Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,043 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

Postoperative Emergence After Remimazolam- Versus Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study

  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan

Abstract

Context:: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used for general anesthesia, including cardiac surgery; however, its effect on postoperative emergence following cardiopulmonary bypass remains unclear.

Aims:: We aimed to compare postoperative emergence following remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

Settings and Design:: A retrospective observational study.

Methods and Materials:: We included adult patients who underwent elective cardiac valve replacement surgery at a single center between April 2023 and September 2024. Patients received either remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia according to institutional practice. The primary endpoint was postoperative emergence time. Secondary endpoints included time to extubation and early postoperative hemodynamic stability assessed using the vasoactive–inotropic score.

Statistical Analysis Used:: Baseline characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed.

Results:: Sixty-three patients were included in the analysis (remimazolam group, n = 21; propofol group, n = 42). Postoperative emergence time did not differ significantly between the two groups (164 [120–253] min vs. 137 [95–188] min, P = 0.193). Time to extubation was also comparable between the groups (1,009 [914–1,070] min vs. 1,033 [906–1,057] min, P = 0.844). Early postoperative hemodynamic parameters, including vasoactive–inotropic scores, were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions:: In adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery, postoperative emergence time was comparable between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. More prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of remimazolam in cardiac anesthesia.

Related

  1. Remimazolam-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery in an Infant With a Pathogenic RYR1 Variant
    Lily Lindemann, Peter Winch, Brittany L. Willer +1
    Journal of medical casesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparison of remimazolam total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia on emergence agitation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gastric or colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Wenjie Mao, Binbin Yang, Fan Huang +3
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  3. Hemodynamic Outcomes and Vasopressor Requirements with Remimazolam-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Propofol-Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Robot-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Ji Young Kim, Na Young Kim, Hyun Joo Kim +6
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Effects of isobaric spinal anesthesia combined with different nerve block techniques on postoperative pain and complications in elderly patients undergoing proximal femoral nail antirotation: a retrospective observational study
    Jingjing Li, Ning Ma, Yuan Zhao +2
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
  5. Intravenous Fat Emulsion Administration and Short-Term Lipid Profiles Under a Standardized Clinical Pathway After Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Kazuo Kobayashi, Satoshi Ida, Masanari Tsuji +7
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
BibTeX
@article{fujii2026postoperative,
  title = {{Postoperative Emergence After Remimazolam- Versus Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study}},
  author = {Emi Fujii and Yasuhiko Imashuku and Motoi Inoue and Hirotoshi Kitagawa},
  journal = {Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.4103/aca.aca_90_26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_90_26},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Postoperative Emergence After Remimazolam- Versus Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study
AU  - Emi Fujii
AU  - Yasuhiko Imashuku
AU  - Motoi Inoue
AU  - Hirotoshi Kitagawa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
DO  - 10.4103/aca.aca_90_26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_90_26
AB  - Context:: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used for general anesthesia, including cardiac surgery; however, its effect on postoperative emergence following cardiopulmonary bypass remains unclear.  Aims:: We aimed to compare postoperative emergence following remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.  Settings and Design:: A retrospective observational study.  Methods and Materials:: We included adult patients who underwent elective cardiac valve replacement surgery at a single center between April 2023 and September 2024. Patients received either remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia according to institutional practice. The primary endpoint was postoperative emergence time. Secondary endpoints included time to extubation and early postoperative hemodynamic stability assessed using the vasoactive–inotropic score.  Statistical Analysis Used:: Baseline characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed.  Results:: Sixty-three patients were included in the analysis (remimazolam group, n = 21; propofol group, n = 42). Postoperative emergence time did not differ significantly between the two groups (164 [120–253] min vs. 137 [95–188] min, P = 0.193). Time to extubation was also comparable between the groups (1,009 [914–1,070] min vs. 1,033 [906–1,057] min, P = 0.844). Early postoperative hemodynamic parameters, including vasoactive–inotropic scores, were comparable between the two groups.  Conclusions:: In adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery, postoperative emergence time was comparable between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. More prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of remimazolam in cardiac anesthesia.
SN  - 0971-9784
SN  - 0974-5181
ER  -