Engaging clergy and congregants as “lay-scientists” to promote community health and wellbeing in rural and urban Alaska: a community-engaged pilot study
7 affiliations
- 1Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage
- 2Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University
- 3Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia
- 4Nome Church of the Nazarene
- 5Shiloh Missionary Baptist Church
- 6Turnagain United Methodist Church
- 7Department of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research Center), Stanford University School of Medicine
Abstract
Introduction: The globally implemented Our Voice citizen science method has addressed social and structural health-related barriers in many community settings. Currently, however, this participatory action research method has not been adapted and tested in faith-based settings, which are trusted and well positioned to reach communities for health promotion and chronic disease prevention. The purpose of this study is to describe our process for adapting and piloting Our Voice and report lessons that will meaningfully engage faith-based communities in health promotion.
Methods: Prior to Our Voice implementation, we used a community-academic design approach and sought input and recommendations from faith community members to increase reach and ensure Our Voice content and procedures aligned with cultural traditions. We then recruited three churches in which to pilot Our Voice and collected key process data through a baseline survey (e.g., lay-scientist demographics, physical activity behavior) and community notes (e.g., meeting attendance, lay-scientist engagement) to inform refinement of procedures. Trained research staff conducted objective environmental audits using a validated church environmental audit tool to describe the health promotion environment of each setting. Trained teams of clergy and congregants i.e., “lay-scientists”, next conducted an Our Voice environmental assessment using the Discovery Tool mobile app to evaluate each participating church’s space, features and proximal built environments.
Results: The lay-scientist teams collected a total of 216 geo-tagged photos with narratives which were used to identify church-specific themes and relevant action plans to address priority needs. Example themes and action plans include: 1) Implementing congregational health needs assessments (e.g., brief online surveys for the broader congregation); 2) displaying health messaging across the church building (e.g., physical activity and healthy eating recommendations); and 3) encouraging both congregation- and community-wide health promotion (e.g., church-sponsored health summits, gardening initiatives with local schools).
Discussion: Through multi-dimensional data audits collected by clergy and congregants, the Our Voice method fostered meaningful local data collection and analysis to identify and address community factors that may impact health. Findings provide evidence that action plans developed and implemented by faith-based community members may have a broad reach beyond the congregation and create potential opportunities for co-developing community-based health promotion programming.
Related
- Mapping local cluster separation, global community structure, and leadership concentration among the 2025 top 2% dermatology scientists : Beyond rankings
- Effectiveness of green health prescribing and nature-based interventions in primary care and community settings for older adults: a systematic review of health, wellbeing and social outcomes
- Understanding the impact of unmet needs on the health and wellbeing of people with stroke, living in the community: a scoping review of reviews
- Family and community pressure, obesity-related behaviours, and psychological wellbeing among female adolescents with overweight or obesity: a qualitative study.
- Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among beneficiaries of a community-based intervention in Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional endline evaluation of the PARBARDHAN project
BibTeX
@article{west2026engaging,
title = {{Engaging clergy and congregants as “lay-scientists” to promote community health and wellbeing in rural and urban Alaska: a community-engaged pilot study}},
author = {Nathan T. West and Megan Waddell and Diane K. King and Shirley T. Le and Sofia A. Portillo and Kelsey R. Day and Beverly R. Bateman and Undra Parker and Nico Reijns and Abby C. King},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1737078},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1737078/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Engaging clergy and congregants as “lay-scientists” to promote community health and wellbeing in rural and urban Alaska: a community-engaged pilot study
AU - Nathan T. West
AU - Megan Waddell
AU - Diane K. King
AU - Shirley T. Le
AU - Sofia A. Portillo
AU - Kelsey R. Day
AU - Beverly R. Bateman
AU - Undra Parker
AU - Nico Reijns
AU - Abby C. King
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1737078
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1737078/full
AB - Introduction: The globally implemented Our Voice citizen science method has addressed social and structural health-related barriers in many community settings. Currently, however, this participatory action research method has not been adapted and tested in faith-based settings, which are trusted and well positioned to reach communities for health promotion and chronic disease prevention. The purpose of this study is to describe our process for adapting and piloting Our Voice and report lessons that will meaningfully engage faith-based communities in health promotion. Methods: Prior to Our Voice implementation, we used a community-academic design approach and sought input and recommendations from faith community members to increase reach and ensure Our Voice content and procedures aligned with cultural traditions. We then recruited three churches in which to pilot Our Voice and collected key process data through a baseline survey (e.g., lay-scientist demographics, physical activity behavior) and community notes (e.g., meeting attendance, lay-scientist engagement) to inform refinement of procedures. Trained research staff conducted objective environmental audits using a validated church environmental audit tool to describe the health promotion environment of each setting. Trained teams of clergy and congregants i.e., “lay-scientists”, next conducted an Our Voice environmental assessment using the Discovery Tool mobile app to evaluate each participating church’s space, features and proximal built environments. Results: The lay-scientist teams collected a total of 216 geo-tagged photos with narratives which were used to identify church-specific themes and relevant action plans to address priority needs. Example themes and action plans include: 1) Implementing congregational health needs assessments (e.g., brief online surveys for the broader congregation); 2) displaying health messaging across the church building (e.g., physical activity and healthy eating recommendations); and 3) encouraging both congregation- and community-wide health promotion (e.g., church-sponsored health summits, gardening initiatives with local schools). Discussion: Through multi-dimensional data audits collected by clergy and congregants, the Our Voice method fostered meaningful local data collection and analysis to identify and address community factors that may impact health. Findings provide evidence that action plans developed and implemented by faith-based community members may have a broad reach beyond the congregation and create potential opportunities for co-developing community-based health promotion programming.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -