Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,049 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism

Non‐Invasive Fibrosis Testing in Adults With Obesity and MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

7 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Surgery Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
  2. 2Bariatric Unit, Department of General Surgery Clínica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
  3. 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
  4. 4Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction Imperial College London London UK
  5. 5Area of Practice Improvement and Innovation in Nursing Clínica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
  6. 6Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK
  7. 7Department of Endocrinology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK

Abstract

Aims: Adults with obesity are at increased risk of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)‐related fibrosis, but the diagnostic performance of non‐invasive tests (NITs) in this population remains uncertain. This meta‐analysis evaluated NITs for detecting significant (≥F2) and advanced (≥F3) fibrosis in adults with obesity and MASLD.

Materials and Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 1 December 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and MASLD, compared an NIT with liver biopsy, and provided data to estimate sensitivity and specificity. Pooled estimates were derived using bivariate random‐effects models; HSROC curves were generated for each test and fibrosis threshold.

Results: Twenty‐seven studies including 5034 participants were included. Mean age was 40.6 ± 11.4 years and mean BMI was 43.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2. For significant fibrosis (≥F2), vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE) showed a sensitivity of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49–0.77) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66–0.85), with a median threshold of 7.95 kPa (IQR, 7.60–12.00). FIB‐4 showed broadly comparable performance, with a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53–0.75) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64–0.86). For advanced fibrosis (≥F3), VCTE showed a sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67–0.85) and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.90), with a median threshold of 10.73 kPa (IQR, 8.15–12.80). Serum‐based tests showed more variable operating characteristics. Post hoc threshold analyses showed the expected trade‐off between sensitivity and specificity at lower VCTE cut‐offs.

Conclusions: In adults with obesity and MASLD, VCTE showed the most consistent diagnostic performance, particularly for advanced fibrosis, whereas serum‐based tests demonstrated more variable operating characteristics. Threshold selection and technical feasibility remain important determinants of performance, highlighting the need for validated obesity‐specific thresholds and diagnostic pathways.

Related

  1. Cardiorespiratory fitness is inversely associated with non-invasive markers of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis: a cross-sectional study of 39,197 UK adults.
    Scott A Willis, Kevin Deighton, Christopher Goodwin +8
    BMC gastroenterologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Urinary organophosphate flame retardants and risk of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity among middle-aged and older adults: a systematic investigation integrating epidemiological and adverse outcome pathway analyses
    Cheng Zheng, Shuqi Ren, Jiayin Li +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Viscoelastic haemostatic assay-guided transfusion versus conventional coagulation testing in critically ill non-cardiac adults with active bleeding or clinically significant coagulopathy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dilson Palhares Ferreira, Anna Theresa Salvador Oliveira, Sofia Nepomuceno Gorini +5
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of interventions for adults with simple obesity: Study protocol
    Lingyao Sun, Lizhen Xu, Dachuang Zhou +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOS
  5. Reported cardiovascular events and cardiometabolic risk markers with orforglipron and danuglipron in adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Guanglan Zou, Cheng Yang, Qi Wu +2
    Diabetology & Metabolic SyndromePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
BibTeX
@article{ortega2026noninvasive,
  title = {{Non‐Invasive Fibrosis Testing in Adults With Obesity and MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis}},
  author = {Patricia M. Ortega and Lucas Sabatella and Pinelopi Manousou and Adriana Arregui and Ahmed R. Ahmed and Chioma Izzi‐Engbeaya},
  journal = {Diabetes, Obesity \& Metabolism},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1111/dom.71357},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71357},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Non‐Invasive Fibrosis Testing in Adults With Obesity and MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
AU  - Patricia M. Ortega
AU  - Lucas Sabatella
AU  - Pinelopi Manousou
AU  - Adriana Arregui
AU  - Ahmed R. Ahmed
AU  - Chioma Izzi‐Engbeaya
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
JO  - Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
DO  - 10.1111/dom.71357
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71357
AB  - Aims: Adults with obesity are at increased risk of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)‐related fibrosis, but the diagnostic performance of non‐invasive tests (NITs) in this population remains uncertain. This meta‐analysis evaluated NITs for detecting significant (≥F2) and advanced (≥F3) fibrosis in adults with obesity and MASLD.  Materials and Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 1 December 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and MASLD, compared an NIT with liver biopsy, and provided data to estimate sensitivity and specificity. Pooled estimates were derived using bivariate random‐effects models; HSROC curves were generated for each test and fibrosis threshold.  Results: Twenty‐seven studies including 5034 participants were included. Mean age was 40.6 ± 11.4 years and mean BMI was 43.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2. For significant fibrosis (≥F2), vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE) showed a sensitivity of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49–0.77) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66–0.85), with a median threshold of 7.95 kPa (IQR, 7.60–12.00). FIB‐4 showed broadly comparable performance, with a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53–0.75) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64–0.86). For advanced fibrosis (≥F3), VCTE showed a sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67–0.85) and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.90), with a median threshold of 10.73 kPa (IQR, 8.15–12.80). Serum‐based tests showed more variable operating characteristics. Post hoc threshold analyses showed the expected trade‐off between sensitivity and specificity at lower VCTE cut‐offs.  Conclusions: In adults with obesity and MASLD, VCTE showed the most consistent diagnostic performance, particularly for advanced fibrosis, whereas serum‐based tests demonstrated more variable operating characteristics. Threshold selection and technical feasibility remain important determinants of performance, highlighting the need for validated obesity‐specific thresholds and diagnostic pathways.
SN  - 1462-8902
SN  - 1463-1326
ER  -