Ecological Momentary Assessments of Daily Pain Experiences in Bothersome and High-Impact Chronic Pain.
4 affiliations
- 1Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
- 2Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
- 4Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
Background
High-impact chronic pain (HICP), defined as persistent pain substantially limiting daily activities, affects millions of adults and poses a public health challenge. However, as prior knowledge comes largely from retrospective self-report measures, little is known about how HICP manifests in daily life.Methods
This study used the comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of pain (cEMAp) instrument to assess pain-related experiences four times daily over 7 days in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised, we compared individuals with HICP (n = 66) with bothersome chronic pain (n = 41), a group with similar pain frequency but less interference with daily activities. Each prompt assessed pain intensity, interference, cognitions, behaviours, coping strategies, and pain characteristics over the preceding 2 h.Results
Both groups reported similar pain intensity levels, but the HICP group reported more frequent interference with physical, mental, and social activities. No group differences emerged in daily mood or negative pain-related cognitions. Exploratory analyses suggested that many daily experiences were similar across groups, with differences observed in selected pain qualities, coping strategies, and pain behaviours. Analyses of response distributions showed some similarity across groups in many experiences.Conclusions
The most consistent distinction between the groups was interference frequency, consistent with the operationalization of HICP as pain that disrupts daily functioning, while several other pain-related experiences were similar across groups. cEMAp data complement traditional retrospective assessment by providing a more detailed view of biopsychosocial aspects of chronic pain in everyday life.Significance statement
Prior understanding of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) has largely relied on retrospective measures. Using the comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of pain (cEMAp) instrument, we found that HICP was distinguished primarily by more frequent interference with daily activities rather than greater pain intensity. Our findings also reveal similarities and differences across other pain-related experiences, highlighting the value of multidimensional real-world assessment beyond pain intensity alone.
Related
- Ecological momentary assessments predict clinical anxiety and depression status at 3 months post-stroke
- From Who experiences stress to When It Occurs: Revisiting Lazarus’ transactional model of stress using an ecological momentary assessment framework
- Leveraging ecological momentary assessment and dynamic structural equation modeling to identify idiographic antecedents of child irritability and defiance
- Ecological momentary assessment of anxiety and depression in individuals with early-treated phenylketonuria
- Baseline depressive-symptom severity and divergent psychological trajectories during GIP and/or GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy: a prospective ecological momentary assessment study
BibTeX
@article{walentynowicz2026ecological,
title = {{Ecological Momentary Assessments of Daily Pain Experiences in Bothersome and High-Impact Chronic Pain.}},
author = {Marta Walentynowicz and Doerte U Junghaenel and Sean C Mackey and Michael Von Korff and Arthur A Stone},
journal = {European journal of pain (London, England)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/ejp.70439},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42960843},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Ecological Momentary Assessments of Daily Pain Experiences in Bothersome and High-Impact Chronic Pain.
AU - Marta Walentynowicz
AU - Doerte U Junghaenel
AU - Sean C Mackey
AU - Michael Von Korff
AU - Arthur A Stone
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - European journal of pain (London, England)
DO - 10.1002/ejp.70439
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42960843
AB - Background High-impact chronic pain (HICP), defined as persistent pain substantially limiting daily activities, affects millions of adults and poses a public health challenge. However, as prior knowledge comes largely from retrospective self-report measures, little is known about how HICP manifests in daily life.Methods This study used the comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of pain (cEMAp) instrument to assess pain-related experiences four times daily over 7 days in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised, we compared individuals with HICP (n = 66) with bothersome chronic pain (n = 41), a group with similar pain frequency but less interference with daily activities. Each prompt assessed pain intensity, interference, cognitions, behaviours, coping strategies, and pain characteristics over the preceding 2 h.Results Both groups reported similar pain intensity levels, but the HICP group reported more frequent interference with physical, mental, and social activities. No group differences emerged in daily mood or negative pain-related cognitions. Exploratory analyses suggested that many daily experiences were similar across groups, with differences observed in selected pain qualities, coping strategies, and pain behaviours. Analyses of response distributions showed some similarity across groups in many experiences.Conclusions The most consistent distinction between the groups was interference frequency, consistent with the operationalization of HICP as pain that disrupts daily functioning, while several other pain-related experiences were similar across groups. cEMAp data complement traditional retrospective assessment by providing a more detailed view of biopsychosocial aspects of chronic pain in everyday life.Significance statement Prior understanding of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) has largely relied on retrospective measures. Using the comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of pain (cEMAp) instrument, we found that HICP was distinguished primarily by more frequent interference with daily activities rather than greater pain intensity. Our findings also reveal similarities and differences across other pain-related experiences, highlighting the value of multidimensional real-world assessment beyond pain intensity alone.
SN - 1090-3801
SN - 1532-2149
ER -