Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of otology

Evaluation of Transtympanic Steroid Injection Dosage in Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.

  1. 1Northeast Ohio Medical University, College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
  2. 2HEARS, LLC, United States.

Abstract

In sensorineural hearing loss treatment, transtympanic membrane (TTM) steroid injections help in recovery. However, steroid dosage distribution and patient recovery rates remains underexplored. Our systematic review compiles steroid regimens and their hearing recovery rates. PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar. Search terms included TTM steroid and hearing loss. Inclusion criteria were measurements for human hearing recovery, full-text articles, and studies published on or before 1/20/2025. Exclusion criteria included reviews. Primary outcomes were hearing and patient recovery rates. For analysis, we focused on dose levels and simultaneous systemic steroids, and employed descriptive and exploratory study-level analyses Results: 29 articles were included. Of studies reporting gender, the distribution was 54.6% (635) male and 45.4% (528) female. 1,294 total patients received TTM steroids with distributions being: 26.0% (n=336) received 4 mg/mL dexamethasone, 25.2% (n=326) received 5 mg/mL dexamethasone, 2.7% (n=35) received 8 mg/mL dexamethasone, 3.5% (n=45) used 10 mg/mL dexamethasone, 3.1% (n=40) received 24 mg/mL dexamethasone, 31.8% (n=411) received 40 mg/mL methylprednisolone, 2.6% (n=34) received 62.5 mg/mL methylprednisolone, and 5.2% (n=67) received 125 mg/mL methylprednisolone. Hearing recovery ranged from 6.4-41 decibels (dB). The exploratory analysis did not identify significant differences in hearing recovery; however, methodological variance limits direct cross-study comparison and limits dose equivalence. Variability exists in regimen and outcomes reported. The findings of this study-level exploratory analysis should not be interpreted as evidence that a dose-response relationship does not exist. Therefore, this study provides a framework for researchers and clinicians to understand steroid regimens used to date.

Related

  1. Efficacy and safety of gastrodin acupoint injection as an adjunctive therapy for sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhijie Wang, Dongchen Geng, Wu Yuan +3
    American Journal of OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyDOAJ
  2. Efficacy of Defibrinogenation Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Jieun Shin, Jaekwang Lee, Jong Dai Kim +4
    Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Post-Treatment Response and Safety of Stem Cell-Based Urethral Injection Therapy for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shadha Nasser Mohammed Bahutair, Sana Fathima, Ketaki Devendra Tayade +4
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  4. 10-Minute vs. 4-Hour Post-Gadolinium 3D-FLAIR MRI for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Yiwen Liu, Zitong Zhao, Zuer Gong +2
    Journal of otologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  5. Study protocol of the SuDHO study: hyperbaric oxygen treatment added to standard care for acute idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss – a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Kristina Sture Larsen, Frederik Kragerud Goplen, Haakon Arnesen +18
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefDOAJPMC
BibTeX
@article{nallapaneni2026evaluation,
  title = {{Evaluation of Transtympanic Steroid Injection Dosage in Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.}},
  author = {Sanjana Nallapaneni and Naveen S Raj and Margaret P Byars and Alexander M Belardo and Anita S Jeyakumar},
  journal = {Journal of otology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26599/joto.2026.9540082},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996883},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation of Transtympanic Steroid Injection Dosage in Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.
AU  - Sanjana Nallapaneni
AU  - Naveen S Raj
AU  - Margaret P Byars
AU  - Alexander M Belardo
AU  - Anita S Jeyakumar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of otology
DO  - 10.26599/joto.2026.9540082
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996883
AB  - In sensorineural hearing loss treatment, transtympanic membrane (TTM) steroid injections help in recovery. However, steroid dosage distribution and patient recovery rates remains underexplored. Our systematic review compiles steroid regimens and their hearing recovery rates. PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar. Search terms included TTM steroid and hearing loss. Inclusion criteria were measurements for human hearing recovery, full-text articles, and studies published on or before 1/20/2025. Exclusion criteria included reviews. Primary outcomes were hearing and patient recovery rates. For analysis, we focused on dose levels and simultaneous systemic steroids, and employed descriptive and exploratory study-level analyses Results: 29 articles were included. Of studies reporting gender, the distribution was 54.6% (635) male and 45.4% (528) female. 1,294 total patients received TTM steroids with distributions being: 26.0% (n=336) received 4 mg/mL dexamethasone, 25.2% (n=326) received 5 mg/mL dexamethasone, 2.7% (n=35) received 8 mg/mL dexamethasone, 3.5% (n=45) used 10 mg/mL dexamethasone, 3.1% (n=40) received 24 mg/mL dexamethasone, 31.8% (n=411) received 40 mg/mL methylprednisolone, 2.6% (n=34) received 62.5 mg/mL methylprednisolone, and 5.2% (n=67) received 125 mg/mL methylprednisolone. Hearing recovery ranged from 6.4-41 decibels (dB). The exploratory analysis did not identify significant differences in hearing recovery; however, methodological variance limits direct cross-study comparison and limits dose equivalence. Variability exists in regimen and outcomes reported. The findings of this study-level exploratory analysis should not be interpreted as evidence that a dose-response relationship does not exist. Therefore, this study provides a framework for researchers and clinicians to understand steroid regimens used to date.
SN  - 1672-2930
SN  - 2524-1753
ER  -