The value of mortality data to advance learning and decision-making dynamics in Mozambique's health system.
11 affiliations
- 1Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. [email protected].
- 2University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. [email protected].
- 3Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Moçambique. [email protected].
- 4Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
- 5University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- 6University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
- 7Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Moçambique.
- 8Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHMT, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
- 9ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
- 10Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Moçambique.
- 11Faculty of Medicine, University Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Abstract
Introduction
There is a lack of evidence on whether and how health systems stakeholders in Mozambique learn from routine health data. Despite the recurring claim by the stakeholders themselves that data in general should be the centre of informed public health policy, it remains unclear how decision-makers and managers access, interpret, and use mortality data for learning and decision-making. Using the Learning Health System (LHS) lens, we examined how mortality data are accessed, interpreted, and used across system levels in Mozambique.Methods
We conducted a qualitative case study from September to November 2024, involving 20 key informants from the Ministry of Health at both national and subnational levels, non-governmental organisations, data producers, and users. Data were collected in the districts of Manhiça and Quelimane in Mozambique, through semi-structured interviews, transcribed, coded, and thematically analysed using NVivo12, guided by the LHS dimensions: learning levels, learning loops, and means of learning.Results
Participants recognised the value of mortality data for learning and decision-making, but routine use remained uneven. At the central Ministry of Health level, mortality data informed strategic adjustment and emerging double-loop learning, particularly through reprioritisation, planning, and resource reallocation discussions. At the subnational level, mortality data mainly supported single-loop learning, where routine reports and outbreak signals triggered immediate adjustments in clinical practice and public health response. Delays in data access, low data literacy among decision-makers, fragmented information systems, and centralised decision-making appear to be the greatest challenges to the effective use of mortality data. Budget authority also remains centralised, and allocation decisions are largely locked into the wage bill rather than the system's needs in terms of functionality. Heavy dependence on central directives limits local autonomy and its ability to act, preventing new ways of learning and working.Conclusion
Mortality data already support operational and strategic learning in Mozambique, particularly through single- and double-loop processes. Systemic transformation in how the system learns remains limited and is exacerbated by structural barriers within the health system. Priorities include improving timely access to mortality information across levels, strengthening analytical and interpretive capacity, integrating fragmented systems, and widening delegated decision space, which will ultimately enhance evidence-based planning, local action, and health system learning.
Related
- Patient-Reported Shared Decision-Making and Documented Advance Care Planning Among Adults With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias
- ‘Now we know why our children are dying’: community and health authorities perspectives on minimally invasive tissue sampling and verbal autopsy for mortality surveillance in Mozambique
- Video Decision Support and Advance Care Planning in Older Adults With Advanced Kidney Disease: The VIDEO-KD Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Forecasting alcohol lapse risk up to two weeks in advance using time-lagged machine learning models
- Mortality dynamics of West Nile virus and Lyme disease in the United States : Temporal, spatial, and socioeconomic dimensions (2003–2021)
BibTeX
@article{magaco2026value,
title = {{The value of mortality data to advance learning and decision-making dynamics in Mozambique's health system.}},
author = {Amilcar Magaço and Fabrizio Tediosi and Inácio Mandomando and Mirko S Winkler and Khátia Munguambe and Daniel Cobos Muñoz},
journal = {Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s13690-026-02044-5},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43010035},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The value of mortality data to advance learning and decision-making dynamics in Mozambique's health system.
AU - Amilcar Magaço
AU - Fabrizio Tediosi
AU - Inácio Mandomando
AU - Mirko S Winkler
AU - Khátia Munguambe
AU - Daniel Cobos Muñoz
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/01
JO - Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
DO - 10.1186/s13690-026-02044-5
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43010035
AB - Introduction There is a lack of evidence on whether and how health systems stakeholders in Mozambique learn from routine health data. Despite the recurring claim by the stakeholders themselves that data in general should be the centre of informed public health policy, it remains unclear how decision-makers and managers access, interpret, and use mortality data for learning and decision-making. Using the Learning Health System (LHS) lens, we examined how mortality data are accessed, interpreted, and used across system levels in Mozambique.Methods We conducted a qualitative case study from September to November 2024, involving 20 key informants from the Ministry of Health at both national and subnational levels, non-governmental organisations, data producers, and users. Data were collected in the districts of Manhiça and Quelimane in Mozambique, through semi-structured interviews, transcribed, coded, and thematically analysed using NVivo12, guided by the LHS dimensions: learning levels, learning loops, and means of learning.Results Participants recognised the value of mortality data for learning and decision-making, but routine use remained uneven. At the central Ministry of Health level, mortality data informed strategic adjustment and emerging double-loop learning, particularly through reprioritisation, planning, and resource reallocation discussions. At the subnational level, mortality data mainly supported single-loop learning, where routine reports and outbreak signals triggered immediate adjustments in clinical practice and public health response. Delays in data access, low data literacy among decision-makers, fragmented information systems, and centralised decision-making appear to be the greatest challenges to the effective use of mortality data. Budget authority also remains centralised, and allocation decisions are largely locked into the wage bill rather than the system's needs in terms of functionality. Heavy dependence on central directives limits local autonomy and its ability to act, preventing new ways of learning and working.Conclusion Mortality data already support operational and strategic learning in Mozambique, particularly through single- and double-loop processes. Systemic transformation in how the system learns remains limited and is exacerbated by structural barriers within the health system. Priorities include improving timely access to mortality information across levels, strengthening analytical and interpretive capacity, integrating fragmented systems, and widening delegated decision space, which will ultimately enhance evidence-based planning, local action, and health system learning.
SN - 0778-7367
SN - 2049-3258
ER -