Force-induced unfolding versus unbinding of a cellulosomal carbohydrate-binding module from cellulose interface
- 1Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Abstract
Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) anchor microbial cellulosomes to cellulose surfaces, aiding biomass degradation under mechanical stress. To understand how mechanical pulling affects this process, we combine steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations with acoustic force spectroscopy (AFS) to investigate Clostridium thermocellum CBM3a unbinding from cellulose under different pulling configurations (C- versus N-terminus). Our SMD simulations reveal that C-terminal pulling induces substantial CBM3a unfolding prior to unbinding, whereas N-terminal pulling results in detachment with the protein largely intact. Unbinding proceeds via two distinct mechanisms across the planar binding motif: a TRP mode (initiating via TRP135) and a TYR mode (initiating via TYR84). AFS experiments corroborate the SMD findings, showing that C-terminal pulling yields lower rupture forces and a 7.5-fold higher unbinding off-rate compared to N-terminal pulling of CBM3a from cellulose. These results demonstrate that structural asymmetry and pulling orientation critically govern the mechanical stability, unfolding pathways, and cellulose-binding dynamics of cellulosomal proteins.
Related
- Membrane Lipids and Water Shape the Unbinding Kinetics of ZM241385 from Human Adenosine A2A Receptor Variants
- Synergistic Alcalase-papain hydrolysis of egg white protein: enhancing structural unfolding, antioxidant activity, and gastrointestinal stability.
- Exploring PrP C unfolding as a critical step preceding its refolding in the context of PrP Sc propagation
- A Redox-Switchable Supramolecular Carbohydrate Chip for Capture and Real-Time Glycosylation Analysis of Living Suspension Cells
- Unfolding of the disease-linked bank vole prion protein E200K in the context of PrPSc propagation
BibTeX
@misc{santo2026forceinduced,
title = {{Force-induced unfolding versus unbinding of a cellulosomal carbohydrate-binding module from cellulose interface}},
author = {K. P. Santo and R. Murphy and M. Hackl and T. Zhong and S. P. S. Chundawat and A. V. Neimark},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.16.759631},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759631v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Force-induced unfolding versus unbinding of a cellulosomal carbohydrate-binding module from cellulose interface
AU - K. P. Santo
AU - R. Murphy
AU - M. Hackl
AU - T. Zhong
AU - S. P. S. Chundawat
AU - A. V. Neimark
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.16.759631
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759631v1
AB - Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) anchor microbial cellulosomes to cellulose surfaces, aiding biomass degradation under mechanical stress. To understand how mechanical pulling affects this process, we combine steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations with acoustic force spectroscopy (AFS) to investigate Clostridium thermocellum CBM3a unbinding from cellulose under different pulling configurations (C- versus N-terminus). Our SMD simulations reveal that C-terminal pulling induces substantial CBM3a unfolding prior to unbinding, whereas N-terminal pulling results in detachment with the protein largely intact. Unbinding proceeds via two distinct mechanisms across the planar binding motif: a TRP mode (initiating via TRP135) and a TYR mode (initiating via TYR84). AFS experiments corroborate the SMD findings, showing that C-terminal pulling yields lower rupture forces and a 7.5-fold higher unbinding off-rate compared to N-terminal pulling of CBM3a from cellulose. These results demonstrate that structural asymmetry and pulling orientation critically govern the mechanical stability, unfolding pathways, and cellulose-binding dynamics of cellulosomal proteins.
ER -