Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

A Temporal Reliability and Sustainability Score Framework for Ranking Heart Rate Variability Metrics During Pharmacological Autonomic Blockade in Rats

  1. 1University of Michigan

Abstract

Background: While Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is a cornerstone of non-invasive autonomic assessment, the sensitivity and sustainability of specific HRV parameters remain debated. This study introduces a "sustainability score" to systematically validate which metrics best reflect autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation following pharmacological blockade. Methods: Ten male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with ECG electrodes. After recovery, rats underwent randomized atropine (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and propranolol (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) sessions separated by at least 3 days. Baseline ECG was recorded for 30 min before each session, followed by 90-min post-drug ECG recording. HRV parameters were analyzed in sequential 15-min and 30-min segments. Reliability was assessed using average p-values across post-drug segments and a sustainability score, defined as the number of segments significantly different from baseline. Results: After atropine, HF Power showed the strongest rapid parasympathetic-related response in 15-min segments, with the lowest average p-value (0.1476) and highest sustainability score (4), followed by RSA (p=0.16148; score=4). HFn was less reliable in 15-min segments (p=0.23147; score=2) but became the most reliable parasympathetic-related metric in 30-min segments (p=0.0001; score=3). After propranolol, SI was the most reliable sympathetic-related metric in both 15-min (p=0.18225; score=2) and 30-min segments (p=0.0393; score=2), while SD2/SD1 showed the strongest 30-min sympathovagal-balance response (p=0.0200; score=3). Conclusion: HF Power is recommended for rapid parasympathetic-related assessment in short windows, HFn for longer-window parasympathetic assessment, SI for sympathetic-assessment, and SD2/SD1 for 30-min sympathovagal-balance analysis. Sustainability scoring provides a structured framework for selecting ECG-derived autonomic markers.

Related

  1. Trajectory-based associations between a structured acupressure protocol, blood pressure variability, and autonomic balance in patients with primary hypertension
    Mayasyanti Dewi Amir, Nunung Liawati, Ady Waluya +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Assessment of Handgrip Strength and Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy Using Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests and Heart Rate Variability in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
    Sri Harini Senthilkumar, Meet Shah, Manish P Parmar +4
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Longitudinal Trajectories of Autonomic Maturation in Preterm Infants Using Serial 24-Hour Heart Rate Variability Monitoring.
    Masashiro Sugino, Toru Kuboi, Yoko Tadatomo +7
    BiosensorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  4. Heart rate variability and electrocardiographic parameters among workers exposed to chronic intermittent hypobaric hypoxia in the Peruvian Andes: A cross-sectional study Cardiac autonomic function in Andean workers
    E. S. Montes-Madariaga, J. B. Ortiz-Saavedra, J. S. Mamani Castillo +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  5. Dose-dependent cardiac autonomic dysregulation under classroom crowding: heart rate variability analysis and machine learning classification.
    Mohamed Naeem
    Journal of physiological anthropologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{ali2026temporal,
  title = {{A Temporal Reliability and Sustainability Score Framework for Ranking Heart Rate Variability Metrics During Pharmacological Autonomic Blockade in Rats}},
  author = {M. K. Ali and S. Ji and S. Long and S. Gong and J. D. Chen},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.04.748642},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.748642v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Temporal Reliability and Sustainability Score Framework for Ranking Heart Rate Variability Metrics During Pharmacological Autonomic Blockade in Rats
AU  - M. K. Ali
AU  - S. Ji
AU  - S. Long
AU  - S. Gong
AU  - J. D. Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.04.748642
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.748642v1
AB  - Background: While Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is a cornerstone of non-invasive autonomic assessment, the sensitivity and sustainability of specific HRV parameters remain debated. This study introduces a "sustainability score" to systematically validate which metrics best reflect autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation following pharmacological blockade. Methods: Ten male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with ECG electrodes. After recovery, rats underwent randomized atropine (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and propranolol (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) sessions separated by at least 3 days. Baseline ECG was recorded for 30 min before each session, followed by 90-min post-drug ECG recording. HRV parameters were analyzed in sequential 15-min and 30-min segments. Reliability was assessed using average p-values across post-drug segments and a sustainability score, defined as the number of segments significantly different from baseline. Results: After atropine, HF Power showed the strongest rapid parasympathetic-related response in 15-min segments, with the lowest average p-value (0.1476) and highest sustainability score (4), followed by RSA (p=0.16148; score=4). HFn was less reliable in 15-min segments (p=0.23147; score=2) but became the most reliable parasympathetic-related metric in 30-min segments (p=0.0001; score=3). After propranolol, SI was the most reliable sympathetic-related metric in both 15-min (p=0.18225; score=2) and 30-min segments (p=0.0393; score=2), while SD2/SD1 showed the strongest 30-min sympathovagal-balance response (p=0.0200; score=3). Conclusion: HF Power is recommended for rapid parasympathetic-related assessment in short windows, HFn for longer-window parasympathetic assessment, SI for sympathetic-assessment, and SD2/SD1 for 30-min sympathovagal-balance analysis. Sustainability scoring provides a structured framework for selecting ECG-derived autonomic markers.
ER  -