Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A finite arithmetic form of Robin's inequality and its equivalence to the Riemann hypothesis

Abstract

Robin's inequality reformulates the Riemann hypothesis as a bound on the sum-of-divisors function σ. We introduce a finite-truncation version of Robin's inequality determined intrinsically by the arithmetic structure of n, σ(n)/n < eγ∑j=0ω(n) ((lnlnln n)j)/j!, n>5040, where ω(n) denotes the number of distinct prime factors of n, and γ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. The resulting bound is pointwise stronger than Robin's inequality and we prove it unconditionally for integers with ω(n)≤ 6, primorials, odd integers and square-free integers. We also prove that this inequality is equivalent to Robin's inequality, and hence to the Riemann hypothesis. Consequently, the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the truncated inequality holding for all colossally abundant numbers. We further show that if the inequality fails, its minimal counterexample must be a superabundant number, placing any obstruction within a rigid extremal class of integers.

Related

  1. Currently, there are no reasons to doubt the Riemann Hypothesis: The zeta function beyond the realm of computation
    David W. Farmer
    Bulletin of the American Mathematical SocietyPeer-reviewedLicence not stated5 citedAlgebra & number theoryOpenAlex
  2. A Formal Proof of Riemann Hypothesis from Existence Alone, the Sign Excepted by Theorem: The Constructed Witness, the Identity Cone over the Fixed Locus, the Grounded Counter-Model, and the Cure Theorem Proved in Lean 4 and Re-executed in Fortran
    Mohammad Islam
    PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text9 citedAlgebra & number theoryOpenAlex
  3. Ramanujan Conjecture and Riemann Hypothesis for the unitary groups over function fields
    Luis Alberto Lomelí
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis through the limit of an approximated ξ function
    Enrico Pier Giorgio Cadeddu
    OSF PreprintsPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsOSF
  5. Computational verification of the Riemann hypothesis via differential equations
    W Oukil
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryDynamical systemsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{mishra2026finite,
  title = {{A finite arithmetic form of Robin's inequality and its equivalence to the Riemann hypothesis}},
  author = {Challenger Mishra and Rahul Sarkar},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.26787},
  eprint = {2609.26787},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26787},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A finite arithmetic form of Robin's inequality and its equivalence to the Riemann hypothesis
AU  - Challenger Mishra
AU  - Rahul Sarkar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.26787
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26787
AB  - Robin's inequality reformulates the Riemann hypothesis as a bound on the sum-of-divisors function σ. We introduce a finite-truncation version of Robin's inequality determined intrinsically by the arithmetic structure of n, σ(n)/n < e^γ∑_j=0^ω(n) ((lnlnln n)^j)/j!, n>5040, where ω(n) denotes the number of distinct prime factors of n, and γ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. The resulting bound is pointwise stronger than Robin's inequality and we prove it unconditionally for integers with ω(n)≤ 6, primorials, odd integers and square-free integers. We also prove that this inequality is equivalent to Robin's inequality, and hence to the Riemann hypothesis. Consequently, the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the truncated inequality holding for all colossally abundant numbers. We further show that if the inequality fails, its minimal counterexample must be a superabundant number, placing any obstruction within a rigid extremal class of integers.
ER  -