Contrasting relationships between evolved consumer diversity and productivity for essential vs. substitutable resources
- 1Umeå University
Abstract
Any mechanistic biodiversity-ecosystem functioning theory must explain how biodiversity in natural communities arises, which requires an evolutionary metacommunity perspective. Using a model of adaptive evolution of competitive metacommunities in landscapes with spatially heterogeneous supply of two resources, we studied the evolution of resource-uptake specialization as a function of resource type (substitutable/essential) and trade-off shape between resource-uptake affinities (generalist-/specialist-favouring). We identified "critical essentiality" as a key phenomenon separating parameter regions with fundamentally different biodiversity--ecosystem function relationships. Specifically, while greater spatial heterogeneity in resource supply increases biodiversity, this comes at the cost of reduced productivity when resources are essential. Moreover, when resources are essential, both generalist- and specialist-favoring trade-offs select for phenotypes that prevent efficient resource partitioning, leading to low resource use efficiency and consumer biomass - despite often high species richness. In contrast, when resources are substitutable, a specialist-favoring affinity trade-off selects for phenotypes that partition resources efficiently, promoting a metacommunity of only two species characterized by high functional diversity, resource use efficiency, and biomass. Overall, our analyses thus suggest that conditions promoting the evolution of diverse consumer communities often do not engender higher functional richness, consumer biomass, or resource use efficiency.
Related
- Functional diversity complements taxonomical diversity in productivity-biodiversity relationships in freshwaters
- Nitrogen‐Driven Changes in Canopy Structure Enhance Productivity and Efficiency of Guineagrass (Megathyrsus maximus) cv. BRS Quênia Across Contrasting Growing Seasons
- Divergent climate-growth relationships of co-occurring pioneer species under contrasting stand histories in temperate secondary forests
- Leaf-root trait relationships in Fabaceae and Poaceae forage species under contrasting nitrogen addition forms and levels
- Canopy structural diversity mediates the effect of climate on primary productivity in forests
BibTeX
@misc{gopakumar2026contrasting,
title = {{Contrasting relationships between evolved consumer diversity and productivity for essential vs. substitutable resources}},
author = {A. Gopakumar and S. Diehl and A. Brännström},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.08.757349},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.757349v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Contrasting relationships between evolved consumer diversity and productivity for essential vs. substitutable resources
AU - A. Gopakumar
AU - S. Diehl
AU - A. Brännström
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.08.757349
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.757349v1
AB - Any mechanistic biodiversity-ecosystem functioning theory must explain how biodiversity in natural communities arises, which requires an evolutionary metacommunity perspective. Using a model of adaptive evolution of competitive metacommunities in landscapes with spatially heterogeneous supply of two resources, we studied the evolution of resource-uptake specialization as a function of resource type (substitutable/essential) and trade-off shape between resource-uptake affinities (generalist-/specialist-favouring). We identified "critical essentiality" as a key phenomenon separating parameter regions with fundamentally different biodiversity--ecosystem function relationships. Specifically, while greater spatial heterogeneity in resource supply increases biodiversity, this comes at the cost of reduced productivity when resources are essential. Moreover, when resources are essential, both generalist- and specialist-favoring trade-offs select for phenotypes that prevent efficient resource partitioning, leading to low resource use efficiency and consumer biomass - despite often high species richness. In contrast, when resources are substitutable, a specialist-favoring affinity trade-off selects for phenotypes that partition resources efficiently, promoting a metacommunity of only two species characterized by high functional diversity, resource use efficiency, and biomass. Overall, our analyses thus suggest that conditions promoting the evolution of diverse consumer communities often do not engender higher functional richness, consumer biomass, or resource use efficiency.
ER -