Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics
Abstract
Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.
Related
- Teaching a plasma physics and engineering class at a liberal arts college using Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs)
- Perioperative shear wave elastography for the evaluation of spinal cord release in pediatric dysraphism: first experience in 21 patients
- AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology II: Project Planning and Proposal Evaluation
- Reporting treatment planning, delivery, and dose evaluation for 3‐dimensional MLC‐based SFRT: A single institutional clinical experience
- Terahertz nanoscopy of quantum-geometric photovoltaics in bilayer graphene
BibTeX
@misc{merritt2026design,
title = {{Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics}},
author = {Rachael L. Merritt and H. J. Lewandowski},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.24715},
eprint = {2609.24715},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24715},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics
AU - Rachael L. Merritt
AU - H. J. Lewandowski
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.24715
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24715
AB - Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.
ER -