Outstrumental Variable Regression
Abstract
Estimating the causal effect of a treatment X on an outcome Y from observational data in the presence of unobserved confounding requires additional structure or assumptions. Existing identification strategies such as instrumental variable regression exploit exogenous variation in only the treatment. We show that the causal effect can also be identified if the outcome mechanism varies across a finite set of environments, even if the treatment distribution is unchanged. Concretely, we introduce Outstrumental Variable Regression (OVR), which proceeds in three steps: (i) compute the conditional expectation of Y given X in each environment; (ii) form the vector of differences in these conditional expectations between all environments and a reference environment (we call this vector contrast); and (iii) regress Y on X while adjusting for the contrast and environment. We prove that this yields the true causal effect if the following two conditions hold: inclusion restriction, i.e., the contrast determines the conditional confounding bias; and positivity, i.e., the treatment varies sufficiently strongly after adjustment. We prove that a finite-sample version of OVR is consistent under regularity conditions and demonstrate the procedure's effectiveness on synthetic and real-world data.
Related
- Observation-Specific Uncertainty Modeling for Latent-Variable Regression in High-Dimensional Analytical Data
- FDR-Controlled Variable Selection for Generalized Linear Models and Cox Regression with Virtual Dummies
- BGM-IV: AI-Powered Bayesian Generative Modeling for Instrumental Variable Regression with High-Dimensional Covariates
- Sparsity by Default: The Theory and Practice of ARD in Gaussian Process Regression for Variable Selection
- SelectPFN: Amortized Bayesian Variable Selection for Sparse Nonlinear Regression with Prior-Data Fitted Networks
BibTeX
@misc{schur2026outstrumental,
title = {{Outstrumental Variable Regression}},
author = {Felix Schur and Linus Kühne and Julius von Kügelgen and Jonas Peters},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.00266},
eprint = {2611.00266},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00266},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Outstrumental Variable Regression
AU - Felix Schur
AU - Linus Kühne
AU - Julius von Kügelgen
AU - Jonas Peters
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.00266
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00266
AB - Estimating the causal effect of a treatment X on an outcome Y from observational data in the presence of unobserved confounding requires additional structure or assumptions. Existing identification strategies such as instrumental variable regression exploit exogenous variation in only the treatment. We show that the causal effect can also be identified if the outcome mechanism varies across a finite set of environments, even if the treatment distribution is unchanged. Concretely, we introduce Outstrumental Variable Regression (OVR), which proceeds in three steps: (i) compute the conditional expectation of Y given X in each environment; (ii) form the vector of differences in these conditional expectations between all environments and a reference environment (we call this vector contrast); and (iii) regress Y on X while adjusting for the contrast and environment. We prove that this yields the true causal effect if the following two conditions hold: inclusion restriction, i.e., the contrast determines the conditional confounding bias; and positivity, i.e., the treatment varies sufficiently strongly after adjustment. We prove that a finite-sample version of OVR is consistent under regularity conditions and demonstrate the procedure's effectiveness on synthetic and real-world data.
ER -