, social media function, malaria application, and demonstrated public health action level. Findings were synthesized descriptively and mapped along an engagement-to-action pathway.ResultsThirty studies published between 2016 and 2026 were included. Eighteen originated from African settings, eight were global/international, three were from China, and one was from India. Twitter/X and Facebook were the most frequently represented platforms. Health education and behavior-change communication was the most common primary social-media role (33.3%), while misinformation and risk communication accounted for 23.3%. At the highest demonstrated public-health action level, 10 studies reported reach, engagement, or knowledge outcomes; 12 generated public-health intelligence; and two reported malaria-related health outcomes.ConclusionSocial media has evolved from disseminating malaria information to supporting social listening and program response, but a substantial engagement-to-action gap remains, with limited evidence linking social media activities to malaria-related health outcomes. Therefore, social media should be integrated as a complementary component of surveillance rather than considered a stand-alone elimination intervention.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -