Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BYHAL

Assessment of tomography-derived three-dimensional cloud information and its suitability for downstream applications

Abstract

Meteorological geostationary satellites carry passive imagers that provide multispectral observations over a large fraction of the Earth disk every 5–15 min. Cloud properties retrieved from these observations are primarily two-dimensional, as they are inferred from top-of-atmosphere radiances, and contain only limited information on vertical cloud structure. Recent SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography studies have shown that it is possible to infer CloudSat-like three-dimensional cloud structure from multispectral passive imagery. The main open question is therefore no longer feasibility of such approach, but the reliability of the reconstructed cloud information for downstream applications. The present study addresses this gap through a systematic performance evaluation of a SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography method on an independent year-long (2019) dataset of 17,110 scenes. The analysis assesses the fidelity of the estimated reflectivity, but also evaluates cloud occurrence, cloud geometry, vertically aggregated summaries derived from the 3D information, and their dependence on different variables. Scene-wise reflectivity RMSE over all CloudSat-valid voxels, including cloudy and clear-sky voxels is consistent with previous studies (2.76 dBZ). However, evaluation restricted to radar-detectable cloudy voxels yields a much larger median RMSE (14.48 dBZ) and bias (-11.16 dBZ), indicating systematic attenuation of moderate and strong echoes. Cloudy-voxel fraction is only weakly biased (-2.0 %), whereas cloudy-column fraction is underestimated by -17.4 %, consistent with missed observed-cloudy columns (POD = 0.63) and few false detections (FAR = 0.031). Cloud top and base heights remain informative when evaluated only where cloud geometry is defined in both observation and prediction (about 60 % of observed-cloudy columns) with median errors of 1.38 and 1.41 km. The scene-level vertical cloud centroid provides a complementary aggregate summary, with 96 % cloudy-scene recall, r = 0.89, and an RMSE of 1.04 km, while 97.4 % of observed multilayer columns collapse to single-layer reconstructions. The results show that SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography is limited in resolving fine-scale vertical structure and multilayer organization, but remains informative for bulk descriptors such as cloud fraction, vertical cloud centroid, and cloud top and base heights.

Related

  1. A comprehensive suitability assessment framework for low impact development (LID) incorporating life-cycle carbon benefits: A case study in Wuhan, China
    Siqi Gong, Jun Zhang, Xiangqian Xiao +3
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional StudiesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. Hydrogeochemical characteristics, controlling processes, and irrigation suitability assessment of groundwater in the Sanjiang Plain, China
    Lingbo Wang, Xin Liu, Panpan Xu +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  3. From Hazard to Resource: A Screening‐Level Assessment of Glacial Lake Hydropower Potential and Development Suitability in the Poiqu River Basin, Central Himalaya
    Jiyao Zhu, Guoxiong Zheng, Guoqing Zhang +9
    Water Resources ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyDOAJ
  4. Seasonal Aridity Characterisation and AHP-Weighted Multi-Criteria Land Suitability Assessment for Cotton in a Semi-Arid Taluka of Saurashtra, Gujarat, India
    Hardeep Kumar, N. K. Gontia, Pritam Das +1
    Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Dynamic life cycle assessment in environmental assessment of processes and products: A scoping review of sectoral applications, digitalization, decision support, and policy relevance
    Ana Arias, Gumersindo Feijoo, Marı́a Teresa Moreira
    Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND6 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{boccalatte2026assessment,
  title = {{Assessment of tomography-derived three-dimensional cloud information and its suitability for downstream applications}},
  author = {Alessia Boccalatte and Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan and Benoît Gschwind and Gabriel Chesnoiu},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.5194/egusphere-2026-4441},
  url = {https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-05750681v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Assessment of tomography-derived three-dimensional cloud information and its suitability for downstream applications
AU  - Alessia Boccalatte
AU  - Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan
AU  - Benoît Gschwind
AU  - Gabriel Chesnoiu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/28
PB  - HAL
DO  - 10.5194/egusphere-2026-4441
UR  - https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-05750681v1
AB  - Meteorological geostationary satellites carry passive imagers that provide multispectral observations over a large fraction of the Earth disk every 5–15 min. Cloud properties retrieved from these observations are primarily two-dimensional, as they are inferred from top-of-atmosphere radiances, and contain only limited information on vertical cloud structure. Recent SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography studies have shown that it is possible to infer CloudSat-like three-dimensional cloud structure from multispectral passive imagery. The main open question is therefore no longer feasibility of such approach, but the reliability of the reconstructed cloud information for downstream applications. The present study addresses this gap through a systematic performance evaluation of a SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography method on an independent year-long (2019) dataset of 17,110 scenes. The analysis assesses the fidelity of the estimated reflectivity, but also evaluates cloud occurrence, cloud geometry, vertically aggregated summaries derived from the 3D information, and their dependence on different variables. Scene-wise reflectivity RMSE over all CloudSat-valid voxels, including cloudy and clear-sky voxels is consistent with previous studies (2.76 dBZ). However, evaluation restricted to radar-detectable cloudy voxels yields a much larger median RMSE (14.48 dBZ) and bias (-11.16 dBZ), indicating systematic attenuation of moderate and strong echoes. Cloudy-voxel fraction is only weakly biased (-2.0 %), whereas cloudy-column fraction is underestimated by -17.4 %, consistent with missed observed-cloudy columns (POD = 0.63) and few false detections (FAR = 0.031). Cloud top and base heights remain informative when evaluated only where cloud geometry is defined in both observation and prediction (about 60 % of observed-cloudy columns) with median errors of 1.38 and 1.41 km. The scene-level vertical cloud centroid provides a complementary aggregate summary, with 96 % cloudy-scene recall, r = 0.89, and an RMSE of 1.04 km, while 97.4 % of observed multilayer columns collapse to single-layer reconstructions. The results show that SEVIRI-CloudSat tomography is limited in resolving fine-scale vertical structure and multilayer organization, but remains informative for bulk descriptors such as cloud fraction, vertical cloud centroid, and cloud top and base heights.
ER  -