Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Propagate, Then Sharpen: Post-Hoc Refinement of Frozen Node Classifiers

Abstract

We study post-hoc refinement of frozen node classifiers: given only the graph G and class distributions Q predicted by a frozen model, can we improve accuracy without access to node features, model parameters, or gradients? APPNP answers this by propagating logits with a restart towards the initial predictions, minimizing the anchored Dirichlet energy. Instead, we consider the Potts energy, and decompose it into a Dirichlet term, which penalizes disagreement between neighbouring nodes, and a Gini term, which penalizes indecision within each node. This decomposition motivates Propagate, Then Sharpen (PtS), which alternates between propagation of class probabilities and node-wise, mass-preserving sharpening, with only one additional hyperparameter selected using labelled validation nodes. Across nine homophilic graphs, with a frozen MLP backbone, PtS improves mean test accuracy over independently tuned APPNP by $1.71$ percentage points on clean inputs and $3.90$ under severe Gaussian feature corruption. Gains over APPNP become smaller, but remain positive with frozen GCN and GraphSAGE backbones. Sharpening also removes most of the accuracy loss of deep propagation: on clean inputs without restart, accuracy falls by $2.2$ points between $2$ and $100$ propagation steps under PtS, compared with $33.8$ for APPNP.

Related

  1. Fix-and-propagate heuristics using low-precision first-order LP solutions for large-scale mixed-integer linear optimization
    Nils-Christian Kempke, Thorsten Koch
    Mathematical Programming ComputationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text10 citedNumerical analysis & scientific computingOpenAlex
  2. How Shaped Waves Propagate in Scattering Media
    David Gaspard, Arthur Goetschy
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  3. How Perturbations Propagate: A Multi-Level Analysis of Robustness in Large Language Models
    Dun Li Chan, Emily Liu, Niyathi Allu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Learn-Then-Differentiate Gradient Estimation
    Nifei Lin, Qingkai Zhang, L. Jeff Hong
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Reduced Cost Influence Functions for Predict-then-Optimize under Noisy Data
    William Zhang, Saurabh Amin, Georgia Perakis
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bentdal2026propagate,
  title = {{Propagate, Then Sharpen: Post-Hoc Refinement of Frozen Node Classifiers}},
  author = {Preben Johnsen Bentdal and Nello Blaser and Xue-Cheng Tai},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.35080},
  eprint = {2609.35080},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35080},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Propagate, Then Sharpen: Post-Hoc Refinement of Frozen Node Classifiers
AU  - Preben Johnsen Bentdal
AU  - Nello Blaser
AU  - Xue-Cheng Tai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.35080
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35080
AB  - We study post-hoc refinement of frozen node classifiers: given only the graph G and class distributions Q predicted by a frozen model, can we improve accuracy without access to node features, model parameters, or gradients? APPNP answers this by propagating logits with a restart towards the initial predictions, minimizing the anchored Dirichlet energy. Instead, we consider the Potts energy, and decompose it into a Dirichlet term, which penalizes disagreement between neighbouring nodes, and a Gini term, which penalizes indecision within each node. This decomposition motivates Propagate, Then Sharpen (PtS), which alternates between propagation of class probabilities and node-wise, mass-preserving sharpening, with only one additional hyperparameter selected using labelled validation nodes. Across nine homophilic graphs, with a frozen MLP backbone, PtS improves mean test accuracy over independently tuned APPNP by $1.71$ percentage points on clean inputs and $3.90$ under severe Gaussian feature corruption. Gains over APPNP become smaller, but remain positive with frozen GCN and GraphSAGE backbones. Sharpening also removes most of the accuracy loss of deep propagation: on clean inputs without restart, accuracy falls by $2.2$ points between $2$ and $100$ propagation steps under PtS, compared with $33.8$ for APPNP.
ER  -