Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sample Complexity for Generative Learning of Quantum Measurement Data

Abstract

Generative learning of a quantum measurement distribution from finite data requires choosing a model capacity that balances representation accuracy against estimation cost. We develop a bias-variance framework that decomposes the expected population Kullback-Leibler error at model capacity s and sample size N as ℰ(s,N)=B(s)+V(s,N), with representation bias B and a variance term V capturing the mean estimation error. In the well-sampled regime, V(s,N)≃[NC(s)]−1, and exponential or algebraic laws for B and C yield four scaling templates for the optimal error, from inverse powers of N to inverse powers of ln N. For local autoregressive models, the context radius sets the model capacity, and B is the summed conditional mutual information lost by truncating the context. For a smoothed histogram learner, we derive an exact finite-sample estimation cost that accounts for rarely observed contexts and recovers the parameter-count law in the well-sampled regime. For transverse-field Ising Born distributions, the independently evaluated bias and estimation cost predict both the optimal context radius and the optimal error. In the well-sampled regime, the estimation cost grows exponentially with context radius. Its competition with approximately exponential bias decay in the gapped regimes predicts power-law error decay in N, while algebraic bias decay at criticality predicts asymptotic inverse-power decay in ln N. Bulk-site results are consistent with the corresponding finite-sample predictions. These results connect the structure of quantum measurement distributions to the model capacity justified by finite data.

Related

  1. Nearly Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Fourier-Sparse Boolean Functions
    Zekun Ye
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Machine learning for sample-based quantum diagonalization: a review of generative configuration recovery and the classical-simulability frontier
    Nicolás Bonilla Vargas
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries
    Natsuto Isogai, Satoshi Yoshida, Mio Murao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. An Exponential Sample-Complexity Advantage for Coherent Quantum Inference
    Zhaoyi Li, Elias Theil, Aram W. Harrow +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. PTED: A multi-dimensional two-sample test for scientific inference and generative machine learning
    Connor Stone
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026sample,
  title = {{Sample Complexity for Generative Learning of Quantum Measurement Data}},
  author = {Shuhan Zhang and Yi-Zhuang You},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.38028},
  eprint = {2610.38028},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38028},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sample Complexity for Generative Learning of Quantum Measurement Data
AU  - Shuhan Zhang
AU  - Yi-Zhuang You
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.38028
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38028
AB  - Generative learning of a quantum measurement distribution from finite data requires choosing a model capacity that balances representation accuracy against estimation cost. We develop a bias-variance framework that decomposes the expected population Kullback-Leibler error at model capacity s and sample size N as ℰ(s,N)=B(s)+V(s,N), with representation bias B and a variance term V capturing the mean estimation error. In the well-sampled regime, V(s,N)≃[NC(s)]^−1, and exponential or algebraic laws for B and C yield four scaling templates for the optimal error, from inverse powers of N to inverse powers of ln N. For local autoregressive models, the context radius sets the model capacity, and B is the summed conditional mutual information lost by truncating the context. For a smoothed histogram learner, we derive an exact finite-sample estimation cost that accounts for rarely observed contexts and recovers the parameter-count law in the well-sampled regime. For transverse-field Ising Born distributions, the independently evaluated bias and estimation cost predict both the optimal context radius and the optimal error. In the well-sampled regime, the estimation cost grows exponentially with context radius. Its competition with approximately exponential bias decay in the gapped regimes predicts power-law error decay in N, while algebraic bias decay at criticality predicts asymptotic inverse-power decay in ln N. Bulk-site results are consistent with the corresponding finite-sample predictions. These results connect the structure of quantum measurement distributions to the model capacity justified by finite data.
ER  -