Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Impact of park renovation on children’s physical activity in New York City

Abstract

Background: Parks are an important built environment element for children’s physical activity (PA), but evidence on whether park renovations lead to measurable changes in children’s PA remains mixed. Using a quasi-experimental design with demographically matched controls, we examined whether park redesign and renovation through New York City’s Community Parks Initiative (CPI) was associated with changes in PA and sedentary behavior among children living in low-income neighborhoods.

Methods: Data were drawn from the Physical Activity and Redesigned Community Spaces (PARCS) Study from 2017 to 2021. Children aged 3-8 living within 0.3 miles of 21 parks (10 intervention, 11 control) were recruited and wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days pre- and post-renovation. Participants were included if had at least 3 valid days (≥8 hrs) of wear. Primary outcomes were average counts and vector magnitude per minute (CPM, VMPM); secondary outcomes were daily minutes of sedentary behavior, light, moderate, and vigorous PA, and step counts, classified using Evenson cut points. Linear mixed models were used to compare changes between intervention and control over time.

Results: A total of 76 children had valid data at both time points, with a mean baseline age of 5.92 years (SD = 1.72). After adjusting for age, follow-up time, and month of data collection, there were no statistically significant changes in CPM (DID=-54.02, SE = 60.92, p = 0.38), VMPM (DID=-64.68, SE = 102.86, p = 0.53), or any secondary outcome in between intervention and control groups. There was an overall decrease in VMPM and light PA over time (p < 0.05), consistent with age-related decline in PA among children.

Conclusions: Park renovation through CPI was not associated with increases in children’s PA. Improving park infrastructure may be necessary, but not sufficient, to shift children’s activity levels. Additional interventions, such as park-based programming, may be needed to produce measurable changes in child PA.

Key messages: • Park redesign and renovation alone may not be enough to increase children’s physical activity without accompanying programs or activities.

• Physical activity generally declined over the study period, consistent with expected age-related maturational changes in activity among children.

Related

  1. Park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods and changes in adult physical activity and sedentary behavior: a quasi-experimental study.
    Rachel L Thompson, Kelly R Evenson, Katarzyna E Wyka +4
    The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMCPMC
  2. Boosting Children’s Physical Activity in Outside School Hours Care
    Amanda E. Staiano
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  3. Low-grade systemic inflammation in overweight children: impact of physical fitness
    Martin Halle, U. Korsten-Reck, Bernd Wolfarth +1
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated88 citedEndocrinology & metabolismEpidemiology & public healthOpenAlex
  4. Physical activity, entertainment screen time, and dietary fat profiles and concurrent weight status among school-attending Chinese children and adolescents: CHNS 2004–2011
    Boao Qin, Changyang Wang, Yuchen Zhang +4
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Effects of physical activity on executive function components and academic performance in children aged 6–12 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pingxue Qiu, Ting Zhou, Jiachen Wu +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{hong2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of park renovation on children’s physical activity in New York City}},
  author = {H Hong and RL Thompson and KE Wyka and T Rouyard and KR Evenson and LE Thorpe and TTK Huang},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1278},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1278},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of park renovation on children’s physical activity in New York City
AU  - H Hong
AU  - RL Thompson
AU  - KE Wyka
AU  - T Rouyard
AU  - KR Evenson
AU  - LE Thorpe
AU  - TTK Huang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1278
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1278
AB  - Background: Parks are an important built environment element for children’s physical activity (PA), but evidence on whether park renovations lead to measurable changes in children’s PA remains mixed. Using a quasi-experimental design with demographically matched controls, we examined whether park redesign and renovation through New York City’s Community Parks Initiative (CPI) was associated with changes in PA and sedentary behavior among children living in low-income neighborhoods.  Methods: Data were drawn from the Physical Activity and Redesigned Community Spaces (PARCS) Study from 2017 to 2021. Children aged 3-8 living within 0.3 miles of 21 parks (10 intervention, 11 control) were recruited and wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days pre- and post-renovation. Participants were included if had at least 3 valid days (≥8 hrs) of wear. Primary outcomes were average counts and vector magnitude per minute (CPM, VMPM); secondary outcomes were daily minutes of sedentary behavior, light, moderate, and vigorous PA, and step counts, classified using Evenson cut points. Linear mixed models were used to compare changes between intervention and control over time.  Results: A total of 76 children had valid data at both time points, with a mean baseline age of 5.92 years (SD = 1.72). After adjusting for age, follow-up time, and month of data collection, there were no statistically significant changes in CPM (DID=-54.02, SE = 60.92, p = 0.38), VMPM (DID=-64.68, SE = 102.86, p = 0.53), or any secondary outcome in between intervention and control groups. There was an overall decrease in VMPM and light PA over time (p < 0.05), consistent with age-related decline in PA among children.  Conclusions: Park renovation through CPI was not associated with increases in children’s PA. Improving park infrastructure may be necessary, but not sufficient, to shift children’s activity levels. Additional interventions, such as park-based programming, may be needed to produce measurable changes in child PA.  Key messages: • Park redesign and renovation alone may not be enough to increase children’s physical activity without accompanying programs or activities.  • Physical activity generally declined over the study period, consistent with expected age-related maturational changes in activity among children.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -