Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Differences in anti-amyloid therapy eligibility assessment based on use of the SWI versus GRE sequence.

1 more authors
4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
  2. 2Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
  3. 3Department of Neurosurgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
  4. 4Department of Quantitative Health Science Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.

Abstract

Introduction

The number of microhemorrhages (mHs) increases risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) in those undergoing anti-amyloid treatments for Alzheimer's disease. It is unclear whether using different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to detect mH would alter treatment decisions.Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 55 adults (mean age 72.1 ± 7.1 years) evaluated for cognitive concerns who had MRI exams including both susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and gradient echo (GRE) sequences. Three neuroradiologists independently identified and then reached consensus on mH detection. Participants were classified into mH burden categories (none, 1, 2-4, ≥ 5).Results

Readers identified 83 mHs (mean 1.51) on SWI versus 54 (mean 0.98) on GRE. Burden categories agreed in 34 (61.8%) participants, was higher on SWI in 17 (30.9%) participants, and higher on GRE in 4 (7.3%) participants.Conclusions

Readers on average identified more mHs on SWI than GRE, altering risk categories. Prospective studies are needed to establish SWI-based safety thresholds for anti-amyloid therapies.

Related

  1. Real-World Patient Eligibility for Alzheimer's Disease Anti-Amyloid Therapy in Seven Swedish Memory Clinics.
    Anna Rosenberg, Anna Rennie, Urban Ekman +7
    European journal of neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  2. Is Eligibility Enough? Pretreatment Prediction of Failure to Reach a Second Cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy
    Halim Özçevik, Enes Mustafa Kaya, Burcu Esen Akkaş +6
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Dosimetry-guided morphomic modeling using daily FBCT for automated all-in-one radiotherapy eligibility assessment in postoperative cervical cancer
    Yueliang Xu, Hao Chen, Xiaoting Xu +3
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyFrontiersCrossref
  4. Development and Pilot Assessment of an AI-Generated Digital Donor Eligibility Screening Tool in Saudi Blood Banks: A Quality Improvement Study
    Eman M. Mansory, Maha A. Badawi
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  5. Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy for Existential Distress in Serious and Life-Limiting Illness: Emerging Trial Evidence, Barriers to Access, and the Case for Individualized Eligibility
    Janis Ancans
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@article{bermudez2026differences,
  title = {{Differences in anti-amyloid therapy eligibility assessment based on use of the SWI versus GRE sequence.}},
  author = {Camilo Bermudez and Jay J Pillai and Brian J Burkett and Jennifer S McDonald and Derek R Johnson and Heather J Wiste and Stephen D Weigand and Clifford R Jack and Prashanthi Vemuri and Ronald C Petersen and Jonathan Graff-Radford and Vijay K Ramanan and Petrice M Cogswell},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/dad2.70524},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42959393},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Differences in anti-amyloid therapy eligibility assessment based on use of the SWI versus GRE sequence.
AU  - Camilo Bermudez
AU  - Jay J Pillai
AU  - Brian J Burkett
AU  - Jennifer S McDonald
AU  - Derek R Johnson
AU  - Heather J Wiste
AU  - Stephen D Weigand
AU  - Clifford R Jack
AU  - Prashanthi Vemuri
AU  - Ronald C Petersen
AU  - Jonathan Graff-Radford
AU  - Vijay K Ramanan
AU  - Petrice M Cogswell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
DO  - 10.1002/dad2.70524
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42959393
AB  - Introduction  The number of microhemorrhages (mHs) increases risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) in those undergoing anti-amyloid treatments for Alzheimer's disease. It is unclear whether using different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to detect mH would alter treatment decisions.Methods  We retrospectively analyzed 55 adults (mean age 72.1 ± 7.1 years) evaluated for cognitive concerns who had MRI exams including both susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and gradient echo (GRE) sequences. Three neuroradiologists independently identified and then reached consensus on mH detection. Participants were classified into mH burden categories (none, 1, 2-4, ≥ 5).Results  Readers identified 83 mHs (mean 1.51) on SWI versus 54 (mean 0.98) on GRE. Burden categories agreed in 34 (61.8%) participants, was higher on SWI in 17 (30.9%) participants, and higher on GRE in 4 (7.3%) participants.Conclusions  Readers on average identified more mHs on SWI than GRE, altering risk categories. Prospective studies are needed to establish SWI-based safety thresholds for anti-amyloid therapies.
SN  - 2352-8729
ER  -