Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,625 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Spreading the Joy of Literacy: A community-based survey of parents by parents

  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, General Pediatric Division, Hoekelman Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, United States of America

Abstract

Background: Literacy is an important social determinant of health. Failure to develop emergent literacy skills before kindergarten is a risk factor for academic failure, poverty, incarceration, and early death. Reading comprehension depends on both language comprehension and alphabetic decoding skills. The Home Literacy Environment literature tends to focus on reading aloud to develop oral language but less is known about letter-themed tools. Design: Our hypothesis was that letter-themed toys and books would be acceptable to all families but that lower socio-economic status (SES) households would be less likely to have them. Using methods of Community Based Participatory Research, 3 caregivers with young children living in the City of Rochester, NY, completed IRB training and provided cultural context for decisions throughout this study. We surveyed a convenience sample of 156 caregivers at 10 community events. We showed a poster with pictures of alphabet-themed toys and asked caregivers to count how many they had in the home. ZIP code was used as a proxy for SES. Results: We surveyed 156 caregivers, excluding 13 responses because of missing information. Of the 143 remaining, 139 (97.2%) thought it was important that a child know most of the alphabet letters before kindergarten. 1 in 4 of our respondents didn’t have a single literacy toy in their home and an additional 1 in 6 had only one. We calculated a p value of 0.0004 for the hypothesis that there is a difference by SES in the number of these items in the home. Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that joyful letter-themed tools are acceptable to parents in general but that low-SES households are less likely to have them. Closing the gap in early alphabet exposure could contribute to reducing inequities in school success and lifelong health.

Related

  1. The relationship between digital literacy and employment quality: Evidence from a Chinese Household Survey
    Xiaoyun Wu, Danting Cao, Beihe Wu
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  2. Community knowledge and perceptions of social, ecological, and behavioural risk factors for mpox in Burundi: A nationwide cross-sectional survey
    Néhémie Nzoyikorera, Emmanuelline Mukama, Jonas Ngendakumana +11
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOSPMC
  3. Heterogeneity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunoreactivity in young children in Blantyre, Malawi: A community-based survey
    Hannah M. Rickman, Mphatso D. Phiri, Hannah Mbale +12
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  4. Revisiting Attentional Spreading within Form-Based Perceptual Groups: An ERP Study
    Tetsuko Kasai, Kei Kobayashi
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. Flagellar number governs bacterial spreading and transport efficiency.
    Najafi J, Shaebani Mr, John T +3
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC49 citedBiophysicsGeneral biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{collinsmcgowan2026spreading,
  title = {{Spreading the Joy of Literacy: A community-based survey of parents by parents}},
  author = {Sarah Collins-McGowan and Claude Andrew Aligne and Kelly McDermott and Candace Cabral and Ana Pilar Ramos Benitez and Melissa Lomack and Nicole Mayo},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361893},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361893},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Spreading the Joy of Literacy: A community-based survey of parents by parents
AU  - Sarah Collins-McGowan
AU  - Claude Andrew Aligne
AU  - Kelly McDermott
AU  - Candace Cabral
AU  - Ana Pilar Ramos Benitez
AU  - Melissa Lomack
AU  - Nicole Mayo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361893
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361893
AB  - Background: Literacy is an important social determinant of health. Failure to develop emergent literacy skills before kindergarten is a risk factor for academic failure, poverty, incarceration, and early death. Reading comprehension depends on both language comprehension and alphabetic decoding skills. The Home Literacy Environment literature tends to focus on reading aloud to develop oral language but less is known about letter-themed tools. Design: Our hypothesis was that letter-themed toys and books would be acceptable to all families but that lower socio-economic status (SES) households would be less likely to have them. Using methods of Community Based Participatory Research, 3 caregivers with young children living in the City of Rochester, NY, completed IRB training and provided cultural context for decisions throughout this study. We surveyed a convenience sample of 156 caregivers at 10 community events. We showed a poster with pictures of alphabet-themed toys and asked caregivers to count how many they had in the home. ZIP code was used as a proxy for SES. Results: We surveyed 156 caregivers, excluding 13 responses because of missing information. Of the 143 remaining, 139 (97.2%) thought it was important that a child know most of the alphabet letters before kindergarten. 1 in 4 of our respondents didn’t have a single literacy toy in their home and an additional 1 in 6 had only one. We calculated a p value of 0.0004 for the hypothesis that there is a difference by SES in the number of these items in the home. Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that joyful letter-themed tools are acceptable to parents in general but that low-SES households are less likely to have them. Closing the gap in early alphabet exposure could contribute to reducing inequities in school success and lifelong health.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -