Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Measurement Complexity of Quantum Compressed Sensing

Abstract

Conventional compressed sensing (CS) has a measurement lower bound of M = Ω(K log(N/K)) under non-adaptive measurements. Recent experiments on quantum compressed sensing (QCS) have reported numbers of measurements below this classical lower bound. In this work, we establish lower bounds on the measurement complexity of QCS from an information-theoretic and quantum-physical perspective. QCS exploits quantum parallelism, enabling a unitary domain-alignment evolution to act on a superposition of all N basis states and map the sparse basis onto the measurement basis in a one-to-one manner. Consequently, the locations of nonzero components are explicitly carried by measurement-index labels. If only basic statistical information about the K nonzero components is required, the total number of effective index samples satisfies the coarse necessary condition Ms = Ω(K). Under independent single-index projective measurements, when the support is unknown, the nonzero probabilities satisfy pn = Θ(1/K), and exact support recovery is required with a fixed success probability, the sampling-coverage requirement leads to Ms = Θ(K ln K). If each nonzero amplitude coefficient is further required to achieve a coordinate-wise relative root-mean-square error ε, the optimal effective index sample complexity is Ms = Θ(K ln K + K/ε2), which reduces to Θ(K ln K) for fixed ε. Multimode photon-number-resolving detection can reduce the number of experimental rounds but not the total effective index sample complexity. These results show that quantum parallelism is not only a core resource for quantum computing but can also play a transformative role in measurement science.

Related

  1. Sample Complexity for Generative Learning of Quantum Measurement Data
    Shuhan Zhang, Yi-Zhuang You
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Beyond Direct Imaging: Quantum Measurement Design for Small-Target Detection in UAV Hyperspectral Sensing
    Qipeng Qian, Jialiang Jin, Shihao Wang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. When Measurement Constraints Favor Quantum Computational Sensing for Stealthy Power-Grid Attack Detection
    Saisubramaniam Gopalakrishnan, Supreeth B S, Pranav Sarda +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Phase Transition in Binary Compressed Sensing via Annealing with Adaptive Regularization
    Xiaoxin Huang, Masayuki Ohzeki
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Recovery of directional wave spectrum from sparse data with compressed sensing
    Qingyu Jiang, Henrik Kalisch, Michel Benoit +2
    Frontiers in Marine SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOceanography & cryosphereFluid dynamicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{hu2026measurement,
  title = {{Measurement Complexity of Quantum Compressed Sensing}},
  author = {Jianyong Hu and Wei Li},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.08234},
  eprint = {2610.08234},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08234},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Measurement Complexity of Quantum Compressed Sensing
AU  - Jianyong Hu
AU  - Wei Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.08234
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08234
AB  - Conventional compressed sensing (CS) has a measurement lower bound of M = Ω(K log(N/K)) under non-adaptive measurements. Recent experiments on quantum compressed sensing (QCS) have reported numbers of measurements below this classical lower bound. In this work, we establish lower bounds on the measurement complexity of QCS from an information-theoretic and quantum-physical perspective. QCS exploits quantum parallelism, enabling a unitary domain-alignment evolution to act on a superposition of all N basis states and map the sparse basis onto the measurement basis in a one-to-one manner. Consequently, the locations of nonzero components are explicitly carried by measurement-index labels. If only basic statistical information about the K nonzero components is required, the total number of effective index samples satisfies the coarse necessary condition Ms = Ω(K). Under independent single-index projective measurements, when the support is unknown, the nonzero probabilities satisfy pn = Θ(1/K), and exact support recovery is required with a fixed success probability, the sampling-coverage requirement leads to Ms = Θ(K ln K). If each nonzero amplitude coefficient is further required to achieve a coordinate-wise relative root-mean-square error ε, the optimal effective index sample complexity is Ms = Θ(K ln K + K/ε2), which reduces to Θ(K ln K) for fixed ε. Multimode photon-number-resolving detection can reduce the number of experimental rounds but not the total effective index sample complexity. These results show that quantum parallelism is not only a core resource for quantum computing but can also play a transformative role in measurement science.
ER  -