Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Same-Session Clearance of Small Common Bile Duct Stones After Sphincterotomy Alone or With Adjunctive Extraction: A Single-Center Observational Study

  1. 1Babol University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

BackgroundSmall common bile duct stones may pass after endoscopic sphincterotomy, but leaving the duct without attempting extraction also leaves clearance uncertain. We compared same-session stone clearance after sphincterotomy alone with clearance after sphincterotomy followed by balloon-based and/or basket extraction.

MethodsWe conducted a single-center observational study of 203 patients with common bile duct stones 5 mm or smaller who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The endoscopist chose the treatment during the procedure. Forty-seven patients underwent sphincterotomy alone, and 156 underwent sphincterotomy followed by balloon-based and/or basket extraction. The primary outcome was fluoroscopically confirmed clearance during the same procedure. Intraprocedural bleeding was a secondary outcome. We calculated unadjusted risk ratios and used Fishers exact test for sparse events.

ResultsThe mean age was 58.62 years (standard deviation 20.10), and 90 patients (44.3%) were men. Same-session clearance was documented in 21 of 47 patients (44.7%) after sphincterotomy alone and 130 of 156 (83.3%) after adjunctive extraction (risk ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.58; P < 0.001). A prominent ampulla was more common in the sphincterotomy-alone group (25.5% vs 10.9%; P = 0.012). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 2 patients after sphincterotomy alone and none after adjunctive extraction (4.3% vs 0%; Fishers exact P = 0.053).

ConclusionsAdjunctive extraction was associated with a higher rate of documented same-session clearance than sphincterotomy alone. Treatment was not randomized, the groups differed at baseline, and only two bleeding events occurred. These findings therefore do not prove that adjunctive extraction is causally superior or safer. Prospective studies using standardized techniques and follow-up are needed.

Related

  1. Adjunctive Oliceridine During Propofol or Ciprofol Sedation for Same-Session Bidirectional Endoscopy in Older Adults: A Multicenter Randomized 2×2 Factorial Trial.
    Yongjiu Ji, Chenxi Xu, Siqi Yang +9
    Drug design, development and therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  2. Efficacy of adjunctive oral Janus kinase inhibitors in hospitalized patients with extensive or difficult-to-control drug eruptions: a retrospective observational case series
    Yunkai Zhu, Xia Wang, Yuhang Huang +8
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyDOAJ
  3. Creatinine Clearance, Ceftazidime-Avibactam Exposure, and Clinical Outcomes in a Real-World TDM Cohort: A Retrospective Observational Study.
    Bo Yang, Jianbiao Meng, Bei Zheng +6
    Drug design, development and therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  4. Compliance with post-extraction instructions and its association with alveolar osteitis (dry socket): a prospective observational study.
    Aniqa Saleem, Nadia Khaleeq, Tanzeel Salim Gandapur +4
    BMC oral healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Prior to Biliary Stenting for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sofia Coelho Meine, Gabriel de Oliveira Amaral, Mateus Rech Tedesco +3
    Journal of Gastroenterology and HepatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text3 citedGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@misc{chari2026samesession,
  title = {{Same-Session Clearance of Small Common Bile Duct Stones After Sphincterotomy Alone or With Adjunctive Extraction: A Single-Center Observational Study}},
  author = {F. Yadollahzadeh Chari and J. Shokri Shirvani and S. H. Abedi Valukalaei and A. Yadollahzadeh Chari},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.17.26363343},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363343v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Same-Session Clearance of Small Common Bile Duct Stones After Sphincterotomy Alone or With Adjunctive Extraction: A Single-Center Observational Study
AU  - F. Yadollahzadeh Chari
AU  - J. Shokri Shirvani
AU  - S. H. Abedi Valukalaei
AU  - A. Yadollahzadeh Chari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.17.26363343
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363343v1
AB  - BackgroundSmall common bile duct stones may pass after endoscopic sphincterotomy, but leaving the duct without attempting extraction also leaves clearance uncertain. We compared same-session stone clearance after sphincterotomy alone with clearance after sphincterotomy followed by balloon-based and/or basket extraction.  MethodsWe conducted a single-center observational study of 203 patients with common bile duct stones 5 mm or smaller who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The endoscopist chose the treatment during the procedure. Forty-seven patients underwent sphincterotomy alone, and 156 underwent sphincterotomy followed by balloon-based and/or basket extraction. The primary outcome was fluoroscopically confirmed clearance during the same procedure. Intraprocedural bleeding was a secondary outcome. We calculated unadjusted risk ratios and used Fishers exact test for sparse events.  ResultsThe mean age was 58.62 years (standard deviation 20.10), and 90 patients (44.3%) were men. Same-session clearance was documented in 21 of 47 patients (44.7%) after sphincterotomy alone and 130 of 156 (83.3%) after adjunctive extraction (risk ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.58; P < 0.001). A prominent ampulla was more common in the sphincterotomy-alone group (25.5% vs 10.9%; P = 0.012). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 2 patients after sphincterotomy alone and none after adjunctive extraction (4.3% vs 0%; Fishers exact P = 0.053).  ConclusionsAdjunctive extraction was associated with a higher rate of documented same-session clearance than sphincterotomy alone. Treatment was not randomized, the groups differed at baseline, and only two bleeding events occurred. These findings therefore do not prove that adjunctive extraction is causally superior or safer. Prospective studies using standardized techniques and follow-up are needed.
ER  -