Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,788 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

SALGINTR: Digital Participatory ILI Surveillance System Among Physicians in Türkiye-Proof of Concept

Abstract

Background: Participatory surveillance complements sentinel influenza monitoring in high-income settings, yet no platform has targeted physicians as both participants and clinical sentinels. We established SALGINTR, a digital, physician-driven participatory surveillance system for influenza-like illness (ILI), built from free cloud tools for ∼US $100.

Methods: Physicians across Türkiye were recruited via snowball sampling to submit weekly ILI self-reports online (https://www.salgin.com.tr) during epidemiological weeks 40–52 of the 2025–26 season. The ECDC ILI case definition was applied, and independent episodes were ascertained by a clinical-episode rule (consecutive symptomatic weeks attributed to the same agent counted as one). Concordance with national ERVISS sentinel surveillance was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlations, cross-correlation, and Bland–Altman agreement. Detection used seven aberration algorithms (EARS C1–C3, CUSUM, EWMA, Farrington, Percentile).

Results: Of 243 registered physicians, 197 (analytical cohort) contributed 1,484 respondent-weeks. Cumulative ILI incidence was 50.8%, with 156 independent episodes from 190 symptomatic person-weeks. Weekly viral-systemic positivity showed dynamics concordant with sentinel surveillance after smoothing (raw Pearson r = 0.492, p = 0.088; 3W-MA r = 0.736, p = 0.010; Spearman ρ = 0.809, p = 0.003). Bland–Altman indicated no significant systematic bias (mean difference +4.6 pp; 95% LoA −18.3 to + 27.4). Both systems peaked in multi-algorithm consensus at the epidemic peak (W52); first-alarm timing showed no consistent lead (≈0 weeks).

Conclusions: SALGINTR shows that a physician-driven digital participatory surveillance system can generate ILI signals concordant with established sentinel surveillance at minimal cost. This proof-of-concept supports participatory surveillance as a complementary component of mosaic respiratory disease surveillance in middle-income settings.

Key messages: • A physician-driven digital participatory surveillance system can generate ILI signals concordant with sentinel surveillance at under $100 infrastructure cost.

• Signal timing showed no lead or lag versus sentinel surveillance; but as SALGINTR reports in real time while official data lag 2–4 weeks, it operationally delivers earlier epidemic warning in practice

Related

  1. Medico-legal Knowledge and Awareness Among Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Physicians in Türkiye: A Nationwide Survey.
    Hacı Yusuf Güneş
    Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Gripenet 2025/26: re-establishing participatory surveillance in Portugal
    V Gómez, AL Saraiva, AP Rodrigues
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  3. Assessing dengue knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices in France and Italy: A cross-sectional study using participatory surveillance cohorts
    Lucille Calmon, Alessandro De Gaetano, Mattia Mazzoli +8
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
  4. Enrollment in participatory surveillance programs and influenza vaccination uptake: A systematic review protocol
    Oluchi Joan Kanma-Okafor, Priyanka Ravi, Maiya G. Block Ngaybe +7
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Epidemiological surveillance of bacterial pathogens in cultured European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) along the Aegean coast of Türkiye
    Pınar Çelik, Vyron Georgalas, İhsan Çelik
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0EcologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
BibTeX
@article{ontas2026salgintr,
  title = {{SALGINTR: Digital Participatory ILI Surveillance System Among Physicians in Türkiye-Proof of Concept}},
  author = {E Öntaş and H Guclu and Y Aydin Son},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1641},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1641},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - SALGINTR: Digital Participatory ILI Surveillance System Among Physicians in Türkiye-Proof of Concept
AU  - E Öntaş
AU  - H Guclu
AU  - Y Aydin Son
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1641
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1641
AB  - Background: Participatory surveillance complements sentinel influenza monitoring in high-income settings, yet no platform has targeted physicians as both participants and clinical sentinels. We established SALGINTR, a digital, physician-driven participatory surveillance system for influenza-like illness (ILI), built from free cloud tools for ∼US $100.  Methods: Physicians across Türkiye were recruited via snowball sampling to submit weekly ILI self-reports online (https://www.salgin.com.tr) during epidemiological weeks 40–52 of the 2025–26 season. The ECDC ILI case definition was applied, and independent episodes were ascertained by a clinical-episode rule (consecutive symptomatic weeks attributed to the same agent counted as one). Concordance with national ERVISS sentinel surveillance was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlations, cross-correlation, and Bland–Altman agreement. Detection used seven aberration algorithms (EARS C1–C3, CUSUM, EWMA, Farrington, Percentile).  Results: Of 243 registered physicians, 197 (analytical cohort) contributed 1,484 respondent-weeks. Cumulative ILI incidence was 50.8%, with 156 independent episodes from 190 symptomatic person-weeks. Weekly viral-systemic positivity showed dynamics concordant with sentinel surveillance after smoothing (raw Pearson r = 0.492, p = 0.088; 3W-MA r = 0.736, p = 0.010; Spearman ρ = 0.809, p = 0.003). Bland–Altman indicated no significant systematic bias (mean difference +4.6 pp; 95% LoA −18.3 to + 27.4). Both systems peaked in multi-algorithm consensus at the epidemic peak (W52); first-alarm timing showed no consistent lead (≈0 weeks).  Conclusions: SALGINTR shows that a physician-driven digital participatory surveillance system can generate ILI signals concordant with established sentinel surveillance at minimal cost. This proof-of-concept supports participatory surveillance as a complementary component of mosaic respiratory disease surveillance in middle-income settings.  Key messages: • A physician-driven digital participatory surveillance system can generate ILI signals concordant with sentinel surveillance at under $100 infrastructure cost.  • Signal timing showed no lead or lag versus sentinel surveillance; but as SALGINTR reports in real time while official data lag 2–4 weeks, it operationally delivers earlier epidemic warning in practice
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -