Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,618 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in psychology

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on diagnostic delay in rare cancers and options for patient support: a qualitative interview study.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland), Utrecht, Netherlands.
  2. 2Department of General Practice and Nursing Science, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  3. 3Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  4. 4Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  5. 5Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Abstract

Purpose

Delayed diagnosis in rare cancers can lead to disease progression, limited treatment options, and psychological distress, resulting in poorer quality of life and disability. We explored healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions of diagnostic delay in rare cancers and options for patient support.Materials and methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 HCPs involved in rare cancer care. Interview topics covered diagnostic challenges, causes of delays, consequences for patients, and support options. Data were analyzed thematically.Results

Three main themes emerged: (1) Time, intuition, and a safety-net fill the gap when signs are present, but not obvious. HCPs balance clinical intuition with safety-netting to avoid mis-, under-, or overdiagnosis when symptoms are vague, (2) Balancing speed and care in a fast-paced, complex diagnostic phase. Once cancer is suspected, the trajectory accelerates, yet systemic delays persist, and (3) Striving for precision: the paradox of reaching a diagnosis. While HCPs pursue diagnostic clarity, uncertainty often causes patients more distress than the diagnosis.Conclusion

HCPs manage the diagnostic trajectory of rare cancers through clinical judgment, safety-netting, and clear communication. As systemic delays and patient distress remain, early psychosocial support may help. Future research should define diagnostic delay, assess its impact, and identify support options.

Related

  1. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation in perioperative and cancer care in the Netherlands: A qualitative interview study
    Iris Kramer, Annephine H. Cahn, Naomi A. van Westen-Lagerweij +2
    Tobacco Prevention & CessationPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Accessibility of essential medicines and vaccines among fisherfolk, artisanal miners and pastoralists in Mainland Tanzania: a qualitative study of barriers and strategies from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and community leaders.
    Lawrencia D Mushi, Noel O Otieno
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Healthcare professionals’ experiences of providing care for patients with Graves’ disease: a qualitative interview study in Swedish secondary care
    Agneta Lindo, Sara Alsén, Andreas Fors +1
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossref
  4. What is an ideal mHealth for post-discharge home care of CHD: perspectives from primary caregivers, healthcare professionals, and project technical consultants: a qualitative research study
    Ruijie YangLan, Fang Ma, Qinglan Li +2
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Qualitative Assessment of Access to Community Mental Health Centers from the Perspectives of Patients, Patient Relatives, and Healthcare Professionals
    Sultan Kökcealan, Yeşim Maçça Polat, Ayşe Okanlı +3
    Psikiyatride Güncel YaklaşımlarPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{krause2026healthcare,
  title = {{Healthcare professionals' perspectives on diagnostic delay in rare cancers and options for patient support: a qualitative interview study.}},
  author = {Femke Krause and Liza A Hoveling and Rosalie Wilbrink and Denise Abbel and Kristel M van Asselt and Filip de Vos and Saskia F A Duijts},
  journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1945741},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43011747},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Healthcare professionals' perspectives on diagnostic delay in rare cancers and options for patient support: a qualitative interview study.
AU  - Femke Krause
AU  - Liza A Hoveling
AU  - Rosalie Wilbrink
AU  - Denise Abbel
AU  - Kristel M van Asselt
AU  - Filip de Vos
AU  - Saskia F A Duijts
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - Frontiers in psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1945741
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43011747
AB  - Purpose  Delayed diagnosis in rare cancers can lead to disease progression, limited treatment options, and psychological distress, resulting in poorer quality of life and disability. We explored healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions of diagnostic delay in rare cancers and options for patient support.Materials and methods  Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 HCPs involved in rare cancer care. Interview topics covered diagnostic challenges, causes of delays, consequences for patients, and support options. Data were analyzed thematically.Results  Three main themes emerged: (1) Time, intuition, and a safety-net fill the gap when signs are present, but not obvious. HCPs balance clinical intuition with safety-netting to avoid mis-, under-, or overdiagnosis when symptoms are vague, (2) Balancing speed and care in a fast-paced, complex diagnostic phase. Once cancer is suspected, the trajectory accelerates, yet systemic delays persist, and (3) Striving for precision: the paradox of reaching a diagnosis. While HCPs pursue diagnostic clarity, uncertainty often causes patients more distress than the diagnosis.Conclusion  HCPs manage the diagnostic trajectory of rare cancers through clinical judgment, safety-netting, and clear communication. As systemic delays and patient distress remain, early psychosocial support may help. Future research should define diagnostic delay, assess its impact, and identify support options.
SN  - 1664-1078
ER  -