Functional diversity complements taxonomical diversity in productivity-biodiversity relationships in freshwaters
Abstract
Productivity is widely considered a key driver of biodiversity, yet whether taxonomic and functional diversity respond similarly to productivity gradients remains unclear. Using phosphorus as an indicator for productivity gradient, we compiled 78 freshwater datasets spanning > 30,000 sites globally to test how productivity–biodiversity relationships (PBRs) vary across diversity dimensions, trophic groups, and ecosystems. We show that PBRs are predominantly unimodal across taxonomic and functional dimensions, with slightly weaker curvature for functional diversity. Unimodal PBRs are more pronounced in producers than in consumers and show stronger curvature in lakes than in rivers. Functional reorganization also varies along the phosphorus gradient, with the clearest contraction in resource-related trait space and marked shifts in community functional centroids. Climatic, geographic and human land-use gradients further modify PBR shape. These findings indicate that predicting biodiversity responses to productivity benefits from considering functional diversity, ecological context, and broad-scale environmental gradients.
Related
- Reef fish biodiversity guarantees productivity
- Contrasting relationships between evolved consumer diversity and productivity for essential vs. substitutable resources
- Causal analysis of rock-biodiversity relationships over the global Phanerozoic challenges rock record bias and common cause hypothesis
- Evenness and Taylor's law scaling shape biodiversity-stability relationships in subtropical estuarine communities
- Moisture and material shape microbial communities in the built environment through disturbance–productivity relationships
BibTeX
@article{liu2026functional,
title = {{Functional diversity complements taxonomical diversity in productivity-biodiversity relationships in freshwaters}},
author = {Guohao Liu and Caio Graco-Roza and Wenfei Liao and Ramiro Martín-Devasa and Laura Castañeda-Gómez and Anette Teittinen and Xinxin Qi and Yuying Li and Xiaodong Qu and Mikołaj Kokociński and Naicheng Wu and Janne Soininen},
journal = {Communications Earth \& Environment},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s43247-026-04169-5},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-04169-5},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Functional diversity complements taxonomical diversity in productivity-biodiversity relationships in freshwaters
AU - Guohao Liu
AU - Caio Graco-Roza
AU - Wenfei Liao
AU - Ramiro Martín-Devasa
AU - Laura Castañeda-Gómez
AU - Anette Teittinen
AU - Xinxin Qi
AU - Yuying Li
AU - Xiaodong Qu
AU - Mikołaj Kokociński
AU - Naicheng Wu
AU - Janne Soininen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
JO - Communications Earth & Environment
DO - 10.1038/s43247-026-04169-5
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-04169-5
AB - Productivity is widely considered a key driver of biodiversity, yet whether taxonomic and functional diversity respond similarly to productivity gradients remains unclear. Using phosphorus as an indicator for productivity gradient, we compiled 78 freshwater datasets spanning > 30,000 sites globally to test how productivity–biodiversity relationships (PBRs) vary across diversity dimensions, trophic groups, and ecosystems. We show that PBRs are predominantly unimodal across taxonomic and functional dimensions, with slightly weaker curvature for functional diversity. Unimodal PBRs are more pronounced in producers than in consumers and show stronger curvature in lakes than in rivers. Functional reorganization also varies along the phosphorus gradient, with the clearest contraction in resource-related trait space and marked shifts in community functional centroids. Climatic, geographic and human land-use gradients further modify PBR shape. These findings indicate that predicting biodiversity responses to productivity benefits from considering functional diversity, ecological context, and broad-scale environmental gradients.
SN - 2662-4435
ER -