Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Reproductive Health

The dietary axis of endometriosis prevention: a gut microbiota-estrobolome framework situated within a multidimensional model of risk modification, early recognition, and disease management

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  3. 3Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

Abstract

Endometriosis affects approximately 5%–10% of reproductive-aged women and imposes a substantial yet underexplored preventive research gap relative to treatment-focused literature. Diet is the central axis of this review: we organize the dietary evidence around an explicit mechanistic sequence—food-group-level epidemiological risk, hypothesised to be mediated by gut-microbiota dysbiosis and the estrogen-metabolizing “estrobolome”, and thence to candidate dietary and probiotic interventions—and then situate this dietary axis within a broader multidimensional prevention framework spanning additional primary prevention (other modifiable lifestyle factors, environmental endocrine-disruptor exposure), secondary prevention (non-invasive early screening, adolescent menstrual-health education, and, as a conceptual proposal, targeted early hormonal intervention following the neo-evolutionary model of Vercellini and colleagues), and tertiary-level management of established disease. While, to our knowledge, six recent reviews and meta-analyses (2024–2026) have quantitatively synthesized randomized-trial evidence on dietary and nutraceutical interventions for endometriosis-associated pain, none situates this evidence within an explicit gut microbiota-estrobolome mechanistic framework or a broader multidimensional prevention model—the distinguishing contribution of this review. We advance this framework as a hypothesis-generating prevention research agenda rather than a set of clinically established preventive measures. Cost-effectiveness is treated as a cross-cutting dimension: endometriosis-specific economic evaluations of prevention and screening remain scarce—with a digital symptom-checker Markov model as a notable exception—so analogous frameworks from chronic-disease lifestyle-intervention economics are proposed as methodological templates. We synthesize current evidence, controversies, and priority directions, with particular emphasis on the dietary axis and its mechanistic underpinnings.

Related

  1. Adolescent Endometriosis: From Clinical Management to an Early Recognition and Prevention-Oriented Paradigm-A Narrative Review.
    Adriana Ioana Gaia-Oltean, Teodora Telecan, Laura-Ancuta Pop +3
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  2. Digital health-enabled life-course management of endometriosis: from early recognition and assisted diagnosis to symptom monitoring and self-management.
    QinQin Deng, ZiChen Shao, Min Yang
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  3. Diagnostic pathways for gastroesophageal reflux cough: From empirical recognition to MII-pH-based multidimensional assessment
    Chang Liu, Qun Wang, Lei Pan +6
    Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory DiseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Exploring multidimensional perceptions of cervical cancer severity and self-efficacy in prevention through the perspectives of patients and healthcare workers
    Siti Nur Farhana Harun, Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan, Arina Anis Azlan +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Beyond Reported Rates: A Critical Narrative Review of the Risk Architecture, Early Recognition, and Prevention of Complications in Gynecologic Laparoscopy.
    Rastko Maglic, Milica Ivanovic, Ksenija Lalic +3
    Clinics and practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{nagy2026dietary,
  title = {{The dietary axis of endometriosis prevention: a gut microbiota-estrobolome framework situated within a multidimensional model of risk modification, early recognition, and disease management}},
  author = {Sándor Nagy and Csaba Busznyák and Csilla Dézsi and Csilla Dézsi and Viktor Gulyás-Oldal and Ekaterina Paschali and Dániel Sallai and Imre Gálóczi and Imre Gálóczi and Károly Szili},
  journal = {Frontiers in Reproductive Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frph.2026.1943184},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1943184},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The dietary axis of endometriosis prevention: a gut microbiota-estrobolome framework situated within a multidimensional model of risk modification, early recognition, and disease management
AU  - Sándor Nagy
AU  - Csaba Busznyák
AU  - Csilla Dézsi
AU  - Csilla Dézsi
AU  - Viktor Gulyás-Oldal
AU  - Ekaterina Paschali
AU  - Dániel Sallai
AU  - Imre Gálóczi
AU  - Imre Gálóczi
AU  - Károly Szili
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Reproductive Health
DO  - 10.3389/frph.2026.1943184
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1943184
AB  - Endometriosis affects approximately 5%–10% of reproductive-aged women and imposes a substantial yet underexplored preventive research gap relative to treatment-focused literature. Diet is the central axis of this review: we organize the dietary evidence around an explicit mechanistic sequence—food-group-level epidemiological risk, hypothesised to be mediated by gut-microbiota dysbiosis and the estrogen-metabolizing “estrobolome”, and thence to candidate dietary and probiotic interventions—and then situate this dietary axis within a broader multidimensional prevention framework spanning additional primary prevention (other modifiable lifestyle factors, environmental endocrine-disruptor exposure), secondary prevention (non-invasive early screening, adolescent menstrual-health education, and, as a conceptual proposal, targeted early hormonal intervention following the neo-evolutionary model of Vercellini and colleagues), and tertiary-level management of established disease. While, to our knowledge, six recent reviews and meta-analyses (2024–2026) have quantitatively synthesized randomized-trial evidence on dietary and nutraceutical interventions for endometriosis-associated pain, none situates this evidence within an explicit gut microbiota-estrobolome mechanistic framework or a broader multidimensional prevention model—the distinguishing contribution of this review. We advance this framework as a hypothesis-generating prevention research agenda rather than a set of clinically established preventive measures. Cost-effectiveness is treated as a cross-cutting dimension: endometriosis-specific economic evaluations of prevention and screening remain scarce—with a digital symptom-checker Markov model as a notable exception—so analogous frameworks from chronic-disease lifestyle-intervention economics are proposed as methodological templates. We synthesize current evidence, controversies, and priority directions, with particular emphasis on the dietary axis and its mechanistic underpinnings.
SN  - 2673-3153
ER  -