Comparison of three routine methods for the identification of Kerstersia gyiorum from routine diagnostics and review of the literature
- 1Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology
- 2Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH
- 3Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology
Abstract
Introduction: Since its first description in 2003, clinical case reports have repeatedly documented that the bacterial species Kerstersia gyiorum is a human pathogen. K. gyiorum has been described in the context of wound and middle ear infections, has been found in urine samples, and has even been recognized as a causative agent of septicemia. However, the pathogenic potential of K. gyiorum cannot be clearly determined due to the current lack of information about this species. To reveal the clinical significance of K. gyiorum , it is therefore essential to first create a clearly defined reference collection of isolates obtained from routine clinical diagnostics.
Methods: The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate method for identifying K. gyiorum in routine diagnostics. To this end, three widely used routine methods (VITEK 2, MALDI-TOF MS, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing) were employed, and the accuracy of their results for K. gyiorum identification was compared. To ensure accurate species identification, dDDH (an NGS-based identification strategy) was used as the reference method. Furthermore, this manuscript provides an overview of all cases reported in the literature to date and discusses the accuracy of the identification results reported in these studies. In addition, genomic studies (pangenome and ANI matrix) were conducted using in silico analyses to investigate the clonal relationships among the isolates.
Results: The results show that MALDI-TOF MS is best suited for identifying K. gyiorum in routine diagnostics. However, in contrast to most publications, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was not suitable, as it was impossible to distinguish K. gyiorum from other members of the Alcaligenaceae family. The VITEK 2 system must also be considered unreliable for the correct identification of K. gyiorum . Additionally, this study identified a candidate for an undescribed species of the genus Kerstersia.
Discussion: MALDI-TOF MS is well suited for expanding the reference collection directly from routine diagnostics. The results of 16S gene sequencing should be interpreted with caution. Conversely, biochemical methods must be regarded as unreliable. The species’ large core genome suggests a specialized previously unknown specialized ecological niche. Furthermore, two distinct clusters within the reference collection suggest a common origin. Additionally, follow-up studies must determine whether one isolate that cannot be unambiguously assigned to a species represents a previously undescribed member of the genus Kerstersia.
Related
- Interlaboratory comparison of molecular detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in routine diagnostic laboratories
- Revisiting Identification Thresholds of Specific Learning Disorders ( SLD ) in Gifted Children ( GC ). A Comparison of Three Groups: Twice‐Exceptional ( TE ) Children, GC Without SLD and Non‐ GC With SLD
- AI-Based Comparison of UniProt annotations and Literature Across Human Kinases
- Comparison of anomaly detection and supervised learning for acute myeloid leukemia blast identification: A proof-of-concept study
- Isolation, identification, and pathogenicity comparison of three NADC30-like PRRSV variants with distinct mutational patterns
BibTeX
@article{purschwitz2026comparison,
title = {{Comparison of three routine methods for the identification of Kerstersia gyiorum from routine diagnostics and review of the literature}},
author = {Lara Purschwitz and Boyke Bunk and Percy Schröttner},
journal = {Frontiers in Microbiology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fmicb.2026.1901541},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1901541/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of three routine methods for the identification of Kerstersia gyiorum from routine diagnostics and review of the literature
AU - Lara Purschwitz
AU - Boyke Bunk
AU - Percy Schröttner
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - Frontiers in Microbiology
DO - 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1901541
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1901541/full
AB - Introduction: Since its first description in 2003, clinical case reports have repeatedly documented that the bacterial species Kerstersia gyiorum is a human pathogen. K. gyiorum has been described in the context of wound and middle ear infections, has been found in urine samples, and has even been recognized as a causative agent of septicemia. However, the pathogenic potential of K. gyiorum cannot be clearly determined due to the current lack of information about this species. To reveal the clinical significance of K. gyiorum , it is therefore essential to first create a clearly defined reference collection of isolates obtained from routine clinical diagnostics. Methods: The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate method for identifying K. gyiorum in routine diagnostics. To this end, three widely used routine methods (VITEK 2, MALDI-TOF MS, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing) were employed, and the accuracy of their results for K. gyiorum identification was compared. To ensure accurate species identification, dDDH (an NGS-based identification strategy) was used as the reference method. Furthermore, this manuscript provides an overview of all cases reported in the literature to date and discusses the accuracy of the identification results reported in these studies. In addition, genomic studies (pangenome and ANI matrix) were conducted using in silico analyses to investigate the clonal relationships among the isolates. Results: The results show that MALDI-TOF MS is best suited for identifying K. gyiorum in routine diagnostics. However, in contrast to most publications, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was not suitable, as it was impossible to distinguish K. gyiorum from other members of the Alcaligenaceae family. The VITEK 2 system must also be considered unreliable for the correct identification of K. gyiorum . Additionally, this study identified a candidate for an undescribed species of the genus Kerstersia. Discussion: MALDI-TOF MS is well suited for expanding the reference collection directly from routine diagnostics. The results of 16S gene sequencing should be interpreted with caution. Conversely, biochemical methods must be regarded as unreliable. The species’ large core genome suggests a specialized previously unknown specialized ecological niche. Furthermore, two distinct clusters within the reference collection suggest a common origin. Additionally, follow-up studies must determine whether one isolate that cannot be unambiguously assigned to a species represents a previously undescribed member of the genus Kerstersia.
SN - 1664-302X
ER -