Quantitative Shape Analysis Supports the Use of Aortic Arch Stent Grafts in Complex Aortic Geometries
- 1University of Chicago
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) relies on distal landing zones beyond the left common carotid artery, which may underperform in patients with complex aortic anatomy. The Nexus Aortic Arch Stent Graft enables proximal landing zones in the ascending aorta, expanding endovascular options for challenging arch pathology. This study applies a geometrically focused framework using fluctuation in total integrated Gaussian curvature (), a size-invariant metric of surface topology, to evaluate Nexus performance across diverse aortic morphologies. Methods: Pre-operative CT imaging was analyzed for 27 patients treated with the Nexus device and 37 treated with traditional TEVAR (proximal landing zones 2/3). CT scans from 215 patients with non-pathologic aortas served as controls. Two-dimensional aortic surface meshes were constructed to calculate and mean aortic radius, while tortuosity index was derived from the centerline. Nexus data were mapped into a previously established size-shape feature space to assess predicted outcomes. TEVAR failure was defined as reintervention or death due to aneurysmal growth, endoleak, dissection extension, or rupture. Correlation and clustering analyses evaluated relationships between aortic morphology and outcomes. A scale-sampling approach captured the multiscale nature of aortic geometry while reducing sensitivity to mesh resolution and partitioning. Results: The Traditional TEVAR cohort had a significantly lower success rate than the Nexus cohort (51.4% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.005). Traditional TEVAR was particularly less effective in patients with elevated and large mean radius, whereas the Nexus device demonstrated favorable outcomes even in anatomically complex aortas with similarly elevated and radius values. Combining and radius demonstrated distinct clustering patterns by pathology: 78.3% of chronic dissections occupied the high /radius zone, while 70.6% of isolated aneurysms fell in the low /radius zone (p < 0.001). provided unique morphological insight beyond size, whereas tortuosity index was less discriminative. Conclusion: offers a quantitative framework for assessing device performance across variable aortic anatomy. Endovascular arch repair using proximal ascending aortic landing zones, exemplified by the Nexus device, may provide a viable option in patients with complex geometry. This shape-size framework represents a step toward personalized patient selection and improved long-term outcomes.
Related
- Feasibility and Procedural Considerations of Balloon‐Expandable TAVR in Patients With Prior Endovascular Aortic Stent Grafts
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Complex Anatomy: An Anatomy-Driven Framework for Bicuspid Stenosis, Pure Aortic Regurgitation, and the Small Annulus in the Era of Lifetime Management
- Surgical explantation following early transcatheter aortic valve failure: Technical considerations for complex situations.
- Surgical thrombectomy with preservation of the bioprosthetic aortic valve in obstructive valve thrombosis during complex redo cardiac surgery
- Complex decision-making in severe bicuspid aortic stenosis after multiple thoracic interventions
BibTeX
@misc{twohig2026quantitative,
title = {{Quantitative Shape Analysis Supports the Use of Aortic Arch Stent Grafts in Complex Aortic Geometries}},
author = {K. C. Twohig and J. A. Pugar and I. McDougall and C. J. Lee and R. Milner and L. Pocivavsek},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.25.26365919},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.25.26365919v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Quantitative Shape Analysis Supports the Use of Aortic Arch Stent Grafts in Complex Aortic Geometries
AU - K. C. Twohig
AU - J. A. Pugar
AU - I. McDougall
AU - C. J. Lee
AU - R. Milner
AU - L. Pocivavsek
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.25.26365919
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.25.26365919v1
AB - Introduction: Traditional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) relies on distal landing zones beyond the left common carotid artery, which may underperform in patients with complex aortic anatomy. The Nexus Aortic Arch Stent Graft enables proximal landing zones in the ascending aorta, expanding endovascular options for challenging arch pathology. This study applies a geometrically focused framework using fluctuation in total integrated Gaussian curvature (), a size-invariant metric of surface topology, to evaluate Nexus performance across diverse aortic morphologies. Methods: Pre-operative CT imaging was analyzed for 27 patients treated with the Nexus device and 37 treated with traditional TEVAR (proximal landing zones 2/3). CT scans from 215 patients with non-pathologic aortas served as controls. Two-dimensional aortic surface meshes were constructed to calculate and mean aortic radius, while tortuosity index was derived from the centerline. Nexus data were mapped into a previously established size-shape feature space to assess predicted outcomes. TEVAR failure was defined as reintervention or death due to aneurysmal growth, endoleak, dissection extension, or rupture. Correlation and clustering analyses evaluated relationships between aortic morphology and outcomes. A scale-sampling approach captured the multiscale nature of aortic geometry while reducing sensitivity to mesh resolution and partitioning. Results: The Traditional TEVAR cohort had a significantly lower success rate than the Nexus cohort (51.4% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.005). Traditional TEVAR was particularly less effective in patients with elevated and large mean radius, whereas the Nexus device demonstrated favorable outcomes even in anatomically complex aortas with similarly elevated and radius values. Combining and radius demonstrated distinct clustering patterns by pathology: 78.3% of chronic dissections occupied the high /radius zone, while 70.6% of isolated aneurysms fell in the low /radius zone (p < 0.001). provided unique morphological insight beyond size, whereas tortuosity index was less discriminative. Conclusion: offers a quantitative framework for assessing device performance across variable aortic anatomy. Endovascular arch repair using proximal ascending aortic landing zones, exemplified by the Nexus device, may provide a viable option in patients with complex geometry. This shape-size framework represents a step toward personalized patient selection and improved long-term outcomes.
ER -