Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYScientific Reports

Rural–urban differences in mortality from concurrent heart failure and cancer, 2011–2020

  • Anum Zehra1
  • Joseph J. Shearer1
  • Maryam Hashemian1
  • Gretell Henríquez-Santos1
  • Jungnam Joo2
  • Jacqueline B. Vo3
  • Véronique L. Roger1
  1. 1Heart Disease Phenomics Laboratory, Epidemiology and Community Health Branch, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. 2Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health
  3. 3Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute
Read full textDOICite

Abstract

Rural populations experience higher mortality rates than urban populations for both heart failure (HF) and cancer, however, mortality involving both conditions has not been well characterized. We evaluated national trends and demographic differences in HF-related and HF + cancer–related deaths and assessed rural–urban disparities. Using U.S. death certificate data from 2011 to 2020, we calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons for HF-related and HF + cancer–related deaths overall and stratified by rurality. During the study period, 3,453,655 HF-related deaths occurred, of which 274,715 (8%) also involved cancer. AAMRs increased over time for both outcomes. Rural areas consistently demonstrated higher mortality rates than urban areas for HF-related deaths (143.2 vs 110.1 per 100,000) and HF + cancer–related deaths (11.6 vs 8.8 per 100,000). Rural–urban disparities were evident across sex, age, and race/ethnicity groups. The largest rural-to-urban AAMR ratios were observed for lung/bronchus cancer (1.41), colorectal cancer (1.39), and leukemia (1.32). Mortality associated with both HF and cancer disproportionately affects rural populations. These findings highlight a growing dual burden of cardiovascular disease and cancer in rural communities and underscore the need for targeted prevention and care strategies addressing multimorbidity in these settings.

Related

  1. Ostomy and anastomotic leak differences among rural and urban surgical colon cancer patients
    Sara Myers, Emma Kraus, Elizabeth S Davis +5
    The Journal of surgical researchPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textOncologyPMC
  2. Disparities in Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Rural Versus Urban Michigan
    Reba Dhillon, Stephanie Mackenzie, Austin H. Qasawa +6
    Cancer MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  3. PM₂.₅ exposure and lung cancer mortality in Slovakia: gender differences and delayed effects
    J Pekarcikova, G Guerrero-Contreras, S Balderas-Díaz +1
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
  4. Trends and differences in breast cancer mortality by race, region and age among Brazilian women, 1996-2024: a nationwide ecological study
    A. T. Zuffo Yabrude, L. C. Souza Reis, A. E. Saragossa Zafalon +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Exploring sex differences in global cancer incidence and mortality and the role of national development level
    L.A. Hoveling, B.J. Bergink-Voorthuis, J.R.G. van Vlaardingen +4
    ESMO real world data and digital oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{zehra2026ruralurban,
  title = {{Rural–urban differences in mortality from concurrent heart failure and cancer, 2011–2020}},
  author = {Anum Zehra and Joseph J. Shearer and Maryam Hashemian and Gretell Henríquez-Santos and Jungnam Joo and Jacqueline B. Vo and Véronique L. Roger},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-62290-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62290-z},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Rural–urban differences in mortality from concurrent heart failure and cancer, 2011–2020
AU  - Anum Zehra
AU  - Joseph J. Shearer
AU  - Maryam Hashemian
AU  - Gretell Henríquez-Santos
AU  - Jungnam Joo
AU  - Jacqueline B. Vo
AU  - Véronique L. Roger
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-62290-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62290-z
AB  - Rural populations experience higher mortality rates than urban populations for both heart failure (HF) and cancer, however, mortality involving both conditions has not been well characterized. We evaluated national trends and demographic differences in HF-related and HF + cancer–related deaths and assessed rural–urban disparities. Using U.S. death certificate data from 2011 to 2020, we calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons for HF-related and HF + cancer–related deaths overall and stratified by rurality. During the study period, 3,453,655 HF-related deaths occurred, of which 274,715 (8%) also involved cancer. AAMRs increased over time for both outcomes. Rural areas consistently demonstrated higher mortality rates than urban areas for HF-related deaths (143.2 vs 110.1 per 100,000) and HF + cancer–related deaths (11.6 vs 8.8 per 100,000). Rural–urban disparities were evident across sex, age, and race/ethnicity groups. The largest rural-to-urban AAMR ratios were observed for lung/bronchus cancer (1.41), colorectal cancer (1.39), and leukemia (1.32). Mortality associated with both HF and cancer disproportionately affects rural populations. These findings highlight a growing dual burden of cardiovascular disease and cancer in rural communities and underscore the need for targeted prevention and care strategies addressing multimorbidity in these settings.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -